<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          HongKong Comment(1)

          A few wrongs make a right

          HK Edition | Updated: 2017-09-26 08:02
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          The rule of law, supposedly dead because Joshua Wong Chi-fung and other activists were jailed, was given a new lease of life as former University of Hong Kong student union president Billy Fung Jing-en and his then vice-president Colman Li Fung-kei were given a lenient sentence for their roles in the HKU Council siege.

          But our rule of law is still in a critical condition. The latest concern is whether comments by lawmaker Junius Ho Kwan-yiu who called for pro-independence activists to be "killed mercilessly" would be investigated "fairly."

          Ho was busy lately with his campaign to pressure the HKU to sack "Occupy" co-founder and associate law professor Benny Tai Yiu-ting. He was quite successful in building up a momentum and a following. Then, three words tripped him up: "Kill without mercy."

          The occasion was a rally attended by thousands against Tai and those advocating "Hong Kong independence" on university campuses. Afterward, Ho was in an agitated state and surrounded by reporters. He then launched a tirade against them saying they were ignorant, stupid and biased.

          "If 'Hong Kong independence' advocates are subverting the fate of a country ... why not kill them?" Ho asked. "To 'kill them without mercy' means we deplore wrongdoers like our enemies."

          The dissidents exploited Ho's slip of the tongue immediately and issued a statement. In the statement, 22 dissident lawmakers said Ho, as a legislator and lawyer, had "gone beyond the bottom line of freedom of speech and morals".

          "We strongly reprimand his cold-blooded speech, as it advocated direct violence and allegedly broke the law," the statement read.

          They then added that according to the Public Order Ordinance, it is a criminal offense for any person to "use threatening, abusive or insulting words" in public and with intent to provoke a breach of the peace. It is also a criminal offense for anyone to make any public statement "which is likely to incite or induce any person to kill or do physical injury to anyone else".

          "The police have arrested people who use hate speech in the past. Ho has broken the law and the police and the Department of Justice should take action," the statement added.

          What the dissidents' statement was aiming at is quite childish. They obviously have the "democracy wall controversy" in mind when they say Ho has "gone beyond the bottom line of freedom of speech and morals".

          Similarly, they invoked the Public Order Ordinance because Joshua Wong, Alex Chow Yong-kang and Nathan Law Kwun-chung went on trial and was convicted for this crime. Needless to say, the prosecution had successfully sought a heavier sentence against the three on the grounds that the word "retake" in their rallying cry to "retake Civic Square" indicated the use of violence.

          Our dissidents are now smiling smugly. They suggest that law enforcers now apparently are fine with people openly using the word "kill" at a public rally. This smacks of double standards.

          But I must say, the joke is on the dissidents. What kind of "democrats" who claim they themselves are being oppressed would tell the authorities to oppress others so as not to appear inconsistent? What is more important for them, consistency or freedom and rights?

          If Junius Ho is also convicted by the Public Order Ordinance, will our dissidents respect it from now on and not utter a word when in future the same law is used to prosecute other public order disrupters? In other words, will our dissidents also be consistent? I don't think so.

          This brings us back to Chris Patten, who was in town again recently. It was unfortunate that he needs excuses to visit our city, and a book takes a long time to finish. If I were him, I would have blogged instead so that every time a blog post is published I could then comment on Hong Kong's current affairs.

          All self-respecting retired politicians know that it is not prudent to comment on the job they have left behind. This is especially true with a former colonial governor and a former colony. I really cannot imagine why this kind of "the former white master knows best" mentality is even acceptable in today's politically correct world.

          Our city's politics is ridiculous, and therefore may be a few wrongs will make one right. I would start with jailing Junius Ho. I am just kidding!

          (HK Edition 09/26/2017 page8)

          Today's Top News

          Editor's picks

          Most Viewed

          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文 在线 日韩 亚洲 欧美| 国产av一区二区午夜福利| 国产综合久久久久久鬼色| 2020国产在线视精品在| 日本国产亚洲一区二区| 成人亚欧欧美激情在线观看| 精品国产成人午夜福利| 国产亚洲AV电影院之毛片| 好男人视频在线播放| 亚洲国产一线二线三线| 国产桃色在线成免费视频| 久久综合国产一区二区三区| 国产精品自在拍首页视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 在线人妻无码一区二区| 久久无码中文字幕免费影院蜜桃 | 国内少妇人妻丰满av| 日本一本正道综合久久dvd| 久久精品国产亚洲成人av| 亚洲成人av免费一区| 午夜爽爽爽男女免费观看影院| 国产91在线播放免费| yw尤物av无码国产在线观看| 加勒比无码人妻东京热| 国产在线精品国偷产拍| av天堂久久天堂色综合| 另类国产精品一区二区| av天堂亚洲天堂亚洲天堂| 国产成人AV在线免播放观看新| 人妻无码| 亚洲精品日韩精品久久| 亚洲精品第一页中文字幕| 高清不卡一区二区三区| 99精品高清在线播放| 91亚洲精品福利在线播放| 少妇特黄a一区二区三区| 青青草久热这里只有精品| 亚洲精品一区二区美女| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区| 我们高清观看免费中国片| 亚洲欧洲一区二区免费|