<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          China / Society

          Better supervision of research urged

          By Wang Qingyun (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 09:03

          Genetically modified rice project reveals lack of scientific ethics

          The controversial genetically modified rice experiment in Hunan province shows that science research projects in China need tighter supervision, said Deng Haihua, a spokesman for the Ministry of Health.

          "The incident has revealed that individual scientific researchers lack understanding of laws and self-discipline regarding scientific ethics. Some individual projects have not been well supervised by the institutes responsible," Deng said on Wednesday. "The ministry has required institutes to improve the supervision of their projects while encouraging international cooperation in scientific research."

          The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement on Dec 6 saying that researchers in an experiment on Vitamin A efficiency - which tested genetically modified rice on schoolchildren in Hengyang, Hunan, in May and June 2008 - kept health authorities and subjects in the dark.

          Guangwen Tang, a researcher at Tufts University in the United States who was responsible for the project, brought the GM rice to China for the experiment.

          Tang and her Chinese counterparts in charge of the project told the parents that their children would eat "rice rich in carotenoid" and "purposely concealed" the fact that the rice was genetically modified, said the statement.

          The China CDC also said authorities learned in July 2008 that the experiment used GM rice and they conducted an investigation, but Yin Shi'an from China CDC's institute of nutrition and food safety and Wang Yin from the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, the other two in charge of the experiment, "lied and said the research had not started yet".

          In August, Tang published a paper on beta-carotene in GM rice in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which she co-wrote with others, including Yin and Wang, in which she cited the experiment in Hunan in 2008, saying the study recruitment processes and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board, Tufts Medical Center and the Ethics Review Committee of the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences in China.

          The Zhejiang academy admitted on Sept 7 that its committee of ethics had approved the project in 2003, but it had no idea that its experiment in 2008 tested GM rice.

          Yin and Wang were fired for academic misconduct.

          Hu Yuming, a researcher at the Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, another Chinese author of the paper, was fired as the assistant director of the center for slack supervision of the experiment.

          Yin admitted in an interview with China Central Television that aired on Dec 8 that the project's team translated "golden rice", a type of GM rice, into "rice containing rich carotene" in the Chinese version of the informed consent agreed to by the parents in an attempt to avoid sensitivity.

          Zhai Xiaomei, a member of the medical ethics expert committee under the Ministry of Health, believed that part of the reason for concealing the fact that the rice was genetically modified may be people's irrational fear about GM food, though food such as oil made from GM soy beans has been widely sold in China.

          "There is not yet evidence showing GM food is either safe or hazardous," she said. "However, they were not justified in keeping the subjects and their parents in the dark. One of the prerequisites to conducting such experiments is consent based on total information."

          The Health Ministry in 2007 issued a regulation on ethics reviews of biomedical experiments on humans, stipulating that nobody is allowed to trick or threaten people into agreeing to be subjects, and that the subject has the right to back out at any stage of the experiment.

          Besides deliberately lowering the standards in an ethics review, ethics committees, especially those at grassroots medical institutes, lack the capacity to judge the validity of an experiment, Zhai said.

          "Grassroots workers need more training to prevent similar incidents from happening," she said.

          wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

          Highlights
          Hot Topics

          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩精品高清自在线| av亚洲一区二区在线| 夜色福利站WWW国产在线视频 | 麻豆精品久久精品色综合| 婷婷丁香五月亚洲中文字幕| 天堂在线最新版在线天堂| 中文字幕亚洲国产精品| 日韩精品有码中文字幕| 国产乱子伦视频在线播放| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 大香伊蕉在人线国产最新2005 | 丰满人妻一区二区三区色| 亚洲香蕉网久久综合影视| 另类图片亚洲人妻中文无码| 国产成年码AV片在线观看| 国产精品爱久久久久久久| 韩国无码AV片午夜福利| 国产精品SM捆绑调教视频| 国产中文三级全黄| 国产人免费人成免费视频| 亚洲精品一区久久久久一品av| 久久96热在精品国产高清| 久久亚洲色WWW成人欧美| 亚洲一区二区国产精品视频| 免费男人j桶进女人p无遮挡动态图| a网站在线观看| 国产精品制服丝袜白丝| 亚洲一本大道在线| 国产精品亚洲综合一区二区| av无码精品一区二区乱子| 视频一区二区不中文字幕| 亚洲欧美综合精品二区| 精品人妻伦一二三区久久aaa片| 国产精品青草视频免费播放| 中文字幕精品亚洲字幕资源网| 入禽太深在线观看免费高清| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文| 制服丝袜国产精品| 亚洲一区在线观看青青蜜臀| 99精品热在线在线观看视| 十八禁国产精品一区二区|