<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Domestic Affairs

          Don't blacklist, demand good reporting

          By Kim Bowden (chinadaily.com.cn)
          Updated: 2011-06-29 10:17
          Large Medium Small

          Exploding watermelons, phony eggs, rice made from plastic bags...Navigating supermarket aisles is risky business if you believe everything you read.

          China's Health Ministry has appointed itself supermarket security guard, announcing earlier this month its plan to blacklist journalists who mislead the public with phony-food stories.

          Over the passed three weeks the China Daily has encouraged online debate on the issue and as a young Western journalist I have been reading the comments with interest.

          A whopping 74 percent of respondents said they thought it was unreasonable for the Ministry to limit the freedom of the press to report on food-safety scandals. And thank goodness for that.

          With journalists often ranking alongside lawyers, politicians and used-car salesmen in the pits of public esteem, it was humbling to know these respondents, at least, thought we had a vital public service role to play.

          Amidst a seemingly never-ending series of stomach-turning and downright bizarre food-safety claims, consumers are desperate for information.

          "Basically, people now feel nothing is safe to eat," Sang Liwei, who directs the Beijing office of the Global Food Safety Forum, a private agency, told a New York Times reporter. "They don't know what choices to make. They are really feeling very helpless."

          Perhaps I am idealistic, journalism-school teachings are still fresh in my mind having graduated just last year, but I believe good journalism empowers people to make informed choices and holds the powers that be to account.

          It worries me that China's Health Ministry would try to curb this watch-dog role of the press in any way.

          But with this role comes responsibilities.

          As another China Daily contributor put it last week: "Newspapers and reporters are supposed to have a different set of values when it comes to the truth, the idea being that we supply critical thinking and verify the facts so readers can believe what is being said."

          In an increasingly commercial news culture, where better to be first and wrong rather than last and right is a common newsroom mantra and too many journalists fail to stray far from the press release turnaround treadmill, good investigative reporting often falls by the wayside.

          Science and consumer affairs reporting are especially difficult in this climate, and years of research and complex findings are often condensed into just a few simple paragraphs and a catchy headline.

          Misinformation can cause public panic and ruin an industry's credibility, and it is right for the Ministry, along with food producers and consumers, to demand nothing less than the highest of journalistic standards from reporters.

          It wouldn't be the first time the media has got it horribly wrong.

          Skewed reporting of a suggested link between autism and the MMR vaccine, a shot against measles, mumps and rubella, led to wide-spread public panic regarding the safety of the vaccine in many Western countries.

          Immunization rates plummeted and an illness "that had pretty much been consigned to the dustbin of diseases", as a UK Guardian columnist put it, has returned once more.

          In 1998 Dr Andrew Wakefield published a study suggesting a link between the MMR jab and autism and "numerous newspapers and magazines championed him as a brave voice of reason and chastised the government for trying to silence his findings". The columnist goes on to say that "even as Dr Wakefield's claims were roundly discredited by experts, journalists continued to back him".

          Sensationalist news sells papers, it generates page views, but it is certainly not the job of the media to scare readers senseless, especially without the fact checking to warrant it.

          When it comes to reporting food safety scandals, reporters and their media outlets must strive for more than a "he said, she said" type of story. They must independently verify facts and not give unwarranted voice to crackpot science or conspiracy theories.

          When such journalistic standards are adhered to, any attempts by the Health Ministry to blacklist journalists would, in my opinion, be heavy handed and an alarming step on a slippery slope of thwarting press freedom.

          Kim Bowden hails from Auckland, New Zealand, where she recently completed AUT University’s Postgraduate Journalism Diploma, top of her class.

          分享按鈕
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 天堂www在线中文| 亚洲国产精品成人av网| 亚洲精品日本久久久中文字幕| 国精品91人妻无码一区二区三区| 欧美精品1卡二卡三卡四卡| 亚洲国产成人AⅤ片在线观看| 免费看婬乱a欧美大片| 国产成人一区二区三区视频在线 | 乱妇乱女熟妇熟女网站| 色综合 图片区 小说区| 极品vpswindows少妇| 国产精品老年自拍视频| 一本色道国产在线观看二区 | 夜夜躁日日躁狠狠久久av| 99www久久综合久久爱com| 色偷偷中文在线天堂中文| 91精品免费久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av久| 日韩av在线一卡二卡三卡 | 天堂网亚洲综合在线| 亚洲天堂男人的天堂在线| 狠狠色狠狠色综合久久蜜芽| 亚州AV无码乱码精品国产| 视频一区二区无码制服师生 | 国内不卡的一区二区三区| 国产内射性高湖| 激动网视频| 少妇粗大进出白浆嘿嘿视频| 2020国产欧洲精品网站| 国产自产视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧洲日产国码久在线| 亚洲日本韩国欧美云霸高清| 日本一道一区二区视频| 4hu44四虎www在线影院麻豆| 久久精品99无色码中文字幕| AV无码免费不卡在线观看| 亚洲第一视频区| 精品久久综合日本久久网| 久久综合开心激情五月天| 日韩精品一区二区三区人| 久久一区二区中文字幕|