<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          Updated: 2017-06-13 07:05

          By Joseph Li in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Former chief secretary for administration Henry Tang Ying-yen believes Hong Kong people, including the legal profession, must accept that the country's top legislature has the lawful authority to exercise interpretations of the Basic Law, and that there was a need to interpret the Basic Law on each occasion.

          Since the handover in 1997, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has interpreted provisions of the Basic Law on five occasions.

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          "The Basic Law has clearly spelt out that the NPCSC has the power to interpret the Basic Law and the NPCSC will not exercise an interpretation without reasons," he said.

          "We have seen five interpretations of Basic Law provisions since 1997 and each interpretation was justified. They include interpretations related to the right of abode case in 1999, the term of office of the Chief Executive in 2005 and the Congo case in 2011 because it involved foreign affairs," he explained.

          In a recent newspaper interview Andrew Li Kwok-nang, former chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal, said the latest interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 related to oaths and disqualification of certain Legislative Council members last year yielded a negative public impression on judicial independence in Hong Kong. This is because it occurred before the court ruling.

          Tang disagreed but said he understood why the former chief justice made such comments.

          He said: "For the case of LegCo oath fiasco, the timing of interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 before the ruling was appropriate. If the interpretation took place after the ruling and the ruling happened to be inconsistent with the interpretation, people would grumble that the interpretation in effect overturned the court verdict."

          Tang, however, admitted the interpretation on the right-of-abode case in 1999 was highly controversial because it was the very first time the NPCSC interpreted Basic Law provisions. It happened after the Court of Final Appeal had handed down a ruling.

          joseph@chinadailyhk.com

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          (HK Edition 06/13/2017 page4)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 色欲天天天综合网| 性色av无码无在线观看| 最新精品国偷自产在线| av午夜福利一片看久久| 国产伦一区二区三区精品| 亚洲国产成人综合精品| 国产精品日日摸夜夜添夜夜添无码| 在国产线视频A在线视频| av资源在线看免费观看| 免费人妻无码不卡中文18禁| 午夜精品影视国产一区在线麻豆| 天堂网av最新在线| 无码人妻天天拍夜夜爽| 日韩中文字幕亚洲精品一| 中文字幕国产精品二区| 强奷乱码中文字幕| 日99久9在线 | 免费| 国产精品乱码高清在线观看| 成人精品视频一区二区三区| 1精品啪国产在线观看免费牛牛| 白嫩人妻精品一二三四区| 国产对白老熟女正在播放| 无码熟妇人妻AV影音先锋| 老司机性色福利精品视频| 国产av巨作丝袜秘书| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色在| 无码免费大香伊蕉在人线国产| 亚洲性色AV一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇在线视频观看| 亚洲精品av无码喷奶水网站| 亚洲老熟女一区二区三区| 日韩精品不卡一区二区三区| 美女自卫慰黄网站| 色狠狠综合天天综合综合| 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲九九| 五月天在线视频观看| 国产成人精品久久性色av| 亚洲乱理伦片在线观看中字| 国产美女午夜福利视频| 亚洲大尺度视频在线播放|