<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          China
          Home / China / View

          Democracy or humility? Why not both?

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-01-28 08:25

          Recent shock polling results have opened the world's eyes to the fact that no form of government is totally flawless

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime prime minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, it is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development. But now, it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          A widespread sentiment within Western electorates, that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites, is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the US and Britain and may play a role in future outcomes of 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in Britain and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system - the people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and a recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures have taken a different road.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. To contact the writer at harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Editor's picks
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品久久黄色片看看| 五月丁香六月综合缴清无码| 蕾丝av无码专区在线观看| 少妇人妻在线视频| 天天爽天天摸天天碰| 中文字幕日韩有码国产| 婷婷六月色| 福利片91| 绯色蜜臀av一区二区不卡| 噜噜久久噜噜久久鬼88| 日本极品少妇videossexhd| 亚洲综合区图片小说区| 日韩精品一区二区亚洲专区| 无码视频伊人| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产 亚洲 网友自拍| 亚洲区精品区日韩区综合区| 亚洲中文字幕人妻系列| 日本边吃奶边摸边做在线视频| 91精品少妇一区二区三区蜜桃臀| 国产精品午夜福利小视频| 国产稚嫩高中生呻吟激情在线视频| 337P日本欧洲亚洲大胆在线| 国产成人午夜在线视频极速观看| 午夜在线观看成人av| 女人喷水高潮时的视频网站| 尤物久久国产精品免费| 国产精品白丝一区二区三区| 同性男男黄gay片免费| 中文字幕欧美成人免费| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久中文字幕| 东京热大乱系列无码| 亚洲欧美国产日韩天堂区| 五月天天天综合精品无码| 人妻美女免费在线视频| 亚洲综合久久国产一区二区| 国产特级毛片aaaaaa毛片| 神马影院伦理我不卡| 一区二区三区四区高清自拍| 亚洲人成电影在线天堂色| 欧洲亚洲国产成人综合色婷婷|