<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-10 08:34

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          Milan Bacevic, Serbian ambassador to China, experiences TCM diagnosis at "TCM Health Day For Ambassadors" in Beijing, Dec 12, 2016. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

          A diplomat, as once defined by US writer Caskie Stinnett, "is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip". Stinnett was writing in the mid-20th century, when exchanges between governments still relied on cadres of professionals based in each other's capitals and communicating with home via telegram, or dispatches hand-carried by couriers and consigned to diplomatic bags.

          His definition of the diplomat's role encapsulates its essential requirements-sycophancy and duplicity.

          These days, world leaders can communicate instantly with both their constituents and each other with no more effort-and frequently no more thought-than it takes to type 140 characters on their Twitter feed.

          US President Donald Trump is a master of the new art and appears to follow a rule adopted from his business career that, even in diplomacy, you should aim to cut out the middleman. But the problem with instant messaging is that it offers speed at the cost of reflection, and brevity at the cost of precision. It also dispenses with that essential diplomatic tool-procrastination.

          The diplomat of a previous era, called on to defuse some looming crisis engendered by an intemperate remark or gesture from one of his or her political masters, would invariably assure the host government that the embassy was "urgently seeking clarification". (Translation: "We're going to delay and obfuscate until you've forgotten all about it.")

          These days, by contrast, social media gives political leaders a virtual "hot line" to abuse each other directly and very publicly without recourse to diplomatic intermediaries. Many may welcome the more direct approach spearheaded by Trump as a breath of fresh air. Like a man who has fired the White House chauffeur and grabbed the steering wheel himself, Trump careers along the information superhighway, shoving aside enemies both foreign and domestic. It must be invigorating, as long as you don't crash.

          You might also argue that the direct approach to diplomacy is more honest.

          In the past, the blazing confrontation between the United States and Germany over the future of the Western alliance would have been described in diplomat-speak as "full and frank exchanges". With social media at his disposal, Trump can cut through the hypocrisy by tweeting: "We have a massive trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay far less than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for US. This will change".

          But despite the superficial attractions of this "tell it like it is" approach, there is still much to be said for old-style diplomacy. The niceties of diplomatic protocol can help to defuse tensions, rather than enflame them.

          In its guide Protocol for the Modern Diplomat, the US State Department cautions new recruits that the informal US approach does not always go down well with other cultures. According to the guide: "Tremendous differences exist in how close people stand to socialize, how loudly they speak, and how much eye contact they maintain." And, it might have added, don't push fellow heads of state aside to get to the front of the line.

          For all the stuffiness and insincerity of the diplomatic circuit, traditional diplomats probably do continue to play an essential role, even in an era of instant communications and presidential tweeting.

          Diplomats alone cannot prevent conflicts, as history shows. But a temperate diplomatic approach can help calm the waters. "A soft answer turns away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger", as it says in the Christian Bible.

          The essence of the profession is not, of course, to be gratuitously generous to the other side, but rather to gain advantage for one's own, if necessary by lying for one's country.

          In the words of the great Chinese strategist Sun Tzu: "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."

          The author is a senior media consultant for China Daily, Europe.

          editor@mail.chinadailyuk.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 综合久久av一区二区三区| 妺妺窝人体色www聚色窝仙踪| 又长又粗又爽又高潮的视频| 国产激情婷婷丁香五月天| 少妇人妻偷人一区二区| 少妇尿尿一区二区在线免费| 坐盗市亚洲综合一二三区| 欧洲精品色在线观看| 亚洲少妇人妻无码视频| 国产成人午夜福利在线小电影| 成人啪精品视频网站午夜| 国产影片AV级毛片特别刺激| 国产高清看片日韩欧美久久| 久久亚洲国产精品久久| 浮力影院欧美三级日本三级| 99精品久久免费精品久久| 999福利激情视频| 天天摸夜夜摸夜夜狠狠添| 噜噜久久噜噜久久鬼88| 成人午夜免费无码视频在线观看 | 无人去码一码二码三码区| 中文日产幕无线码一区中文| 国产精品一区中文字幕| 九九热在线视频观看这里只有精品| 光棍天堂在线手机播放免费| 亚洲第一福利网站在线| 久久频这里精品99香蕉久网址| 国产毛1卡2卡3卡4卡免费观看| 性激烈的欧美三级视频| 国产精品一区在线蜜臀| 国产不卡在线一区二区| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 日本在线观看视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av无码成人精品区一区| 亚洲人成色7777在线观看| 亚洲精品专区永久免费区| 久久综合色一综合色88欧美| 国产麻豆精品一区一区三区| 曰韩无码二三区中文字幕| 麻豆天美东精91厂制片| 美女黄网站人色视频免费国产|