<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Increasing social mobility, education opportunities in HK

          Updated: 2012-12-29 07:54

          By Ho Shun-Man(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          It has been said that Hong Kong is "down streaming", i.e., that the quality of life of the middle class has been deteriorating. In recent years, there have been occasional media reports suggesting that many youngsters are dissatisfied with their employment, income and upward mobility, and are losing their self-confidence.

          A study by the Hong Kong Professional and Senior Executives Association (HKPSEA) in 2010, (for which this author was one of the investigators), found that 21 percent of the post-80s generation had experienced downward mobility and 74 percent had experienced no mobility over the past five years. Over half of them believed that social mobility was worse than 15 years ago.

          Many social leaders argue that social equality and mobility should be a major agenda item for the current administration. Higher social mobility is usually associated with more equal opportunities for all, greater recognition of personal effort and higher work motivation. In contrast, insufficient social mobility is associated with negative consequences, such as greater dissatisfaction over the gap between the rich and poor, lower social harmony and lower personal motivation to work hard.

          Many factors can affect social mobility and career achievement, such as personal attributes, family background, demographics, economic growth, the education system, labor market structure and other public policies. Slow economic growth after the global financial crisis clearly affected employment, incomes and social mobility in the short run. Stable economic growth is the most important external factor in improving social mobility. Recent studies have also found that a higher education level and a wealthier family background are associated with the likelihood of being in the middle class.

          In the HKPSEA study, over half of the respondents felt that the most significant obstacle to their social mobility was a lack of educational qualifications. Only about a third of the respondents blamed the economic situation or government policies, and only 17 percent attributed their lack of mobility to their less fortunate family background. About two thirds of these post-80s respondents agreed that pursing post-secondary education can increase social mobility, and 77 percent agreed with the statement that "personal hard work and other non-family factors are more important than family background". Over two thirds of the youngsters still regarded Hong Kong as a fair place with plenty of mobility opportunities. They indicated a willingness to pursue further education to raise their academic qualifications and enhance their career prospects. Such a positive attitude is somewhat different from what is sometimes reported in the media.

          Fair or equal educational opportunities can be seen as the minimum assurance for greater social mobility. Although educational equality may not necessarily lead to social equality, educational inequality can deepen social inequality. Therefore, we need to ensure maximum education equality, especially for lower-income families.

          In terms of educational equality, the minimum the government can do is to ensure educational resources are invested fairly. Unfortunately, the quotas of UGC-funded first-degree places has been frozen at 14,500 since 1994 (only 18 percent of the age-group versus the world average of 26 percent), and this is far from being able to satisfy the need of some 26,000 applicants who meet the minimum university entrance requirements (with another 24,000 students who did not meet this requirement).

          Most students who are not admitted to UGC-funded first-degree programs are forced to enter high-cost self-financed sub-degree (or some first-degree) programs) with little or no government subsidies (except loans). This creates a heavy financial burden for many lower-income families. Furthermore, only a small percentage of those associate degree graduates can ultimately be admitted to a funded top-up degree programme.

          In fact, only 26 percent of Hong Kong's workforce has tertiary qualifications, and this has put Hong Kong far behind the majority of developed economies. To ensure more equal opportunities for post-secondary education and to sustain Hong Kong's international competitiveness, many Hong Kong people have urged the government to increase funding substantially and urgently to allow more young people to pursue funded first-degree studies.

          The author is a senior university professor and administrator.

          (HK Edition 12/29/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产稚嫩高中生呻吟激情在线视频| 男人扒女人添高潮视频| 国模雨珍浓密毛大尺度150p| 小嫩批日出水无码视频免费| 呻吟国产av久久一区二区| 九九九久久国产精品| 国产在线无码精品无码| 久久精品国产亚洲av天海翼| 男女性高爱潮免费网站| 国产精品黄色精品黄色大片| 中文字幕精品亚洲二区| 麻豆精品国产熟妇aⅴ一区| 纯肉高h啪动漫| 国产精品免费视频网站| 国产网红无码福利在线播放| 亚洲成aⅴ人在线电影| 亚洲欧美综合中文| 在线看免费无码av天堂| 国产不卡精品视频男人的天堂| 国产午夜福利小视频在线| 八个少妇沟厕小便漂亮各种大屁股| 成人免费视频一区二区三区| aaa少妇高潮大片免费看| 在线人成免费视频69国产| 精品日韩精品国产另类专区| 99国产亚洲精品美女久久久久| 成人免费无码大片a毛片| 国产成人亚洲综合图区| 免费无码VA一区二区三区| 5D肉蒲团之性战奶水欧美| 国产高潮视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线视在亚洲| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费乳及| 亚洲欧美一区二区成人片| 久9re热视频这里只有精品免费| 成人性无码专区免费视频| 在线视频一区二区三区色| 亚洲二区中文字幕在线| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产 另类 在线 欧美日韩|