<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          By Berlin Fang | China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-31 07:24

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          Students from the Qiang ethnic group study the regional textbook in Sichuan province.[Photo/China Daily]

          The People's Education Press has announced that it will remove the "fake text" about Thomas Edison (1847-1931) from textbooks since the next semester from September.

          According to that text, Edison, as a child, used mirrors to direct light to the operation table during his mother's appendicitis surgery. Though the story highlights the earlier creativity of Edison, the first appendicitis surgery was performed in 1886, when Edison was 39 years old.

          Some people said some Chinese textbooks have similar factual errors. For instance, one text describes a father rushing to a school to save students after the 1994 earthquake rocked California. Yet a simple fact check shows the 1994 earthquake occurred at 4:30 am when most of the students were in bed. All such texts sound like the story of George Washington cutting the cherry tree, teaching good moral lessons with fake stories, which eventually lead to credibility problems. And after suspecting readers debunk such stories, editors should either correct the mistakes or remove the contents from textbooks.

          But a few authorities argue that these are not history textbooks, but books to teach Chinese language and literature to students. As such, they allow room for fictional "embellishments". Such arguments are indefensible, as Edison is a historical figure and biographical materials should be faithful to facts. Authors or editors cannot just make up content with factual loopholes.

          It causes a great uproar every time there is an issue with Chinese textbooks, for instance, when someone detects a problem, or when editors remove a historically revered author's article. One wonders why such debates don't stay in the smaller circles of Chinese teachers and textbook compilers. The main reason is that the teaching of language and literature revolves excessively around the use of a few textbooks students are assigned, even when there are more and better reading materials out there.

          In urban areas with ample number of bookstores and libraries, students have access to other books they can read, which could mitigate the problems caused by these "fake texts". But in rural and less-developed areas, students don't have facilities or resources to borrow or buy additional books. Their textbooks become the only books they read, hence their importance and the public attention on them.

          I have also noticed that none of the textbook controversies in the past decade was identified by a student suspecting an error. It is worrisome that the majority of students just accept whatever they get.

          Heavy dependence on textbooks in China might cause "intellectual malnutrition" among students. It's true that editors carefully select these textbooks, but students should also be taught to find additional reading materials to enrich themselves. Educators and families should not put all their developmental eggs in one textbook basket for students. While publishers should address the problems with textbooks, I have higher hope that teachers and parents would scaffold students' ability to choose additional sources to read. I also plead for more reading, as a thin textbook doesn't offer much for the developmental needs at any grade level.

          To widen students' scope of reading, the Chinese government ought to build libraries in less-developed areas. With ubiquitous technology and mobile phone access, Chinese educators should also think of innovative solutions to help students overcome the problems with accessing high-quality reading materials.

          Mobile reading is becoming increasingly available for the average Chinese reader, and plenty of reading materials have already been digitized. The scarcity of content or platforms should no longer be a problem. What follows then is the development of teachers' ability to help students screen and select a vast array of reading materials.

          Besides, increased need for reading should be an opportunity for textbook publishers, too, as they can offer more products to teachers and parents to choose from.

          Berlin Fang is an instructional designer, literary translator and columnist writing on cross-cultural issues.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊人色综合一区二区三区影院视频 | 国产成人精品成人a在线观看| 性欧洲大肥性欧洲大肥女| 国产成人av在线影院无毒| 日韩国产精品区一区二区| 国产中文字幕在线一区| 亚洲av成人网人人蜜臀| 日韩人妻少妇一区二区三区| 亚洲婷婷综合色高清在线| 久久久WWW成人免费精品| 国产人妖av一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 国产成人无码一区二区三区在线| 免费一区二三区三区蜜桃| 最新亚洲人成网站在线观看| 四虎成人精品在永久在线| 日本欧美大码a在线观看| av偷拍亚洲一区二区三区 | 超级乱淫片午夜电影网福利| 亚洲综合一区国产精品| 99国产精品自在自在久久| 国产精品午夜福利视频| av网站免费线看| 欧洲国产成人久久精品综合| 一区二区三区国产好的精华液| 国产精品自拍视频免费看| 亚洲av永久无码精品秋霞电影影院| 亚洲成a人片在线观看中| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码久久99| 亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区| 亚洲av在线观看| 在线视频不卡在线亚洲| 久久久久久伊人高潮影院| 久久综合九色欧美婷婷| 国产福利在线观看免费第一福利| 又黄又爽又高潮免费毛片| 国产精品高清中文字幕| 99久久久无码国产精品9| 国产精品成人中文字幕| 国产精品一品二区三区的使用体验| jizz视频在线观看|