<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          CHINA> National
          Let's dissect the media for a change
          By Li Xing (China Daily)
          Updated: 2009-10-22 07:48

          My friend Xu Haoyuan sent me two emails within a month about problems she encountered in news media coverage. Each illustrates how far some journalists nowadays have strayed from accuracy and truthfulness.

          Xu manages the Beijing-based Heart-to-Heart Center for Behavioral Science to promote public psychological health. In her first email, she talked about the loopholes the reporter left in an article published in a leading weekly news magazine in China. The article, based on an interview with her, narrated her experiences during the "cultural revolution" (1966-76).

          In addition to getting two people's names wrong, the reporter misinterpreted her impressions of the United States, Xu said. She made the accusations not only in her email to me and other friends, but also in her blog.

          The reporter wrote that Xu "went to further her studies in the United States, the country that touts the Glory and the Dream. There, she experienced democracy which was different from collectivism"

          The truth is, Xu said she became "very disappointed with the hypocritical 'democracy' in the US", and that she made her disappointment crystal clear upon her return to China.

          Xu has the right to be furious and to question why a young reporter not only misquoted her, but put words in her mouth, too. Through her blog, she has notified the public about the errors in the article.

          The second email, which she forwarded to me on Monday, was first sent out last Thursday by a renowned professor of political science at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. It contained a copy of a news analysis about this year's Nobel Prize for Economics, which was published in a leading Beijing-based business and economics newspaper.

          The author quoted two Chinese academics, one of who was the Chinese University professor, in his analysis of how Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom's research inspired Chinese economists to find solutions to a plethora of problems China faces in development. The author claimed that the quotes came from recent interviews, but this professor said in his email that he'd never given an interview.

          Sadly, these are not isolated cases. There is no single root cause for media inaccuracies. Instead, it's a confluence of factors.

          First, China's dramatic economic growth has transformed it so much that it is difficult for young reporters to understand events that took place before they were born. Although traditional journalism teaches aspiring young reporters to never take things for granted or make assumptions, some still do, thus making up their own interpretations without checking the facts.

          Second, as competition among the traditional and the new media becomes fiercer, some in the traditional media are giving up their long-held practice of checking the facts.

          As they cut budgets and rush to keep up with the Internet, many media organizations cannot afford the manpower or the time to check facts. Some media organizations just keep their reporters in the office by their phones and computers where they can use the Internet. They don't encourage them to go to obtain the information first-hand on a story.

          Above all, on the Internet, any private citizen can now report or blog about "news". When a young man went online and slandered his former girl friend, saying she was suffering from AIDS and sleeping with numerous men, quite a few Internet portals reported this as news in order to draw more hits or wider citation. Here accuracy and truthfulness are simply trampled.

          There is no simple solution for eliminating media inaccuracies and false reports. Even when we tighten ethical reviews among journalists in certified media outlets, there will still be millions of bloggers and self-appointed journalists on the Internet.

          The best society can do is to call on the people in the know to help correct the inaccuracies while raising public awareness of the journalistic code of conduct that makes it illegal to libel, slander or spread falsehood.

          lixing@chinadaily.com.cn

           

          主站蜘蛛池模板: www.91在线播放| 国产精品日日摸夜夜添夜夜添2021| 四虎成人高清永久免费看| 日韩高清免费一码二码三码| 一区二区三区国产综合在线| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 国产精品爆乳在线播放| 久久国产热精品波多野结衣av| 成人免费av色资源日日| 年轻漂亮的人妻被公侵犯bd免费版 | 久久精品www人人做人人爽| 国产高清亚洲精品视bt天堂频| 人妻出轨av中文字幕| 精品无码久久久久国产| 亚洲欧美在线综合一区二区三区| 亚洲色欲在线播放一区二区三区| 色欲av无码一区二区人妻| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 国产精品国产三级在线专区| 亚洲日韩av无码一区二区三区人| 91密桃精品国产91久久| 98精品全国免费观看视频| 亚洲综合色一区二区三区| 亚洲东京色一区二区三区| 国产中文字幕日韩精品| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码久久不卡| 亚洲69视频| 乱色熟女综合一区二区| 亚洲精品av无码喷奶水网站| 五月婷婷久久草| 国产精品午夜福利免费看| 美国又粗又长久久性黄大片| 国内精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美人成电影在线观看| 国产精品成人aaaaa网站| 国产成人欧美一区二区三区在线| 内射少妇36p九色| 福利一区二区三区视频在线| 精品国产福利久久久| 天堂网av成人在线观看| 亚洲av免费看一区二区|