<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          By Berlin Fang | China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-31 07:24

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          Students from the Qiang ethnic group study the regional textbook in Sichuan province.[Photo/China Daily]

          The People's Education Press has announced that it will remove the "fake text" about Thomas Edison (1847-1931) from textbooks since the next semester from September.

          According to that text, Edison, as a child, used mirrors to direct light to the operation table during his mother's appendicitis surgery. Though the story highlights the earlier creativity of Edison, the first appendicitis surgery was performed in 1886, when Edison was 39 years old.

          Some people said some Chinese textbooks have similar factual errors. For instance, one text describes a father rushing to a school to save students after the 1994 earthquake rocked California. Yet a simple fact check shows the 1994 earthquake occurred at 4:30 am when most of the students were in bed. All such texts sound like the story of George Washington cutting the cherry tree, teaching good moral lessons with fake stories, which eventually lead to credibility problems. And after suspecting readers debunk such stories, editors should either correct the mistakes or remove the contents from textbooks.

          But a few authorities argue that these are not history textbooks, but books to teach Chinese language and literature to students. As such, they allow room for fictional "embellishments". Such arguments are indefensible, as Edison is a historical figure and biographical materials should be faithful to facts. Authors or editors cannot just make up content with factual loopholes.

          It causes a great uproar every time there is an issue with Chinese textbooks, for instance, when someone detects a problem, or when editors remove a historically revered author's article. One wonders why such debates don't stay in the smaller circles of Chinese teachers and textbook compilers. The main reason is that the teaching of language and literature revolves excessively around the use of a few textbooks students are assigned, even when there are more and better reading materials out there.

          In urban areas with ample number of bookstores and libraries, students have access to other books they can read, which could mitigate the problems caused by these "fake texts". But in rural and less-developed areas, students don't have facilities or resources to borrow or buy additional books. Their textbooks become the only books they read, hence their importance and the public attention on them.

          I have also noticed that none of the textbook controversies in the past decade was identified by a student suspecting an error. It is worrisome that the majority of students just accept whatever they get.

          Heavy dependence on textbooks in China might cause "intellectual malnutrition" among students. It's true that editors carefully select these textbooks, but students should also be taught to find additional reading materials to enrich themselves. Educators and families should not put all their developmental eggs in one textbook basket for students. While publishers should address the problems with textbooks, I have higher hope that teachers and parents would scaffold students' ability to choose additional sources to read. I also plead for more reading, as a thin textbook doesn't offer much for the developmental needs at any grade level.

          To widen students' scope of reading, the Chinese government ought to build libraries in less-developed areas. With ubiquitous technology and mobile phone access, Chinese educators should also think of innovative solutions to help students overcome the problems with accessing high-quality reading materials.

          Mobile reading is becoming increasingly available for the average Chinese reader, and plenty of reading materials have already been digitized. The scarcity of content or platforms should no longer be a problem. What follows then is the development of teachers' ability to help students screen and select a vast array of reading materials.

          Besides, increased need for reading should be an opportunity for textbook publishers, too, as they can offer more products to teachers and parents to choose from.

          Berlin Fang is an instructional designer, literary translator and columnist writing on cross-cultural issues.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一区二区三区黄色片| 久久三级中文欧大战字幕| 一级国产在线观看高清| 一本久道中文无码字幕av| 99热这里只有成人精品国产 | 黑人异族巨大巨大巨粗| 中文字幕乱码中文乱码毛片| 四虎永久精品在线视频| 99久久无色码中文字幕鲁信| 国内自拍视频一区二区三区| 婷婷99视频精品全部在线观看| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲| 午夜三级成人在线观看| 国产成人资源| 亚洲精品国产免费av| 久久一二三四区中文字幕| 午夜福利片一区二区三区| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020老熟妇| av无码一区二区大桥久未| 在线观看亚洲精品国产| 亚洲丰满熟女一区二区v| 日本大片免A费观看视频三区| 久久国产精品成人免费古装| 精品人妻中文字幕av| 精品国产sm最大网站| 深夜宅男福利免费在线观看| 国产女人在线视频| 欧美18videosex性欧美tube1080| 少妇人妻偷人免费观看| 国产日韩一区二区天美麻豆| 国产亚洲精品福利片| 成人一区二区三区视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡| 日本欧美一区二区三区在线播放| 91在线国内在线播放老师 | 蜜臀av一区二区国产精品| 少妇人妻偷人精品视蜜桃 | 精品一区二区亚洲国产| 亚洲av日韩在线资源| 日本熟妇人妻中出| av中文字幕在线二区|