<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
            Home>News Center>World
                   
           

          Agent Orange plaintiffs condemn US court
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2005-03-11 15:10

          Vietnamese Agent Orange victims have angrily condemned a US court's dismissal of their lawsuit accusing a string of US chemical firms of crimes against humanity and pledged to continue their legal battle.

          A New York judge threw out the case, filed on behalf of millions of Vietnamese harmed by the war-era defoliant, on Thursday, saying it had no basis in law.

          10-year-old Tran Binh Minhn (L) and 11-year-old Pham Thi Thuy Linh, both Agent Orange victims and handicap, learn to write with their feet at the Peace Village in Tu Du hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Victims have angrily condemned a US court dismissal of their lawsuit against a string of US chemical firms alleging crimes against humanity. [AFP/File]
          10-year-old Tran Binh Minhn (L) and 11-year-old Pham Thi Thuy Linh, both Agent Orange victims and handicap, learn to write with their feet at the Peace Village in Tu Du hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Victims have angrily condemned a US court dismissal of their lawsuit against a string of US chemical firms alleging crimes against humanity. [AFP/File]
          "It is a wrong decision, unfair and irresponsible," said Nguyen Trong Nhan, vice president of Vietnam's Association for Victims of Agent Orange (VAVA), saying the legal fight would continue.

          "This is just another war that could be long and difficult, as was the Vietnam war. We are determined to pursue it until the very end, until the day we will be able to ask for justice," he told AFP.

          Agent Orange was used by the US Army in the 1954-1975 Vietnam War to clear the jungle and prevent enemy forces from being able to use the dense foliage for cover.

          A Vietnamese Agent Orange victim looks on at Hoa Binh (Peace) village, a hospice for Agent Orange victims in Hanoi on December 14, 2004. A federal judge on March 11 dismissed a lawsuit that accused chemical companies of committing war crimes by supplying the U.S. military with Agent Orange in the Vietnam War, saying they did not violate U.S. or international law. Picture taken on December 14, 2004. REUTERS/Kham
          A Vietnamese Agent Orange victim looks on at Hoa Binh (Peace) village, a hospice for Agent Orange victims in Hanoi on December 14, 2004. Picture taken on December 14, 2004.[Reuters/file]
          The lawsuit, against firms including pharmaceutical giants Monsanto, Dow Chemical and Hercules Incorporated, won mass support in Vietnam where 11.5 million people signed a petition, according to official figures.

          Heart-rending pictures such as a child with a distorted face, a legless woman walking on her hands and two babies fused together in a single body have hit Vietnamese newspapers in recent weeks.

          But district court judge Jack Weinstein said there was no law that could enforce the plaintiffs' claim that the firms were guilty of crimes against humanity for making Agent Orange available.

          "There is no basis for any of the claims of plaintiffs under the domestic law of any nation or state or under any form of international law. The case is dismissed," the judge said.

          The US-based Fund for Reconciliation and Development (FRD) said the judge's decision made it easier for the United States to "continue to evade moral responsibility for the consequences of its actions."

          "Regardless of how much chemical companies and the US government knew about the poisonous dioxin... they should not hide behind legal and scientific technicalities to avoid facing their obligation...," FRD Executive Director John McAuliff said.

          In theory, the decision can be appealed and then taken to the US Supreme Court.

          Some Vietnamese experts believe an appeal could be possible on the legal precedent of a 1984 class action settlement, when manufacturers agreed to pay 180 million dollars to US war veterans who died or became ill after exposure to defoliants.

          "If the medical files (of Vietnamese victims) are not convincing enough, we will use the ones of the American soldiers," said in Tuoi Tre newspaper Professor Ngo Thanh Nhan, who participated in the campaign to drum up support for the case.

          "There's no reason why those who sprayed chemical products got compensation for their contamination... and the direct victims' suit is rejected by an American court."

          Several Vietnamese papers condemned the decision.

          "It is not only a legal matter. The two aspects, legal and moral, have to be examined," said Nguyen Van Tuan, an Australian scientist of Vietnamese origin, in the Tuoi Tre newspaper.

          "The US are today the first world power... and they have to admit their fault... and take concrete measures to reduce the pain of millions of victims in the country."

          "We wonder why the United States allow themselves to teach Vietnam lessons about human rights as they try to avoid their responsibilities...," said the People's Army mouthpiece, Quan Doi Nhan Dan.

          In September, the US State Department singled out Vietnam as a "country of particular concern" over its abuse of religious freedom.



           
            Today's Top News     Top World News
           

          Tung Chee-hwa resigns as HK chief executive

           

             
           

          Steps to narrow rich-poor gap needed

           

             
           

          Money talks in capturing drug suspect

           

             
           

          Farming sets goals to raise productivity

           

             
           

          Peninsula likely to top Rice's first visit

           

             
           

          Suicide bomber kills 47 at Iraq funeral

           

             
            Gunmen break up Fatah party meeting
             
            Spain marks anniversary of March 11 train bombings
             
            Suicide bomber kills 47 at Iraq funeral
             
            Clinton resting after successful surgery
             
            Peninsula likely to top Rice's first visit
             
            14 die in helicopter crash in Chechnya
             
           
            Go to Another Section  
           
           
            Story Tools  
             
            News Talk  
            Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
          Advertisement
                   
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩深夜福利视频在线观看 | 日韩在线观看中文字幕| 国产成人女人毛片视频在线| 亚洲午夜亚洲精品国产成人| 欧美人与动zozo在线播放| 亚洲无码精品视频| 亚洲国产精品自在拍在线播放蜜臀 | 99精品热在线在线观看视| 99精品电影一区二区免费看| 国产精品国产三级国产专业| 任我爽精品视频在线播放| 成人精品自拍视频免费看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久大师 | 国产精品不卡一区二区三区| 国产三级精品三级在线观看| 精品无码一区二区三区电影| 激情人妻中出中文字幕一区| 狠狠色狠狠综合久久| 中文字幕无码久久精品| 亚洲黄片一区二区三区| 99久久精品费精品国产一区二| 国内精品卡一卡二卡三| 真实国产老熟女无套内射| 在线播放国产不卡免费视频| 日韩av一区二区高清不卡| 国产一区二区三区精品综合| 精品一区精品二区制服| 亚洲qingse中文字幕久久| 99在线国内在线视频22| 久久久一本精品99久久精品88| 久久人妻精品白浆国产| 日本一道一区二区视频| 国产做a爱免费视频在线观看| 男女激情一区二区三区| 真人无码作爱免费视频| 精品一区二区免费不卡| 亚洲欧美乱综合图片区小说区| 国99久9在线 | 免费| 男人资源最新资源网站| 九九热在线视频免费观看| 思思热在线视频精品|