<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
            Home>News Center>Life
                   
           

          Smashing our way to law reform
          By Zhang Zhenlian (Shanghai Star)
          Updated: 2004-04-16 15:47

          On March 15, a couple from Harbin in Northeast China publicly smashed a Toshiba rear-projection TV into pieces in the pouring rain. They did so to express their anger and frustration that the TV, having already undergone numerous repairs and replacements, still failed to function properly and the seller or the manufacturer had shown every reluctance to solve the problem or pay a refund.


          Zhang Xianfeng smashes his Toshiba rear-projection TV, bought five years ago at 18,500 yuan (US$2,200) March 15, the Consumer's Right Day to vent his anger. [Harbin Daily]
          The act was staged to take place on March 15, "Consumer's Rights Day". It was a deliberate move by the couple to show their despair about current consumer protection laws in China and all the practical frustrations they have met in the past five years, ever since buying the TV in 1999 for 18,500 yuan (US$2,200).

          A similar sensational event took place about four years ago when the owner of a Mercedes-Benz car in Wuhan of Hubei Province in Central China, smashed the vehicle in public out of similar anger and in an attempt to attract the attention of the manufacturer and retailer.

          Prevalent legal views about similar events are that: consumers are better advised to settle the mater through legal means (by way of the product liability law and consumers protection law), for example); and although consumers are entitled to dispose of their property in any manner they like, such disposal must be in compliance with relevant laws and regulations, in particular, such disposal shall not be conducted in a way that damages the reputation of relevant parties (the manufacturer or the seller) without good cause.

          It seems that nowadays, people's attention can only be captured by smashing, explosion and suicide. Otherwise, no one can drag me away from my own business. So a "small potato" has to stir some attention by way of smashing; the media has to stir some attention by way of reporting the smashing; and commentators have to stir some attention by way of commenting on the smashing.

          So smashing news is very distinctive in the newspapers and it remains in people's memory for a long time.

          But it only remains in people's memory, not on their agenda.

          Four years have passed since the last smashing news, but China's consumer protection legal regime remains unchanged.

          When the Harbin couple was interviewed about their reason for the smashing, among other things, they expressed their particular anger about the strange and unreasonable provision in the product quality examination and appraisal regulations promulgated in 1999, which requires consent from both parties to a product quality dispute (ie, both the consumer and the manufacturer or the seller) for a proper and valid application to the relevant authorities for such examination and appraisal.

          But who would be glad to have his or her own defective product examined by the government by simply giving his or her consent? And without proper government proof of product quality (which would only come after an unworthily protracted period of time), it would be really hard time for the couple to go any further down the legal path.

          This is only a sample of examples to show how an otherwise smooth or workable channel of dispute resolution is blocked by an unwise design of the system. In other aspects of our life and in other parts of the world, there are numerous examples and lessons where the unavailability or inaccessibility of a proper and creditable dispute resolution system has caused or is causing or will cause "smashing".

          It is to the benefit of all that a society should provide reasonable and smooth methods of dispute resolution.

           
            Today's Top News     Top Life News
           

          China foils US anti-China human rights motion

           

             
           

          Tung tells NPC of need for election change

           

             
           

          US: China does not manipulate currency

           

             
           

          269.7 kg of heroin found in beehives

           

             
           

          Purported bin Laden 'truce' is rejected

           

             
           

          Private car ownership sparks problems

           

             
            Smashing our way to law reform
             
            Rows with teenage daughters can be good - report
             
            'Fat' ballerina loses $1 million damages case
             
            Capital kids are alright
             
            US transgender teen 'executed'
             
            Movies tie China and France
             
           
            Go to Another Section  
           
           
            Story Tools  
             
            Related Stories  
             
          Professors urges consumer rights education
            Feature  
            Campus ballads tune to yesterday melodies  
          Advertisement
                   
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 把女人弄爽大黄A大片片| 精品视频福利| 成人动漫综合网| 91国内精品久久精品一本 | 国产在线线精品宅男网址| 999福利激情视频| 精品精品亚洲高清a毛片| 国产AV影片麻豆精品传媒| 日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩熟女| 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区| 午夜视频免费试看| 国产粉嫩美女一区二区三| 樱花草视频www日本韩国| 色噜噜在线视频免费观看| 国产成人午夜福利院| 最新亚洲国产手机在线| 亚洲V天堂V手机在线| 日韩精品亚洲 国产| 男女xx00xx的视频免费观看| 性视频一区| 偷拍精品一区二区三区| 99国产精品久久久久久久成人热| 亚洲 欧美 视频 手机在线| 欧美视频网站www色| 成人一区二区三区激情视频| 九九热在线视频只有精品| 欧美丰满妇大ass| 精品国产国语对白主播野战| 人妻体体内射精一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三| 亚洲日韩精品伊甸| 欧美亚洲一区二区三区在线| 毛片内射久久久一区| 日韩精品亚洲专区在线观看| 99精品视频在线观看婷婷| 暖暖视频免费观看| 中文字幕乱码亚洲无线| 亚洲国产中文在线有精品| 熟女性饥渴一区二区三区| 日本中文字幕久久网站| 99精品国产闺蜜国产在线闺蜜|