<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Reform nation's coal mines

          Updated: 2011-09-21 07:54

          By Da Sulin (China Daily)

            Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

          Ineffective supervision and weak law enforcement deeply rooted in the pursuit of profit result in too many lives lost

          Figures show China has the worst safety record of all leading coal producers worldwide. And the situation lacks fundamental improvement in recent years. In 2009, China's coal production accounted for 37 percent of the world's total, but related deaths accounted for almost 70 percent, an official from the National Energy Bureau said.

          What made mining coal in China so dangerous?

          The primary cause lies in investors' unwillingness and inability to promote worker safety. Safety investment is a huge cost for a colliery. If the codes are strictly obeyed, the initial investment for even a small colliery with a producing capacity of 300,000 tons per year can exceed 100 million yuan. Most coal-producing countries set a high entry threshold for the industry because only long-term investors under strict supervision will take measures to ensure safety for workers.

          But this is not the case in China, where there are two kinds of collieries: State-owned and township mines.

          The former, directly managed and run by local governments, have a double identity as profit-seekers in the market economy and contributors to State coffers. Not many people responsible for accidents in State-owned collieries have been severely punished.

          Most township coal mines are small enterprises with backward technology and little capital. They owe their survival to the shortage of coal in China, which has lowered the entry threshold for the industry. A considerable number of these are actually running in legal gray areas. And they are more geographically dispersed, which makes it more difficult to supervise them. Therefore, investors in township collieries lack both the ability and the strong will to promote safety.

          Meanwhile, miners have yet to acquire the ability to negotiate for better safety conditions. Most, if not all, of the suffering miners are migrant workers, who, being inferior in the dual economy of urban and rural areas, are forced to exchange their labor for better living conditions for their families. All migrant workers understand how dangerous it is to work in a colliery, a job they describe as "digging coal from hell". But because they lack the skills and resources to find a job that provides equal pay, they have no other choice.

          To make matters worse, the migrant workers are often from different places and lack the knowledge and ability to form an alliance against mining investors. Therefore they have no ability to ask mine managers for safety measures.

          Considering the situation, the State should be providing the miners with assistance and protection. But loopholes in every part of China's colliery supervising system leave much room for improvement.

          First, laws governing colliery safety are far from effective. China's mine safety laws have long been famous for their tolerance of violators. The highest fine for breaking safety codes is only 200,000 yuan ($31,350) a negligible amount compared with a coal mine's huge profits. The heaviest penalty is seven years in jail, which is also very light compared with most other coal-producing countries. To make matters worse, not all people responsible for miners' deaths are fully punished.

          Besides, mine safety laws and regulations have only set basic principles and frameworks, but do not provide executable details. Thus, law enforcers often find it difficult to do their jobs. Even these rough law texts are often contradictory because they are coded by different government departments. This has further reduced the effectiveness of the law to maintain safety.

          Second, State supervisors are limited in their roles. To reduce costs, the State coal mine supervising departments have set up branches only in some main coal-producing areas and supervise mainly State-owned coal mines, thus leaving township coal mines alone.

          Most of the supervisors come from the coal industry administrations from which their department was recently separated. Complicated relations with colliery managers, especially those at the State-owned mines, have prevented them from independently supervising their former colleagues and ex-bosses.

          Even if the supervisors were willing to watch their former bosses, they lack the power to do so. The State supervisors have the power to fine, suspend or shut down collieries, but they can neither forcefully execute these punishments nor charge mine owners if they resist. The fact is only a few mines are shut for falling short of safety standards.

          With ample law enforcement resources and decisive influence over collieries within their territory, local governments are the only player in the game that can supervise them, but a strong will to do so is rare.

          This has its deep roots in the economic structure of the coal-producing areas.

          Most of China's collieries are in relatively underdeveloped regions where economic growth relies heavily upon selling resources. In the eyes of local officials, coal mines that offer great revenue are the best shortcut to promotion, and are thus worth protecting. The situation is often made worse in regions where corruption involves local officials investing in collieries.

          In other words, the guiding principle in a number of areas is that economic development has surpassed coal miners' lives in importance, deactivating China's supervision of coal mines.

          Only a thorough reform of the related legal system, economic structure and coal mining institutions will improve the safety situation.

          The author is a professor of public governance at Nanjing University.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产呦萝小初| 日韩精品有码中文字幕| 国产一区二区三中文字幕| 无码中文字幕av免费放| 男女男免费视频网站国产 | 国产亚洲欧美精品久久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩另类| 99热成人精品热久久66| 亚洲а∨精品天堂在线| 精品在免费线中文字幕久久| 午夜高清国产拍精品福利| 一区二区三区国产在线网站视频| 四虎国产精品永久一区高清| 中文字幕在线日韩一区| 亚洲午夜理论无码电影| 人妻丝袜无码专区视频网站| 免费AV片在线观看网址| 99视频精品羞羞色院| 久久成人国产精品免费软件| 四虎成人精品无码永久在线| 亚洲韩国精品无码一区二区三区| 成人av天堂男人资源站| 一区二区三区四区国产综合| 好男人官网资源在线观看| 色噜噜久久综合伊人一本| 国产SUV精品一区二区6| 亚洲精品岛国片在线观看| 午夜射精日本三级| 日韩卡一卡2卡3卡4卡| 中国精学生妹品射精久久 | 婷婷99视频精品全部在线观看 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线播放无码| 亚洲成片在线观看12345| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文 | 韩国免费a级毛片久久| 国产欧美在线观看一区| 成人日韩av不卡在线观看| 精品人妻中文av一区二区三区 | 国产不卡精品视频男人的天堂| 日本视频高清一道一区|