<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Op-Ed Contributors

          Passing the buck for pollution

          By Zhang Monan (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-04-11 08:03
          Large Medium Small

          Developed countries should shoulder their own responsibilities instead of imposing a carbon tax on developing economies

          Developing countries should take active measures to head off the impact of developed countries' intensified attempts to shift the cost of their historical carbon emissions to developing countries.

          In a move designed to make developing nations pay the price for the treatment of their own carbon dioxide emissions, the Unites States, Japan and European nations have proposed a carbon tax on commodities coming into their territories.

          On Nov 19, 2008, the European Parliament and the European Commission adopted a bill, including international airlines into the EU Emissions Trading Scheme System (EU ETS) and announced that the bill would take effect on Jan 1, 2012. According to an estimate made by the International Air Transport Association, the European bill, if put in place, will result in an additional 2.4 billion-euro ($3.46 billion) cost for global airlines.

          Under the new system China would have to pay about 740 million yuan ($113 million).

          This carbon tax is a new form of economic hegemony. The costs and benefits brought by global carbon emissions have long been unevenly distributed between developed and developing nations.

          It is extremely unfair to use developed countries' carbon emission standards to measure the volumes of carbon emissions in developing nations and it ignores the large-volume of carbon emissions produced by the highly industrialized countries during their development.

          Statistics show that developed nations are responsible for 80 percent of global carbon emissions since 1950. After enjoying a high-polluting and high-energy consumption stage, developed countries are now in a cleaner and less-polluting post-industrialized stage. In comparison, emerging nations such as China, Russia and India are still in the early or middle stage of their industrialization and still rely on heavy industries for their economic growth.

          The formation of a global structure of labor division that favors developed nations has accelerated the transfer of global low-end industries, especially the high-polluting and high-emissions manufacturing sector, to developing nations and has enabled developed countries to shift some of their carbon emissions to developing countries. Statistics indicate that as a result of this shift, as much as 1.2 billion tons of carbon emissions are passed on to China every year, 20 percent of the its total volume of carbon emissions.

          By imposing carbon taxes on inflowing commodities, developed countries have their own ulterior motives. Because of their light industry-dominant industrial structure, developed countries have a lower carbon emission intensity than their developing counterparts.

          The carbon tax, which is in essence a new-type of trade barrier, will protect their own homegrown enterprises and raise the export costs for developing countries, compromising their competitiveness.

          A carbon tax, if adopted globally, would have a huge effect on China, a fast-growing economy that is fuelled by coal and oil consumption. Currently, China's energy consumption for every unit of its gross domestic product (GDP) is more than twice the world average. Therefore, a carbon tax would directly raise the costs for China's manufacturing sectors, reduce their profit margins and weaken their competitiveness in the international market.

          A survey conducted by the World Resources Institute (WRI) shows that China's exported commodities have the highest level of carbon emissions among world countries. That means that China's exports will bear the brunt of any carbon tax. A World Bank report indicates that the implementation of a carbon tax in the international market would mean an additional 26-percent on "made-in-China" goods and that exports would decline by 21 percent.

          To uphold their right to development China must work with other developing nations to ensure the accumulated carbon emission volumes, per capita GDP and per capita disposable incomes are the standards for the distribution of global carbon emission volumes. At the same time, developed countries should set up a compensation mechanism for carbon emission reductions in developing countries to protect the latter's fledging industries and their trade interests.

          China should also accelerate its long-overdue economic and industrial restructuring and develop low-carbon industries.

          The author is an economics researcher with the State Information Center.

          分享按鈕
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 少妇又爽又刺激视频| 天堂av网一区二区三区| 亚欧洲乱码视频在线专区| 中文字幕av中文字无码亚| 久热这里只有精品蜜臀av| 2021国产精品视频网站| 中文有无人妻vs无码人妻激烈| 老司机午夜精品视频资源| 久久久久久久久久久免费精品| 呻吟国产av久久一区二区| 国产99在线 | 免费| 亚洲综合无码一区二区痴汉| 麻豆国产成人av在线播放欲色 | 国产精品熟女亚洲av麻豆| 精品久久免费国产乱色也| 性欧美VIDEOFREE高清大喷水 | www射我里面在线观看| 全午夜免费一级毛片| 亚洲国产精品综合福利专区| 久久频这里精品99香蕉久网址| 久久精品熟女亚洲av艳妇| 日本久久一区二区三区高清| 人妻中文字幕亚洲精品| 国产成熟妇女性视频电影| 中文字幕有码免费视频| 无码国内精品人妻少妇| 国产女精品视频网站免费蜜芽| 99久久精品久久久| 国产精品午夜福利在线观看| 国产精品精品一区二区三| 国内精品人妻一区二区三区 | 韩国无码AV片午夜福利| 中文字幕有码无码AV| 图片区偷拍区小说区五月| 日本一卡2卡3卡4卡无卡免费| 无码专区aaaaaa免费视频| 亚洲av成人一区国产精品| 97色成人综合网站| 国产精品视频中文字幕| 国产重口老太和小伙| 国产首页一区二区不卡|