<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Heated debate triggered as more US colleges go 'test optional'

          By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2022-05-02 08:16
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          A student majoring in biology works during a class break at California State University in November 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

          Student barriers

          The SAT costs $55 for the 2021-22 school year. Gabrielle Piccirilli, who is majoring in English at Villanova University, wrote in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal that high schools often encourage students to take exams multiple times to improve their scores, and these costs are barriers to low-income students "scoring as high as their intelligence allows".

          "A student who can take the SAT four times after rigorous test-specific prep will have a better shot than one who can only afford to take it once without preparation outside of schooling-even if they are equally smart," Piccirilli wrote.

          Schools seeking to diversify their student body are also concerned that test scores are often closely linked to a student's race and wealth.

          A study in 2020 by researchers at the Brookings Institution found a wide racial gap in SAT results, particularly in math.

          According to an investigation by the institution into the SAT math scores for more than 2.1 million high school graduates in 2020, white students scored an average of 93 points higher than black students, and 69 points higher than Hispanic or Latino students. Asian students scored 85 points higher than white students.

          Of those scoring more than 700 points in the 800-point math test, 43 percent were Asian and 45 percent white, while 6 percent were Hispanic or Latino, and 1 percent black.

          "Black, Hispanic or Latino students routinely score lower in the math section of the SAT-a likely result of generations of exclusionary housing, education and economic policy-which too often means that rather than reducing existing racial gaps, using the test in college admissions reinforces them," researchers said in their report. "While attempting to measure college readiness, the SAT both mirrors and maintains racial inequity."

          These findings echo an analysis by Georgetown University researchers in 2019, who found that if the most selective US colleges and universities relied solely on SAT scores for admission decisions, their campuses would be wealthier, whiter and have more male students.

          The biggest losers were black and Latino students, whose numbers would be cut nearly in half, with the principal winners being wealthy white male students, whose ranks would increase, according to the analysis.

          After dropping the standardized testing requirement, some universities have seen significant increases in applications for admissions. The University of California received record-level applications for autumn last year and admitted its largest and most diverse undergraduate intake ever, according to its president's office.

          Cornell University reported that it enrolled a more diverse intake, including a nearly 50 percent rise in the proportion of first-generation college students-those whose parents did not complete a four-year college or university degree.

          The University of Chicago shifted to test-optional admissions in 2018 to expand diversity. Its current intake of freshmen has 56 percent more black students, 26 percent more Hispanic and Latino students, 33 percent more rural students and 36 percent more first-generation students than the intake that enrolled before the policy change.

          |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next   >>|
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 丁香婷婷色综合激情五月| 久久久久成人精品无码中文字幕| av小次郎网站| 美女黄网站视频免费视频| 色偷偷www.8888在线观看| 亚洲人成小说网站色在线| 精品国产人成亚洲区| 国产精品一级久久黄色片| 精品精品亚洲高清a毛片| 一本高清码二区三区不卡| 亚洲精品综合网二三区| 无码成人午夜在线观看| 亚洲 日本 欧洲 欧美 视频| 2021国产成人精品久久| 色天天天综合网色天天| 韩国无码av片在线观看| 麻豆天美东精91厂制片| 人妻丰满熟妇无码区免费| 超清无码一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品国产精品婷婷| 中文字幕精品1在线| 亚洲欧美牲交| 欧美日本在线| 色综合AV综合无码综合网站| 亚洲色大成网站WWW尤物| 久久人人爽人人人人片av| 韩国福利视频一区二区三区| 欧美色欧美亚洲高清在线观看| 国产精品疯狂输出jk草莓视频| 久9视频这里只有精品| 成本人视频免费网站| 动漫AV纯肉无码AV电影网| 国产中文欧美日韩在线| 亚洲综合黄色的在线观看| 麻豆国产va免费精品高清在线 | 91小视频在线播放| 国产一卡2卡三卡4卡免费网站| 好男人2019在线视频播放观看| 四虎库影成人在线播放| 国产又大又黑又粗免费视频| 久久综合偷拍视频五月天|