<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Little problem in levying real estate tax

          By Jia Kang | China Daily | Updated: 2018-01-12 08:44
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          Real estate tax is a popular topic of discussion these days, with some people saying it is difficult to levy real estate tax in China because land property rights in the countries that have imposed such a tax belong to individuals, not to the State as in China.

          But not all land in foreign countries belongs to individuals. In the United Kingdom for example, both private land and public land exist, and public land there belongs to various levels of government or public bodies. According to the England land law that covers England and Wales, there are two types of housing and land relationship. The first is freehold-a freeholder with property right over land can be either a single person or a group of people. The second is leasehold, in which the property right to housing is limited to just using the land, not owning it. Scotland and Northern Ireland have similar laws, the real estate tax in the UK, called Council tax, is imposed on both freehold and leasehold properties.

          Some people in China also argue that the real estate tax is actually a "double tax", because the housing price includes the land price. But land price is rental and should not be confused with real estate tax. In today's multiple tax system, whether or not a real estate tax should be levied depends on whether an economy can strike the right balance between land rental and real estate tax.

          Moreover, levying of real estate tax may help prevent housing prices from shooting through the roof owing to sky-high land prices, as seen in the past.

          Another group of people argue that it is not feasible to impose real estate tax. For instance, a scholar said at a recent forum that it may take China up to 150 years to levy real estate tax nationwide because it has to first solve the tax base assessment problem, which is very complicated.

          But China launched a pilot program for collecting property tax more than one decade ago. Aimed at untying the knots in the tax base assessment mechanism, the pilot program was launched in six cities, and has now been extended to 10 more cities.

          My research shows it is possible to access all the basic immovable property data, upload them on the computer system, and use software to assess property tax.

          There are also people who ask how can the limited property housing problem be solved if real estate tax is levied. I tried to deal with the limited property housing problem through real estate tax reform. In fact, a pilot project has been launched in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to solve the problem.

          To reform the real estate tax system, first we need to expedite legislation, as statutory taxation is vital to tax reform-and legislation is expected to be completed within the five years of the next National People's Congress, China's top legislature.

          Second, real estate tax should be levied in accordance with China's actual conditions and stage of development. Besides, opinions from different walks of society should be solicited before finalizing the real estate tax law, as it would enable people from different strata of society to voice their demands and give their suggestions. This means the tax reform should be in accordance with the "greatest common divisor" of the legal framework.

          Third, related tax reforms should also be considered, because real estate tax or immovable property tax is a general concept that includes different types of taxes related to the real estate sector. The central government's decision to accelerate legislation of real estate tax and promote tax reform mainly refers to the narrowly defined immovable property tax in the holding process. As such, the most important job for this year is to establish a foolproof immovable property registration system.

          And fourth, we should be fully prepared to deal with the difficulties that may arise in the legislation process, and actively promote consensus among various parties.

          The author is director of the China Academy of New Supply-side Economics, and former director of the Institute for Fiscal Science Research under the Ministry of Finance.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久香蕉欧美精品| 无码人妻av免费一区二区三区| 国产成AV人片久青草影院| 亚洲国产亚洲综合在线尤物| 欧洲无码一区二区三区在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线看| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 激情人妻自拍中文夜夜嗨| 一个人看的www片高清在线| 亚洲精品国产美女久久久| 国产乱子伦一区二区三区视频播放| 久久精品久久电影免费理论片| 亚洲日韩av无码中文字幕美国| 91久久亚洲综合精品成人| 特级做a爰片毛片免费看无码| 亚洲精品一区二区三区大桥未久| 国内自拍网红在线综合一区| 国产精品久久久久aaaa| 成 人免费va视频| 国产精品人成视频免费国产| 国产成人午夜精品福利| 欧洲一区二区中文字幕| 嗯灬啊灬把腿张开灬动态图| 在线观看国产久青草| 午夜福利你懂的在线观看| 欧美人人妻人人澡人人尤物 | 高清中文字幕一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区永久免费| 精品人妻少妇嫩草av系列| 天堂www在线中文| 一区二区三区日本久久九| 亚洲毛片多多影院| 一区二区三区在线 | 欧洲| 国产av最新一区二区| 国内精品大秀视频日韩精品 | 人妻蜜臀久久av不卡| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 中文字幕国产精品第一页| 久久99精品久久水蜜桃| 久久精品国产熟女亚洲av| 中文字幕人成乱码中文乱码 |