<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Society

          Ban on bleaching agent considered

          By Wang Yan (China Daily)
          Updated: 2010-09-15 08:05
          Large Medium Small

          BEIJING - The Ministry of Health (MOH) is considering a ban on a popular flour bleaching agent in response to growing public concerns over the abusive use of the chemical whitening agent.

          The ministry is coordinating with relevant government departments to research the policies on benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as a flour additive, the Beijing News reported on Tuesday.

          The move came after the MOH completed a three-month bid to seek public suggestions on a draft revision to the current national standards on food additives.

          The ministry received nearly 100 suggestions from the public by the end of August, with some proposing a ban on BPO in flour production, said the report.

          BPO is often blended with corn flour to make the flour bleaching agent, which creates a white color.

          Ministry officials have been cooperating with the National Food Additives Standardization & Technology Committee (NFASTC) to research what effect the ban of BPO would have on industry and foreign trade, the Beijing News reported.

          Related readings:
          Ban on bleaching agent considered Unsafe ingredient in some flours
          Ban on bleaching agent considered Flour bleach may soon be banned

          The MOH approved the use of BPO in flour production in 1986, allowing up to 60 milligrams of BPO to be added to each kilogram of flour.

          However, growing food safety problems in recent years, such as the melamine added to milk powders that caused kidney stones in babies, have prompted more people to oppose the use of additives in the past few years.

          Ban on bleaching agent considered

          About 100 large flour-production companies appealed for a ban of whitening additives in flour in October 2008, one month after the disclosure of melamine-tainted Sanlu milk powder.

          The State Administration of Grain (SAG) has been against the use of BPO.

          "We have done lots of research and passed on suggestions to the health ministry several times," a staffer with the SAG policy and regulations department, who declined to be named, told China Daily on Tuesday.

          "Some other departments are also working with us to promote the issue, including the standardization administration."

          An employee at the general office of Beijing Guchuan Food Co, the largest flour production company in Beijing, told China Daily on Tuesday that in order to promote sales, the company had to add whitening agents into large packages of flour, but not small packs.

          "The whitening agents cost about 12,900 yuan ($1,897) for each ton, which actually adds to the expense of our company," she said.

          Sang Liwei, a Beijing-based food safety lawyer and the Beijing chief representative of the nonprofit Global Food Safety Forum, supports the ban on BPO.

          "It is not necessary to add bleaching agents to the flour. All it does is make it look white so consumers would like it more. Under the current production techniques, the flour is white enough even without bleaching agents," Sang said.

          He is also worried that some manufacturers will not strictly follow the standards in the use of BPO.

          "The fact is that we are not able to check each and every batch of the product yet," he said.

          In early April, investigations found that some bleaching agents widely used in flour production contain as much as 30 percent pulverized lime, a substance that has been linked to health problems.

          Even with the increasing pressure to ban BPO as an additive in flour, some scientists still believe that BPO should not be banned.

          Chen Junshi, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and also the director of the NFASTC, said that no evidence exists to prove that BPO is harmful to the human body, and that it is safe to eat, according to a report of Beijing-based Legal Weekly on Sept 1.

          Ding Jie contributed to this story.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产午夜福利理论片| 免费观看全黄做爰大片| 亚洲中国精品精华液| 免费人成视频网站在线18| 亚洲av免费成人精品区| 久久99精品国产麻豆婷婷| 香蕉久久久久久久AV网站| 国产福利一区二区三区在线观看| 男女性高爱潮免费网站| 91娇喘视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品免费看| 国产毛片A啊久久久久| 色悠悠国产在线视频一线| 干老熟女干老穴干老女人| 在线观看潮喷失禁大喷水无码| 四虎永久免费很黄的视频| 无码综合天天久久综合网| 国产成人8X人网站视频| 最近中文字幕在线视频1| 精品日韩人妻中文字幕| 人妻熟女久久久久久久| 亚洲精品一区二区三区色| 伊人天天久大香线蕉av色| 蜜臀精品视频一区二区三区| 国产在线观看免费观看不卡| 人妻无码| 国产普通话对白刺激| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 日产精品一区二区三区免费| 青青草视频华人绿色在线| 在线A毛片免费视频观看| 日韩在线播放中文字幕| 亚洲国产成人资源在线| av毛片| 国产精品中文字幕第一区| 97精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产蜜臀av在线一区在线| 国产日韩精品欧美一区灰| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又精品视| 国产乱妇乱子视频在播放| 国产精品精品一区二区三|