<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          China / Society

          Better supervision of research urged

          By Wang Qingyun (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 09:03

          Genetically modified rice project reveals lack of scientific ethics

          The controversial genetically modified rice experiment in Hunan province shows that science research projects in China need tighter supervision, said Deng Haihua, a spokesman for the Ministry of Health.

          "The incident has revealed that individual scientific researchers lack understanding of laws and self-discipline regarding scientific ethics. Some individual projects have not been well supervised by the institutes responsible," Deng said on Wednesday. "The ministry has required institutes to improve the supervision of their projects while encouraging international cooperation in scientific research."

          The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement on Dec 6 saying that researchers in an experiment on Vitamin A efficiency - which tested genetically modified rice on schoolchildren in Hengyang, Hunan, in May and June 2008 - kept health authorities and subjects in the dark.

          Guangwen Tang, a researcher at Tufts University in the United States who was responsible for the project, brought the GM rice to China for the experiment.

          Tang and her Chinese counterparts in charge of the project told the parents that their children would eat "rice rich in carotenoid" and "purposely concealed" the fact that the rice was genetically modified, said the statement.

          The China CDC also said authorities learned in July 2008 that the experiment used GM rice and they conducted an investigation, but Yin Shi'an from China CDC's institute of nutrition and food safety and Wang Yin from the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, the other two in charge of the experiment, "lied and said the research had not started yet".

          In August, Tang published a paper on beta-carotene in GM rice in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which she co-wrote with others, including Yin and Wang, in which she cited the experiment in Hunan in 2008, saying the study recruitment processes and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board, Tufts Medical Center and the Ethics Review Committee of the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences in China.

          The Zhejiang academy admitted on Sept 7 that its committee of ethics had approved the project in 2003, but it had no idea that its experiment in 2008 tested GM rice.

          Yin and Wang were fired for academic misconduct.

          Hu Yuming, a researcher at the Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, another Chinese author of the paper, was fired as the assistant director of the center for slack supervision of the experiment.

          Yin admitted in an interview with China Central Television that aired on Dec 8 that the project's team translated "golden rice", a type of GM rice, into "rice containing rich carotene" in the Chinese version of the informed consent agreed to by the parents in an attempt to avoid sensitivity.

          Zhai Xiaomei, a member of the medical ethics expert committee under the Ministry of Health, believed that part of the reason for concealing the fact that the rice was genetically modified may be people's irrational fear about GM food, though food such as oil made from GM soy beans has been widely sold in China.

          "There is not yet evidence showing GM food is either safe or hazardous," she said. "However, they were not justified in keeping the subjects and their parents in the dark. One of the prerequisites to conducting such experiments is consent based on total information."

          The Health Ministry in 2007 issued a regulation on ethics reviews of biomedical experiments on humans, stipulating that nobody is allowed to trick or threaten people into agreeing to be subjects, and that the subject has the right to back out at any stage of the experiment.

          Besides deliberately lowering the standards in an ethics review, ethics committees, especially those at grassroots medical institutes, lack the capacity to judge the validity of an experiment, Zhai said.

          "Grassroots workers need more training to prevent similar incidents from happening," she said.

          wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

          Highlights
          Hot Topics

          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品成人午夜福利| 偷拍一区二区三区在线视频| 国产亚洲精品成人无码精品网站| 亚洲av无码乱码国产麻豆穿越| 国产一级特黄性生活大片| 无遮无挡爽爽免费视频| 九九热在线免费播放视频| 国产精品久久福利新婚之夜| 91麻豆亚洲国产成人久久| 宅男噜噜噜66在线观看| 无码中文字幕加勒比高清| 亚洲乱妇老熟女爽到高潮的片| 偷拍精品一区二区三区| 少妇人妻88久久中文字幕 | 成全我在线观看免费第二季| 久久88香港三级台湾三级播放| AV免费网址在线观看| ........天堂网www在线| 高清有码国产一区二区| 日本高清一区二区在线观看| 日本中文一二区有码在线| 久久国产精品免费一区| 精品视频一区二区福利午夜| 在线免费播放av观看| 欧美日韩免费专区在线观看| 欧美大胆老熟妇乱子伦视频| 午夜性又黄又爽免费看尤物| 深夜在线观看免费av| аv天堂最新中文在线| 九九热在线观看视频精品| 亚洲第一色网站| 久久综合老鸭窝色综合久久| 国产精品成人av电影不卡| 天干天干夜啦天干天干国产| 亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡| 久久一日本道色综合久久| 亚洲国产成人久久综合野外| 久久99久久精品视频| 国产综合色产在线视频欧美| 免费永久在线观看黄网站| 亚洲精品免费一二三区|