<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / From the Press

          Western countries lose more than credibility by rejecting China as market economy

          By Mei Xinyu | Xinhua | Updated: 2016-12-09 11:01

          Should the US, Europe and Japan recognize China as a country of market economy?

          There is a simple and clear answer to this question. In Article 15 of the Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China to the WTO, subparagraph (a) and subparagraph (b) make it clear that “in any event, the provisions of subparagraph (a) (ii) shall expire 15 years after the date of accession.”

          In other words, after 15 years have passed since China’s accession to the WTO, which will occur on Dec. 11, 2016, other parties should accept the price and cost of Chinese industries under investigation instead of using the Surrogate Country System when it comes to anti-dumping or counter vailing cases against China. This means that WTO members should recognize China as a market economy. With their signatures on the Protocol, the US, Europe and Japan should fulfill their promise to the international community.

          The excuses raised by these countries to deny China’s status as a market economy are self-contradictory. For example, the US referred to the legal basis of the Tariff Act of 1930, including “the extent to which the currency of the foreign country is convertible into the currency of other countries; the extent to which wage rates in the foreign country are determined by free bargaining between labor and management; the extent to which joint ventures or other investments by firms of other foreign countries are permitted in the foreign country; the extent of government ownership or control of the means of production; the extent of government control over the allocation of resources and over the price and output decisions of enterprises.”

          However, it only takes basic knowledge of the current economic situation in China to see how ridiculous these regulations are. Take the convertibility of RMB as an example. China first achieved RMB convertibility in 1996, and loosened the regulations on capital account convertibility in recent years. Otherwise, China wouldn’t achieve trillions of USD in imports annually (last year the number was nearly $1.7 trillion) or hundreds of millions of outbound tourism trips each year and increasing FDI, nor would China make more and more countries include the RMB in their foreign exchange reserves.

          As for government regulation, Uncle Sam should first reflect on himself before pointing fingers at China. Keeping the appearance of “rule of law” and “supervision,” the public sectors of the US have intervened too much in the economic lives of citizens. During the eight-year governance of the Obama administration, over 27,000 laws and regulations have been passed, and each one dragged on. One healthcare bill contained over 2,700 pages, and none of the judges or lawmakers who passed the bill had read it thoroughly. Because of overregulation in the US, it takes a lemonade stand 65 days to pass the approval process and five weeks to get a food safety license.

          It only requires faith and honesty to recognize China as a market economy, but some protectionists cannot keep their word, instead focusing on their own interests. Eventually, this will cost them. Since China has become a major import market and its economic growth rate ranks first among major economies, it is important to hold on to the Chinese market. The situations in Japan and South Korea serve as a case in point: though Japan used to be the biggest source of imports to China for almost three decades, far ahead of South Korea, the latter surpassed Japan in 2013 with a per capita GDP soaring from $11,948 to $25,977 between 2000 and 2013. At the same time, Japan’s per capita GDP only increased from $37,292 to $38,634.

          What’s more, by denying China’s due economic status, Western countries will lose their credibility when it comes to trade and political negotiations. If they can treat so lightly their commitments to China, the second largest economy and the second biggest power in the world, then their commitments to other countries will truly mean nothing. Though this may not happen soon, the influence will last a long time after it takes effect.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产成人午夜福利| 日本美女性亚洲精品黄色| 精品亚洲国产成人av制服| 性xxxxfreexxxxx牲性| 国产不卡一区二区四区| 美腿丝袜亚洲综合在线视频| 国产乱子伦农村xxxx| 亚洲国产日韩在线成人蜜芽| 高清日韩一区二区三区视频| 国产欧美精品一区aⅴ影院| 国产精品国产精品偷麻豆| 国产无套护士在线观看| 色欲国产一区二区日韩欧美| 国产不卡一区二区在线| 蜜桃亚洲一区二区三区四| 日韩一区二区三在线观看| 日本高清在线播放一区二区三区| 日韩狼人精品在线观看| 人妻丝袜中文无码av影音先锋| 久久综合噜噜激激的五月天| 亚洲美免无码中文字幕在线| 日韩 一区二区在线观看| 黄色不卡视频一区二区三区| 国产精品福利自产拍久久| 亚洲综合中文字幕国产精品欧美| 国产一区二区在线有码| blued视频免费观看片| 亚洲伊人精品久视频国产| 六十路老熟妇乱子伦视频 | 国产精品露脸视频观看| 亚洲a∨国产av综合av| 欧美日韩国产草草影院| 人妻夜夜爽天天爽三区麻豆av| 无卡无码无免费毛片| 四虎成人高清永久免费看| 久久精品国产再热青青青| 99国产精品自在自在久久| 成人国产亚洲精品一区二| 亚洲国产精品高清久久久| 99在线精品视频观看免费| 日韩精品永久免费播放平台|