|
CHINA> Regional
![]() |
|
Controversy over retained lawyers report
By Xie Chuanjiao (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-07-29 09:03 The Keerqin district government of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region Monday denied a media report claiming it had retained dozens of lawyers so they would be unable to represent local people in cases filed against officials and government agencies. On Friday, China Comment magazine reported that since 2002, the district government has recruited almost 100 lawyers from seven law firms to work as legal consultants. "Under the agreements between the government and the law firms, lawyers could not accept cases in which a local official or government agency was the accused," the report said. The magazine cited the example of retired middle school teacher Chen Xian who in 2002 filed a lawsuit against the government after it ordered the demolition of his business to make way from a new development. However, Chen was unable to secure the services of a lawyer and was left to defend himself, the report said. After losing his case at both the local district and intermediate people's court, Chen was victorious at the high people's court of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region. China Comment quoted an anonymous lawyer as saying he "could never accept citizens' cases against officials or government agencies, as his firm acted as a legal consultant to the government". An official from the information office of the Keerqin district government, who refused to give his name, told China Daily yesterday the report was "distorted". "The report misunderstands what our officials said, and Chen Xian's case was concluded a long time ago and should not be used as an example," he said. "How could we sign an agreement forbidding lawyers to accept cases against government agencies?" The government is now trying to clarify the details of the report, the official said. A lawyer surnamed Wang from the Shangheng Law Firm in Keerqin district told China Daily the report was "subjective and one-sided". "Our firm is not contracted to the local government." "We will not tolerate such an infringement by the government into people's basic rights," he said. "If someone comes to me for help with such a case, I will take it," Wang said. Zhang Han, executive editor-in-chief with China Comment, told China Daily: "We never approve an article for publication without careful examination of its accuracy. "Those who have been exposed are now feeling the pain," he said. |
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品一区二区美女| 久久精品国产亚洲av大全相关| 欧美乱大交aaaa片if| 男女xx00上下抽搐动态图| 极品人妻少妇一区二区| 国产真实精品久久二三区| 国产精品无码2021在线观看| 日韩精品一区二区在线视| Y111111国产精品久久久| 在线看av一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区三级| 精品99在线观看| 日韩中文字幕人妻一区| 国产无遮挡18禁无码网站免费| 国产普通话对白刺激| 国产办公室秘书无码精品99| 亚洲国产精品一二三四五| caoporen国产91在线| 日韩精品久久久肉伦网站| 亚洲精品一区二区三区大| 亚洲精品天堂一区二区| 精品国产熟女一区二区三区| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路在线| 国产三级精品三级在线观看| 在线一区二区中文字幕| 中文无码妇乱子伦视频| 无码精油按摩潮喷在线播放| 久久先锋男人AV资源网站| 国产熟妇另类久久久久久| 精品人妻中文字幕在线| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水 | 日韩精品一区二区三区激| 夜夜爽夜夜叫夜夜高潮| av亚洲在线一区二区| 亚洲国产一区二区三区最新| 亚洲人成线无码7777| 人妻偷拍一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久荜中文字幕| 麻豆精品久久久久久久99蜜桃| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸|