<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Featured Contributors

          EU needs dose of reality about 'vaccine diplomacy'

          By Seymur Mammadov | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-03-30 09:03
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

          There is a catastrophic shortage of vaccines against COVID-19 in the world, but at the same time, the world is faced with the threatening phenomenon of "vaccine wars" or "vaccine diplomacy". As part of this policy, China found itself caught in some new conspiracy theory involving vaccines. However, the some of the motives behind this game by the West are quite obvious.

          Charles Michel, president of the European Council, accused the authorities of the Russian Federation and China of using vaccines against the coronavirus as a means of propaganda. As he said in Brussels, both countries supply drugs for vaccination to other countries "in a very limited amount", but they widely publicize it.

          The EU has been using any means to block the Chinese vaccine from entering European markets. Moreover, this is being done at a time when Europe itself needs additional volumes of vaccines.

          A vaccine manufacturer trying to expand the supply of its products to new markets using some form of advertising, mass media and other resources represents a normal economic process in the market economy. For example, Russia is actively promoting its vaccines around the world, and European manufacturers of vaccines are doing the same. It's not clear what, in fact, has sparked this dissatisfaction in Europe.

          On the other hand, China does not impose its vaccines on anyone. But the question arises, whose interests are supported by the European authorities - citizens or pharmaceutical companies. On the contrary, Beijing is one of the few who is supplying its vaccine to many countries free of charge, realizing that equal access to vaccine should be ensured for both the populations of the wealthiest and the poorest countries of the world. In particular, Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that the Chinese authorities are supplying the coronavirus vaccine free of charge to 69 developing countries, as China also sells the drug to 43 more countries.

          “As part of the COVAX initiative, we have pledged to provide 10 million doses of vaccines to meet the needs of primarily developing countries. China is collaborating with more than 10 countries to jointly develop and manufacture a vaccine with more than 100,000 volunteers,” Wang added at the annual news conference on the sidelines of the National People's Congress.

          Thus, China is currently the most active participant in the COVAX initiative, providing developing countries with a very significant amount of vaccines completely free of charge, while the EU countries are increasingly excluded from this process, lowering the size of quotas for countries outside the EU zone. And the EU's recent decision to significantly restrict the supply of vaccines to countries outside the EU suggests that Europe is openly distancing itself from the policy of equal access to vaccines for developing and poor countries of the world.

          Isn't this direct evidence of China's disinterested, humanitarian policy? So why is this not being noticed in Europe?

          It is worth noting that China is confidently offering high-quality and proven protection against COVID-19, as the Chinese vaccines from Sinopharm, Sinovac and CanSino have been repeatedly tested in China. They are already in use in various countries -- such as Indonesia, Brazil, Belarus, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Serbia and UAE -- and they demonstrate some of the highest rates of effectiveness.

          At the same time, based on the analysis of the global media, European and American vaccines clearly have their flaws and these facts have already been widely reported.

          The British Astrazeneca vaccine of Oxford University was temporarily banned in a number of European countries due to concerns over blood clots after vaccination. The American vaccine from Moderna is capable of causing skin inflammation more than 10 days after the first dose (according to a letter from the researchers, published in the New England Journal of Medicine) and is difficult to transport due to the fact that the vaccine must be stored at temperatures no higher than -80 C. Chinese vaccines, however, can be stored in conventional refrigerators. It's already a proven fact that Chinese vaccines are highly effective, while the efficacy rate of the Astrazeneca vaccine, actively used in Europe, is only 60 percent.

          The EU is deliberately putting forward a whole "package" of claims against China's actions, fearing that the much more effective, safe and easy-to-use Chinese vaccines will oust vaccines developed in the US, Britain and the EU from the European market. But this may well happen regardless.

          At the same time, by actively blocking Chinese vaccines, the EU leadership is now, in fact, endangering the lives and health of its citizens. At this time, when most of the European countries are experiencing a serious shortage of vaccines, the EU is deliberately shielding its citizens from the possibility of vaccination with highly effective and proven vaccines made in China.

          Thus, given the dire situation with vaccine availability for Europeans, EU officials should view the Chinese vaccine as an important tool to accelerate vaccination in the European Union. And this comes as the next wave of the pandemic is pummeling the region. In terms of the proportion of those vaccinated, the EU countries are inferior not only to those leading in vaccinations, but also to the UK, which recently left the European Union. Due to its obvious lack of vaccine production capacities, the EU should abandon its attacks and turn to China with a proposal for cooperation in the supply of vaccines to the European market. And this would be the most reasonable decision in the framework of the notorious policy of "vaccine diplomacy".

          Seymur Mammadov is the director of the international expert club EurAsiaAz and editor-in-chief of Azerbaijan's news agency Vzglyad.az.

          The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

          If you have a specific expertise and would like to contribute to China Daily, please contact us at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 蜜桃草视频免费在线观看| 91超碰在线精品| 国产乱色国产精品免费视频 | 日韩AV高清在线看片| 影音先锋女人AA鲁色资源| 国产色a在线观看| 西西人体44rt大胆高清张悠雨| 另类性姿势bbwbbw| 日本成熟少妇喷浆视频| 老司机亚洲精品一区二区| 国产欧美久久一区二区| 久久国产热这里只有精品| 日本亚洲一区二区精品久久| 中文字幕久久六月色综合| 国产成人av电影在线观看第一页| 国产中文字幕日韩精品| 亚洲男女内射在线播放| 无码av不卡免费播放| 亚洲午夜久久久影院伊人| 亚洲专区在线观看第三页| 和尚伦流澡到高潮h在线观看| 一本久道久久综合婷婷五月| 国产亚洲av夜间福利香蕉149| 成人自拍小视频免费观看| 久久亚洲精精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品午夜福利| 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区欧| 国产精品免费AⅤ片在线观看| 久久 国产 尿 小便 嘘嘘| 2020国产在线视精品在| 精品亚洲男人一区二区三区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频综合| 日韩无矿砖一线二线卡乱| 亚洲男女羞羞无遮挡久久丫| 亚洲 日本 欧洲 欧美 视频| 久久国语对白| 97亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另类图片| 亚洲国产成人精品毛片九色| √天堂资源在线中文8在线最新版 亚洲午夜成人精品电影在线观看 日本高清视频网站www | 国产AV影片麻豆精品传媒| 国产高清一区二区不卡|