<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Think twice about imposing property tax

          By Yang Zhiyong | China Daily | Updated: 2017-11-29 08:30

          Huang Qifan, vice-chairman of the economic and finance committee of the National People's Congress, the country's top legislature, said at a recent forum that the imposition of residential property tax is imperative, listing four major advantages of the move. Before that, in November 2013, the Third Plenum of the 18th Communist Party of China Central Committee had said legislation on real estate tax will be accelerated, and the tax reform will be promoted in time.

          Internationally, house property tax refers to levying tax on all houses based on value appraisals. Only when a residential property tax is imposed on all houses can such a move be considered fair, and benefit the local governments and the grassroots taxation system. Global experiences show the local governments of a country that levy a residential property tax also enjoy sufficient transfer of payment from higher levels of governments or the central government.

          But in China, such transfers of payments are limited, which means income from house property tax will not be enough to meet the local governments' expenditure.

          Besides, one of the difficulties in levying a property tax on individuals and households is that it is imposed on a natural person's real estate asset that doesn't necessarily produce direct cash flow. And since levying individual income tax on natural persons is difficult in China, imposing tax on an individual's real estate asset, which doesn't produce cash flow, will be equally, if not more, difficult.

          To successfully levy such a tax on individuals, the authorities should first win the support of the majority of the people.

          Individual property tax programs were piloted in Chongqing and Shanghai on Jan 28, 2011. But the continuously rising housing prices in these cities have prevented the people from being convinced that a property tax would effectively check the trend to a large extent.

          Whether property tax can curb rising housing prices depends on the form and structure of the real estate market. If the real estate market is a seller's market, the property tax will be paid by the homebuyers. And it will be difficult for homebuyers to transfer the property tax which they have to pay every year by deducting it from the total housing price.

          Under such circumstances, a more likely result would be homebuyers paying for their property according to prevailing prices and shouldering the property tax burden in the future.

          Some people assume imposing a property tax could accelerate the development of house rental market. But since even homeowners who rent out their houses have to pay the property tax, they are likely to transfer the cost to the tenants. In that case, the property tax can hardly help improve people's livelihoods.

          In addition, when the real estate market is sluggish, the property tax might probably become the last straw that breaks the market's back. A rapid slump in the real estate market could lead to a financial crisis, even fiscal crisis, undermining social stability, which none of us wants to see.

          Accelerating legislation on property tax and promoting tax reform in time are necessary. But some people suppose China's property tax system design should follow the model of developed countries, which is wrong considering China's special land ownership system. In China, urban land belongs to the State and rural land to collectives. Given the public ownership of land, the local governments can generate income from the transfer of land-use rights. This system is different from those followed by most other countries.

          Moreover, the house property taxation system should also take the paying capacity of households into consideration. Because of the high housing prices and comparatively low individual incomes, a large number of people cannot afford to pay a high residential property tax even if they are willing to do so. And under what rules will the property tax be imposed on welfare-oriented houses that were sold at very low prices?

          Any discrepancy here could undermine the fairness of levying the property tax.

          Therefore, while enacting the property tax, complicated problems should be fully discussed in order to avoid the negative social effects of imposing such a tax in a hurry.

          The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          =

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: a级毛片毛片免费观看久潮| 99国产欧美精品久久久蜜芽| 久久精品国产999大香线焦 | 日本视频一区二区三区1| 国产精品一二三入口播放| 国内精品视频一区二区三区八戒| 亚洲av影院一区二区三区| 色婷婷综合视频在线观看视频一区| 久久青草国产精品一区| 国产精品中文字幕一二三| 国产无套护士在线观看| 秋霞电影网| 婷婷四房播播| 日本大片在线看黄a∨免费| 二区中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品成人aaaaa网站| 欧美性猛交xxxx免费看| 亚洲无码熟妇人妻AV在线| 国产精品不卡一区二区在线| 国产精品久久福利新婚之夜| 亚洲成AV人片在线观看麦芽| 久久99爰这里有精品国产| 男人天堂亚洲天堂女人天堂| 丁香五月婷激情综合第九色| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 亚洲熟妇无码爱V在线观看| 91精品国产自产在线蜜臀| 亚洲中文字幕日产无码成人片| 亚洲暴爽av天天爽日日碰| 蜜桃一区二区免费视频观看| 亚洲中文字幕精品第三区| 欧美黑人性暴力猛交在线视频| 国产精品午夜性视频| 久久夜色精品亚洲国产av| 97人妻精品一区二区三区| 成人乱码一区二区三区四区| 精品无码黑人又粗又大又长 | 国内精品免费久久久久电影院97 | 中文字幕日韩一区二区不卡| www.亚洲国产| 日本三级香港三级三级人妇久|