<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
          China in liquidity double-bind with US treasury bonds
          By Tonny Yu (China Daily)
          Updated: 2009-06-08 11:49

          US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner made the most of his first Beijing visit to lobby China to continue expanding its forex reserve portfolio in US treasury bonds, securities widely regarded to be low risk and highly liquid. Rating agencies Moody's and Standard & Poor's class them as AAA, the highest possible.

          Geithner is the first US treasury secretary to make a trip to sell treasuries in the history of Sino-US diplomatic relations and a rare event in world financial history. Geithner's Beijing visit itself provides a hint about real concerns - so-called risk-free treasuries are no longer immune from risk.

          Related readings:
          China in liquidity double-bind with US treasury bonds Purchases of US bonds likely to continue
          China in liquidity double-bind with US treasury bonds US treasury chief pursues closer economic ties with China

          Government bonds are securities issued by a nation and backed by the country's fiscal revenues and sovereign credit. As with a company, a government could be in a situation where the value of all its possessions does not equal its total debts. Examples include a funding crisis in Great Britain before development of the North Sea Oilfield and fiscal emergencies in Southeast Asia during the 1997 financial crisis.

          Current bankruptcy moves by century-old automaker General Motors, once a symbol of US economic prowess, signals how the US financial crisis has escalated into a wider economic crisis.

          Ongoing economic woes no doubt enlarge the bankruptcy risk at the US government itself. Is the US treasury still a safe security?

          It is a question for China itself.

          Americans, including Moody's and Standard and Poor's, are not the right ones to answer the question. When borrowing money, most people make sweet promises. That also applies to Geithner.

          His Beijing visit provides more evidence that the issue is not solely about the economy. It has been enlarged to a political issue and connects other national interests of China. Structural problems in China's forex reserve system mean that it can only concede on this issue to negotiate with the US for gains on other national interests.

          The original purpose of parking China's reserves in US treasuries was due to their high liquidity. About $700 billion of China's nearly $2 trillion in reserves has been invested in US treasury securities.

          If China decided to sell off its treasuries holdings, it will scarcely be able to dump it in large blocks. A partial sell off will surely lead to a slump in the treasury market, eroding the remaining value of China's portfolio.

          China has no other way but sustained depletion of forex reserves in small amounts. It is estimated that it will be hard for China to sell off its current treasuries holdings for at least the next two years.

          The issue is currently an intertwined cycle: the Chinese government is keeping enormous amounts of US treasuries, so the risk to its foreign reserve liquidity increases while the US issues new treasuries making the liquidity risk is worse.

          It might be similar to lending money to a rich man to whom one has to keep lending due to worries about him returning previous debts. In such a situation, lenders should strive for more tangible assets as collateral.

          The way out of the issue is for the US government to extricate itself from the economic crisis, raise its governmental credit and enable appreciation of its treasury securities so the Chinese government can cash in its holdings.

          To maintain a liquid forex reserve, China's government should eliminate its misunderstanding of US treasuries as the only form to coordinate Sino-US bilateral interests. An alternative has been demonstrated by the Canadian government taking a stake in GM. Stake injection could see China moderately adjust the structure of its forex reserves, yet could also be an alternative way to help the US economy.

          The Chinese government could consider taking a stake in a US financial firm at a relatively low price - such as China Investment Corp injecting capital that is convertible into a stake of investment bank Morgan Stanley. History shows that a high quality stake in financial firms might be best acquired at times of crisis.

          The author Tonny Yu is a partner at Winwings Consulting Ltd and a former forex trader with Bank of China and manager at Pricewaterhousecoopers. The views expressed are his own.


          (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

           

           

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品久久久天堂麻豆宅男 | 国内在线视频一区二区三区| 国产成人av一区二区三区不卡| 久久久欧美国产精品人妻噜噜| 国产啪在线91| 麻豆一区二区三区蜜桃免费| 国产色a在线观看| 久久精产国品一二三产品| 国产在线高清视频无码| 在线观看国产成人av天堂| 人妻av无码系列一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品综合在线一区| 亚洲特黄色片一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲精品色婷婷| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 亚洲人成电影在线天堂色| 免费无码黄网站在线看| 在线免费成人亚洲av| 日韩精品一二区在线视频| 动漫AV纯肉无码AV电影网| 亚州av综合色区无码一区| 蜜臀av一区二区国产精品| 免费无遮挡毛片中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲| 国产亚欧女人天堂AV在线| 四虎永久在线精品无码视频| 日本一区二区三区专线| 久久精品人人做人人爽97| 婷婷久久香蕉五月综合加勒比 | 日本在线观看视频一区二区三区| 一区二区不卡99精品日韩| 日日爽日日操| 色综合天天综合婷婷伊人| 欧洲亚洲国内老熟女超碰| 国产极品精品自在线不卡| 国产精品∧v在线观看| 欧美肥老太交视频免费| 人妻精品动漫h无码| 伦伦影院精品一区| 国产精品女同一区二区久| 人妻系列无码专区69影院|