<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Society

          Ban on bleaching agent considered

          By Wang Yan (China Daily)
          Updated: 2010-09-15 08:05
          Large Medium Small

          BEIJING - The Ministry of Health (MOH) is considering a ban on a popular flour bleaching agent in response to growing public concerns over the abusive use of the chemical whitening agent.

          The ministry is coordinating with relevant government departments to research the policies on benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as a flour additive, the Beijing News reported on Tuesday.

          The move came after the MOH completed a three-month bid to seek public suggestions on a draft revision to the current national standards on food additives.

          The ministry received nearly 100 suggestions from the public by the end of August, with some proposing a ban on BPO in flour production, said the report.

          BPO is often blended with corn flour to make the flour bleaching agent, which creates a white color.

          Ministry officials have been cooperating with the National Food Additives Standardization & Technology Committee (NFASTC) to research what effect the ban of BPO would have on industry and foreign trade, the Beijing News reported.

          Related readings:
          Ban on bleaching agent considered Unsafe ingredient in some flours
          Ban on bleaching agent considered Flour bleach may soon be banned

          The MOH approved the use of BPO in flour production in 1986, allowing up to 60 milligrams of BPO to be added to each kilogram of flour.

          However, growing food safety problems in recent years, such as the melamine added to milk powders that caused kidney stones in babies, have prompted more people to oppose the use of additives in the past few years.

          Ban on bleaching agent considered

          About 100 large flour-production companies appealed for a ban of whitening additives in flour in October 2008, one month after the disclosure of melamine-tainted Sanlu milk powder.

          The State Administration of Grain (SAG) has been against the use of BPO.

          "We have done lots of research and passed on suggestions to the health ministry several times," a staffer with the SAG policy and regulations department, who declined to be named, told China Daily on Tuesday.

          "Some other departments are also working with us to promote the issue, including the standardization administration."

          An employee at the general office of Beijing Guchuan Food Co, the largest flour production company in Beijing, told China Daily on Tuesday that in order to promote sales, the company had to add whitening agents into large packages of flour, but not small packs.

          "The whitening agents cost about 12,900 yuan ($1,897) for each ton, which actually adds to the expense of our company," she said.

          Sang Liwei, a Beijing-based food safety lawyer and the Beijing chief representative of the nonprofit Global Food Safety Forum, supports the ban on BPO.

          "It is not necessary to add bleaching agents to the flour. All it does is make it look white so consumers would like it more. Under the current production techniques, the flour is white enough even without bleaching agents," Sang said.

          He is also worried that some manufacturers will not strictly follow the standards in the use of BPO.

          "The fact is that we are not able to check each and every batch of the product yet," he said.

          In early April, investigations found that some bleaching agents widely used in flour production contain as much as 30 percent pulverized lime, a substance that has been linked to health problems.

          Even with the increasing pressure to ban BPO as an additive in flour, some scientists still believe that BPO should not be banned.

          Chen Junshi, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and also the director of the NFASTC, said that no evidence exists to prove that BPO is harmful to the human body, and that it is safe to eat, according to a report of Beijing-based Legal Weekly on Sept 1.

          Ding Jie contributed to this story.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 最新亚洲精品国偷自产在线| 猫咪网网站免费观看| 欧美成人在线免费| 亚洲人成网网址在线看| 四虎国产精品永久在线| 久久国产精品亚洲精品99| 婷婷综合亚洲| 日韩av熟女人妻一区二| 国产成人精品97| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放不卡| 成午夜福利人试看120秒| 国产女人水多毛片18| 中文字幕日韩精品国产| 超碰成人人人做人人爽| 国产精品亚洲第一区在线| 一区二区三区四区四色av| 一区二区亚洲人妻av| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 18禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 欧美 日韩 国产 成人 在线观看| 亚洲AV无码不卡在线播放| 一区二区视频观看在线| 中文字幕精品av一区二区五区| 99RE6在线观看国产精品| 人妻熟女一区二区aⅴ水野朝阳| 另类专区一区二区三区| 妲己丰满人熟妇大尺度人体艺| 色狠狠色婷婷丁香五月| 久久青草精品A片狠狠来| 亚洲精品一区二区五月天| 国产无套粉嫩白浆在线精品| 国产精品国产精品国产精品| 2020国产欧洲精品网站| 亚洲熟女国产熟女二区三区| 亚洲男人第一无码av网| 国产精品无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲av影院一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品日韩av专区 | chinese熟女老女人hd视频 | 久久男人av资源站| 精品国产片一区二区三区|