<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Business / View

          Give us fresh air, or give us death!

          By Victor Fung Keung from Hong Kong (China Daily) Updated: 2012-11-23 13:30

          Give us fresh air, or give us death!

          'Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!" were words in a speech made at the Virginia State legislature in 1763 by Patrick Henry, a state councilor. Henry's words swung the vote in favor of sending troops to join the Revolutionary War. I would urge some interest groups in Hong Kong to adopt this slogan - "Give us fresh air, or give us death" - and persuade our government to improve air quality in the city.

          Indeed, I strongly believe that Leung Chun-ying, Hong Kong's chief executive, will win the hearts of thousands, if he undertakes to make Hong Kong's air a bit easier to breathe.

          Am I an alarmist? I beg to differ. Hong Kong's air pollution, as measured by the concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in the air that we inhale, is almost three times higher than those in Sydney, New York and London. For God's sake, it is three times higher, not three percent or 30 percent!

          The city's Environmental Protection Department, or?EPD, since 2006 has set a target of "no days" with the air pollution index over the "very high" level of 100. In 2007, the number of days exceeding the "very high" level totalled 74. If you think the number of days has declined since, you are only day dreaming. Sadly, in 2011 the number of days exceeding the "very high" level was 175, up 136% from 2007.

          These numbers and criticisms come not from me but from the government's Audit Commission. It issued a report in mid-November, questioning the effectiveness of the commercial diesel vehicle replacement scheme introduced by the EPD in 2000. After spending HK$1.8 billion ($232.2 million), we still see 50,000 highly polluting vehicles (one-third of them are more than 17 years old) on the city's busy and congested roads.

          The Audit Commission in its report also cast doubt on using government (or taxpayers') money to help equip polluting buses which are close to the end of their lives with devices to cut down nitrogen dioxides levels.

          We know too well the sources of air pollution. We have too many vehicles on the roads and too many polluting trucks and buses; and we can't stop the heavily polluted air floating to Hong Kong across the Shenzhen River. Mr Leung's new government should have the fortitude to "tackle the bulls by the horns".

          There are three kinds of "bulls". The first kind of "bulls" are businessmen in Hong Kong. The government should tell them to replace their commercial vehicles which are more than 10 years old to help reduce pollution. The second type of "bulls" are middle class people. Licence fees for cars over seven years old should be doubled or trebled to encourage owners to switch to new cars which cause less pollution. It would be all the better if some owners give up driving.

          The third kind of "bulls" are the most fierce and hardest to tackle. These are factory owners in the Pearl River Delta. We can talk with the Guangdong provincial government to cut down the quantity of pollutants released by factories in the delta, but Hong Kong has no political muscle to get what we want. If there is no gentlemen's agreement (or having agreements that aren't workable), the Leung government is well-advised to resort to an "out of the box" approach.

          The Hong Kong government could establish a fund to reward factories in the Pearl River delta that voluntarily work to reduce pollution that they produce. If the factories achieve certain targets, we would give them a cash bonus. We have billions of dollars of reserves. Few people in the city would object to such an idea.

          Being a commentator, I must declare my own interest. I have suffered from having an allergy which is linked to bad air. My doctor gives me nasal sprays to stop my running nose but he warns me that the medicine is composed of steroids. Everybody knows that steroids are harmful to people's heath in the long term. To halt my nose from running (such as five minutes before a class that I teach begins), I have to swallow one or two Piriton pills, which has the side effect of making me drowsy for the whole day.

          Deep in my heart I often cry in despair: "Give me fresh air or give me death!"

          The author is coordinator of the B.S.Sc in financial journalism program at Hong Kong Baptist University.

          Hot Topics

          Editor's Picks
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品色内内在线播放| 久久精品| 国产一区二区三区不卡在线看| 国产高清午夜人成在线观看,| 欧美白人最猛性xxxxx| 国产精品污一区二区三区| 免费视频一区二区三区亚洲激情 | 亚洲一区在线成人av| 国产精品老年自拍视频| 日韩AV高清在线看片| 日本一区不卡高清更新二区| 国产无码高清视频不卡| 天天操天天噜| 国产精品天天看天天狠| 蜜桃av无码免费看永久| 毛片免费观看天天干天天爽 | 久久精品国产99久久久古代| 久久精品熟女亚洲av艳妇| 亚洲粉嫩av一区二区黑人| 性欧美vr高清极品| 精品无码久久久久国产电影| 欧美日本精品一本二本三区| 亚洲日韩性欧美中文字幕| 国产精品私拍99pans大尺度| 在线亚洲午夜片av大片| 国产精品一区高清在线观看| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码电影| 美女一区二区三区亚洲麻豆| 欧美三级不卡在线观线看高清| 亚洲欧洲日韩国内高清| 高清有码国产一区二区| a在线亚洲男人的天堂试看| 极品一区二区三区水蜜桃| 毛片无遮挡高清免费| 精品视频福利| 成人免费AA片在线观看| 久久综合精品国产丝袜长腿| 在线观看成人av天堂不卡| 国产乱人激情H在线观看| 日本成熟少妇喷浆视频| 国产精品无码无在线观看|