<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Global Views

          Common prosperity should start early

          By DORIEN EMMERS/SCOTT ROZELLE | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-11-02 08:37
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

          Rural children start lagging behind urban ones before they turn three, underlining the need to solve China's urban-rural human capital inequality to escape the middle-income trap

          According to World Bank data, only a handful of economies have risen from middle- to high-income status since 1960, when economic catch-up growth took off in many developing economies. Examples include the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Israel and Ireland. Some countries that were high income in 1960, such as Canada and France, remain so today. Some that were poor, such as Cambodia and Tanzania, have stayed poor. And then there are many countries that have maintained their middle-income status for decades, seemingly unable to reach high-income status. They are in what is called the middle-income trap.

          One key factor that may account for disparate development paths among nations is education. Having a large supply of educated workers ensures that enough talent exists to meet and drive demand for high-value goods and services that drive an economy when it becomes a high-income one, thereby sustaining growth. When too many unskilled workers are squeezed out of upgraded industries, their wages tend to stagnate or fall, curtailing demand and hampering growth. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, in countries that graduated to high-income status, 72 percent of the working age population (18-65 years) had completed secondary education when the country was still in the middle-income status. In countries that are stuck in the middle-income trap, the share of the working-age population with a secondary education was much lower — only 36 percent on average.

          How does China compare to countries in the middle-income trap? Since the beginning of the opening-up and reform in 1978, China has undergone remarkable development. After four decades of strong economic growth, even with double-digit growth rates, China has become the second-largest economy (in terms of nominal GDP), the largest exporter, and the second-largest importer in the world. However, China's growth has relied heavily on unskilled labor. For all of its investment in physical infrastructure, for decades China failed to invest enough in the education and health of a large share of its people.

          Education attainment metrics help reveal China's potential future development and growth trajectory. According to China's 2015 micro-census data, about 450 to 500 million people in China between the ages of 18 and 65, which is 70 percent of the labor force, have never attended even one day of high school.

          A large population of uneducated workers was not a problem while China was moving from low- to middle-income status. Unskilled labor was in high demand. Unskilled wages were low and low-cost manufacturing and construction sectors were on the upswing. But China's growth model has been changing over the past decade or more. Unskilled wages are growing higher, so foreign investors have begun shifting their attention toward other countries with cheaper labor. China's own massive push to automate is also rendering low-skilled workers redundant.

          Recognizing the critical need for widespread education, the Chinese government expanded access to high school throughout the country in the mid-2000s. High school attainment among the youngest cohorts in the labor force is close to 80 percent. But hundreds of millions of less educated people will remain in the labor force for the next 30 years. The government will face huge challenges trying to either retrain workers or provide a social safety net.

          The quality of China's expanded secondary school education is also uncertain. Most low-skilled labor comes from rural areas, where school and health systems are under-resourced due to the legacy of national policies. Historically, a higher share of public investments in infrastructure and services has been channel-led toward urban areas.

          Systemic shortfalls in the education and health of young children in rural areas may also render many young people unprepared to learn complex skills as they age. In large-scale field studies conducted by research groups in rural primary schools across rural areas of Central and Western China over the past decade, more than a quarter of school children were found to be anemic; one out of five was myopic (and did not have eyeglasses); and one out of four had intestinal worms threatening their nutritional status and cognitive development. These education and health gaps have been found to open up even earlier, before children enter primary school. Rural children start lagging behind in their development during the first years of life. A systematic review and meta-analysis calculated in 2021 that the risk of delay in early cognitive development and language function amounts to 45 percent before age 5 in rural study sites across China.

          Parenting programs focusing on cognitive stimulation during early childhood are a promising tool to tackle root causes of educational and health inequities in resource-poor settings. Studies have shown that parenting programs can benefit child development in developing regions such as rural China in the short run, as well as a range of adult outcomes in the longer run, including lifetime educational attainment. Therefore, policymakers no longer debate the effectiveness of such programs, only how such quality programs can be delivered cost-effectively, sustainably, and at scale.

          The Chinese government has announced its intention to steer China on a path toward common prosperity. China eradicated extreme poverty in 2020. However, 600 million Chinese had a monthly per capita income of $140 or less in 2020. In the face of these remaining challenges, China's central leadership promotes the phrase "common prosperity "since 2021. This signals an intent to curtail income inequality and excessive wealth accumulation by individuals, while helping people to achieve a better standard of living. Certainly, the poverty alleviation efforts over the past several years have raised standards of living. In addition, "rural vitalization" plans have so far focused on diversifying the incomes of rural residents. Innovation in the digital space has also been a key ingredient to enable farmers to sell their products online. These policies all have benefited rural China and led to overall reductions in inequality. However, a very real rural-urban gap in human capital remains. Investing in the developmental opportunities of disadvantaged children can play an important role in further improving social mobility and building the large, high-skilled labor force China will need to support a strong, innovation-driven economy in the future.

          The risks of a stagnating China would reverberate far beyond its shores. China's sheer size — one-fifth of the world's population — means what happens there will have outsized implications for foreign trade, global supply chains, financial markets and growth around the world. No assessment of China's growth is complete without considering the implications of China having hundreds of millions of underemployed people in its economy for the foreseeable future.

          Dorien Emmers is an assistant professor at the Chinese Studies Group and the Department of Economics of KU Leuven. Scott Rozelle is the Helen F. Farnsworth senior fellow and the co-director of the Rural Education Action Program in the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University and a recipient of the Friendship Award of the Chinese Government. The authors contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

          Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 自拍偷自拍亚洲一区二区| 国产高清在线不卡一区| 2020久久国产综合精品swag| 精产国品一二三产区别手机 | 日本道高清一区二区三区| 一区二区三区成人| 亚洲精品乱码免费精品乱| 午夜男女爽爽影院在线| 国产国产精品人体在线视| 国产欧美在线观看一区| 精品人妻系列无码天堂| 忘忧草www日本韩国| 欧美成人在线免费| 国产久9视频这里只有精品| 免费看成人毛片无码视频| 国产伦视频一区二区三区| 人妻少妇无码精品专区| 国产成人精品手机在线观看| 国产成人最新三级在线视频| 亚洲一级特黄大片在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区日韩精品| 9lporm自拍视频区| 韩国一级毛片中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品综合久久网络| 国产黄色av一区二区三区| 国产三级精品三级在线观看| 国产精品自拍视频第一页| 国语精品一区二区三区| 精品无码一区在线观看| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠ds005| 九九热精品免费视频| 精品国产肉丝袜在线拍国语| 日本熟妇色xxxxx日本免费看| 中文字幕在线亚洲日韩6页| 深夜视频国产在线观看| 日韩丝袜欧美人妻制服| 成人国产精品视频频| 少妇高潮水多太爽了动态图| 中文字幕人妻第一区| 亚洲无线码一区二区三区| 国产免费踩踏调教视频|