<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          New immigrants don't deserve the hardships they face

          Updated: 2012-08-11 06:10

          By Thomas Chan(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Poverty in Hong Kong is found mostly among the aged and new immigrants. For the elderly, the cause is the lack of provision for pensions in the local welfare system. Although the government recently introduced MPF (Mandatory Provident Fund), it is too little and too late to help those who already have advanced into their senior years.

          The elderly are generally better off than new immigrants who live in poverty. Despite the stipulation in the Basic Law that Hong Kong residents have the right to social welfare in accordance with law, the same law also requires residency in Hong Kong for seven years to qualify. The elderly have access to social welfare provisions, albeit inadequate. The new immigrants and their children are not eligible if they have not lived continuously in Hong Kong for seven years even if they have fulfilled all other requirements to become a permanent resident. In other words, in the seven years before they become permanent residents, they are second class citizens, deprived of the social citizenship bestowed by the Basic Law.

          New immigrants don't deserve the hardships they face

          It is this group of immigrants in the low income group that has no support from the society to reduce their distress and all other negative consequences arising from poverty. The Basic Law stipulates that anyone living in Hong Kong continuously for seven years and taking Hong Kong as his permanent home would be eligible to become permanent citizens. Their political status and eligibility for social citizenship are the same as the new immigrants who have already been accepted by the society to become permanent residents from the time they arrive in Hong Kong. Still they must undergo a seven-year "internship". There may be a need for a process of naturalization for the new immigrants, but why has it to take seven years? For non-immigrants who become permanent residents, the seven-year "internship" is reasonable, but for immigrants who have already gone through a process of acceptance for naturalization, the period of waiting should be reduced.

          It is true that due to historical factors, many of the new immigrants belong to low income groups and may not immediately be employable in Hong Kong. Allowing them access to social citizenship would mean higher welfare expenditures. However, poverty entails all kinds of social, family and individual problems that could eventually cost the society much more. More importantly, social welfare is not charity. As enshrined by the Basic Law it is a right under social citizenship. By denying them of the rights means treating them as second class citizens, which is contrary to goals of social inclusion and solidarity that social citizenship aims to foster.

          A more recent conception of social welfare or social citizenship is social investment in human capital. As these new immigrants will be eligible to become permanent residents after seven years, it would be beneficial for the society to invest in them, including the children, before rather than after seven years of poverty. In Hong Kong we have found pockets of new immigrants living in poverty concentrated in some districts with signs of deteriorating into slumps with all the associated social and economic problems.

          Any social account will show that the social costs of letting these new immigrants and their families live in poverty for seven long years will be much higher than the actual welfare spending for seven years. Worst still, the effect on children growing up in those families and the impact on family relationships including marriage will trap new immigrants in poverty, even after granting them social welfare benefits. They would form separate groups of people in society that will suffer from almost permanent social exclusion and are likely to become a major source of crime and disorder in the future if not in the present.

          So even though the Basic Law may not be changed to remove the seven-year residential requirements, the SAR government would and should set up welfare schemes to target the new immigrants living at the poverty line. The government has both the resources and obligation to extend social citizenship to them after granting them immigrant status.

          The author is head of China Business Centre, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

          (HK Edition 08/11/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产午夜福利精品久久不卡| 亚洲AV午夜成人无码电影| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区乱| 老司机久久99久久精品播放| 无码国内精品人妻少妇| 国内揄拍国内精品对久久| 四虎在线成人免费观看| 一本色道久久综合狠狠躁篇| 国产精品内射在线免费看| 国产成人一区二区视频免费| 欧美成人午夜精品免费福利| 欧美XXXX黑人又粗又长| 麻豆精品久久久久久久99蜜桃| 国产成人无码免费视频在线| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网无码| 色成年激情久久综合国产| 亚洲欧洲自拍拍偷综合| 大又大又粗又硬又爽少妇毛片| 国产真实乱对白精彩久久老熟妇女| 国产亚洲一二三区精品| 97夜夜澡人人爽人人模人人喊| 久久夜色精品亚洲国产av| 成年女人免费碰碰视频| 国产午夜精品福利91| 99久久无色码中文字幕| 91福利国产在线在线播放| 蜜臀av一区二区国产精品| 99精品国产成人一区二区 | 亚洲黄色一级片在线观看| 91免费精品国偷自产在线在线| 少妇被日自拍黄色三级网络| 久久精品一偷一偷国产| 精品国产一区二区色老头| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃不卡| 国产激情无码一区二区三区| 亚洲色欲或者高潮影院| 欧美成A高清在线观看| 国产一级av在线播放| 欧洲一区二区中文字幕| 国产又色又爽又黄的在线观看 | 国产精品SM捆绑调教视频|