<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          Updated: 2017-06-13 07:05

          By Joseph Li in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Former chief secretary for administration Henry Tang Ying-yen believes Hong Kong people, including the legal profession, must accept that the country's top legislature has the lawful authority to exercise interpretations of the Basic Law, and that there was a need to interpret the Basic Law on each occasion.

          Since the handover in 1997, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has interpreted provisions of the Basic Law on five occasions.

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          "The Basic Law has clearly spelt out that the NPCSC has the power to interpret the Basic Law and the NPCSC will not exercise an interpretation without reasons," he said.

          "We have seen five interpretations of Basic Law provisions since 1997 and each interpretation was justified. They include interpretations related to the right of abode case in 1999, the term of office of the Chief Executive in 2005 and the Congo case in 2011 because it involved foreign affairs," he explained.

          In a recent newspaper interview Andrew Li Kwok-nang, former chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal, said the latest interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 related to oaths and disqualification of certain Legislative Council members last year yielded a negative public impression on judicial independence in Hong Kong. This is because it occurred before the court ruling.

          Tang disagreed but said he understood why the former chief justice made such comments.

          He said: "For the case of LegCo oath fiasco, the timing of interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 before the ruling was appropriate. If the interpretation took place after the ruling and the ruling happened to be inconsistent with the interpretation, people would grumble that the interpretation in effect overturned the court verdict."

          Tang, however, admitted the interpretation on the right-of-abode case in 1999 was highly controversial because it was the very first time the NPCSC interpreted Basic Law provisions. It happened after the Court of Final Appeal had handed down a ruling.

          joseph@chinadailyhk.com

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          (HK Edition 06/13/2017 page4)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 最新国产精品拍自在线观看| 亚洲国产精品日韩专区av| 国产AV大陆精品一区二区三区| 成午夜福利人试看120秒| 亚洲高清揄拍自拍| 国产精品中文字幕久久| 性无码专区一色吊丝中文字幕| 乱人伦中文字幕成人网站在线| 国产精品啪| 夜夜添无码一区二区三区| 国产在线观看免费人成视频| 久久国产综合精品swag蓝导航| 国产日韩av二区三区| 国产成人国产在线观看| 亚洲人妻精品中文字幕| 国产激情电影综合在线看| 人妻少妇偷人精品免费看| 免费观看日本污污ww网站69| 国产精品男女午夜福利片| 亚洲精品国偷拍自产在线观看蜜臀 | 亚洲成av人在线播放无码| 国产精品国产自产拍高清| 灭火宝贝高清完整版在线观看| 国产精品一区二区不卡视频| 国内精品久久久久影院薰衣草| 精品日韩色国产在线观看| 欧美成人精品三级网站| 亚洲AV成人片在线观看| 国产精品久久久久孕妇| 伊人欧美在线| 国产精一品亚洲二区在线播放| 国产无套无码AⅤ在线观看| 强开少妇嫩苞又嫩又紧九色| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久 | 免费爆乳精品一区二区| 日本久久一区二区三区高清| 国产精品大全中文字幕| 就去色综合| 亚洲精品专区永久免费区| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩不卡 | 亚洲男人成人性天堂网站|