<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / From the Press

          UK 2019 General Election: A tale of Boris and Brexit

          By Ji Xianbai | cgtn | Updated: 2019-12-14 13:50
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          The Conservatives swept to a landslide triumph and a single majority government in the just-finished 2019 UK General Election.

          For the Conservatives, the credit goes firstly to Boris Johnson's strong and charismatic, if occasionally erratic, leadership. This election was all about Boris and Brexit. Since 2016, Johnson has personally presided over penetrating a series of three-word political slogans - "Take Back Control", "Do or Die," "Come What May," and "Get Brexit Done" – to get his pro-Brexit message across.

          The 2019 election results, which significantly mirror the 2016 Brexit referendum results, suggest that his campaigning strategy has paid off handsomely.

          More profoundly, Johnson's success is emblematic of the rise of retail politics. Through a not-so-Tory and not-so-ideological manifesto, Johnson pulled off a package of pragmatic policy measures that voters explicitly desired - whether it was Britain leaving the European Union (EU), investment in health care, or curbing immigration.

          By contrast, Labor stuck to its conventional wholesale politics. By offering voters a blanket package that blended wanted and unwanted socialist policy elements, Labour disregarded people's specific policy appeal about pressing issues of the day.

          Indeed, in several former Labor strongholds in northern England, voters swung to the Conservatives partly out of the frustration over Labour's rigid, wholesale politics as usual. Politics need to be more responsive and attentive to win votes. Sadly, Labour seems to have failed to come to terms with the tectonic shifts in the British political landscape with senior figures like Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell blaming Brexit for the party's defeat.

          Johnson's commanding victory aside, the timing is extremely tight on Brexit, the defining issue of his upcoming premiership. He will first put together a government by next Monday, and then put his Brexit deal up for a second reading in the Parliament by December 20 so that it could be passed before Christmas.

          Subsequently, the withdrawal deal will be passed onto Europe for legislation. The European Parliament will resume work on January 3 to debate and vote on the deal. If the deal passes with a simple majority, the deal will appear on the table of the European Council for political endorsement. This time, a "super" qualified majority (at least 72 percent of the remaining countries – 20 of the 27 – comprising at least 65 percent of their population) would be required. It is only if – and this is a very big if – all the required legislative procedures are concluded by the end of January that Britain may leave the EU on time in six weeks.

          So, has the UK steered clear the devastating "no-deal Brexit" scenario? The answer unfortunately is no. The revised Brexit deal allows for a Northern Irish veto over the terms of Brexit, and neither of the two main local political parties – pro-Ireland Sinn Féin and pro-Union Democratic Unionist Party – are prepared to give their consent to Johnson. Even if the UK as a whole override the Northern Ireland on the Brexit deal, there is no guarantee that Britain can avoid a no-trade-deal Brexit.

          In 2020, the UK will have to negotiate a new trade deal with the EU. The reality, however, is that it is exceedingly time-consuming to negotiate trade agreements.

          It took Brussels three years to negotiate with Singapore, five years to negotiate with Canada – and astonishingly twenty years to negotiate with Mercosur. Assuming a four-year period is to be allocated for the EU and the UK to reach an agreement on trade as some optimistically estimated, Britain would find itself in a no-trade-deal situation for at least three years. To complicate things further, the potential EU-UK trade deal will need approvals from all EU national and regional parliaments. Johnson should be reminded that in 2016 the tiny Belgian Wallonia region (which represented approximately one percent of EU population and economic output) nearly single-handedly derailed the EU's concluded trade deal with Canada.

          Winning the British general elections looks easy for Boris Johnson, but winning the hearts and minds of the European citizens across the English Channel might prove more challenging. The story of Boris and Brexit will not end with the poll results and more tests await Britain and Boris down the road.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产美女精品久久久 | 制服jk白丝h无内视频网站| 一本久久a久久免费精品不卡| 少妇高潮久久蜜柚av| 日韩中文字幕人妻一区| 亚洲婷婷丁香| 国产一精品一av一免费| 无码国产69精品久久久久网站| 亚洲天堂视频网站| 午夜久久一区二区狠狠干| 无码国产偷倩在线播放老年人| 亚洲精品第一在线观看视频| 国产福利社区一区二区| 国产精品国产三级国av在线观看| 免费特黄夫妻生活片| 久久不见久久见www日本| 久久精品国产国语对白| 成人精品老熟妇一区二区| 97中文字幕在线观看| 妺妺窝人体色WWW看人体| 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站| 日韩AV无码精品一二三区| 人禽交 欧美 网站| 亚洲国产av永久精品成人| 日本精品中文字幕在线不卡| 中国农村真卖bbwbbw| 无码AV无码天堂资源网影音先锋| 亚洲色在线无码国产精品| 日日噜久久人妻一区二区| 国产激情久久久久影院老熟女免费| 免费无码va一区二区三区 | 欧美大片va欧美在线播放| 精品无人乱码一区二区三区的优势 | 999热在线精品观看全部| 99久久99久久久精品久久| 韩国免费a级毛片久久| 性欧美vr高清极品| 午夜福利影院不卡影院| 麻豆国产va免费精品高清在线| 日韩视频免费| 亚洲中文无码成人影院在线播放|