<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Unbalanced economy reduces upward mobility for young people

          Updated: 2012-11-24 06:37

          By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Having lost the 2012 presidential election, the Republican Party of the United States might have also lost what some political analysts called "the culture war".

          In an commentary on CNN Opinion, contributor William Bennett, who was secretary of education during part of the Reagan administration, cited a breakdown of election exit polls and contended that the Republicans have lost touch with young people between the ages of 18 and 29.

          The Republican's perceived stance of siding with business is losing appeal among young voters. More and more of those voters favor socialism to capitalism, according to Bennett. He noted that results of a Pew Research poll taken in 2011 showed that 49 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 have a positive view of socialism while just 46 percent have a positive view of capitalism.

          Reading this made me wonder if the decidedly pro-business Hong Kong government has also lost a culture war when the young people of this free-market economy are becoming increasingly agitated by what they see as the failure of free market forces, favoring only the super-rich who make up one or two percent of the population. The government has conceded that its traditional hands-off social and economic policy is showing its age. But it has disappointed increasingly impatient young people by failing to articulate a credible vision for change.

          Nobody in Hong Kong is known to have polled our young people's views on capitalism. Past success seems to have convinced policy makers that capitalism, in its rather elementary form, is best for Hong Kong.

          It is with a sense of pride that the government talks of itself as the "facilitator" of economic development. In its narrower sense, the "facilitator" does not consider a matter for its concern the distribution of the fruits of economic growth. Instead it trusts market forces to ensure a trickle down of wealth. But the notion that creating an economic environment that allows the top one percent of the population to get richer will increase employment and raise workers' wages has proven to be wrong in Hong Kong and elsewhere.

          To be sure, unemployment has not been too big an issue in Hong Kong in the past several years. But what people consider as "good" jobs, which pay decent salaries and promise prospects of reasonable career advancement, are becoming scarce outside the confines of the financial and property sectors. This has greatly dampened the hopes and expectations of a growing number of families, especially those in the middle-class struggling with the escalating apartment rental and property prices.

          Although the economy is growing, it is widely seen to have benefited only the small minority at the top of the economic ladder. Indeed, the wealth gap has been widening through the destruction of the middle class by the unbalanced economic structure that is too dependent on finance and property.

          Capitalism in Hong Kong is not entirely without heart. Other than favoring businesses, the government traditionally has focused its social services spending on providing housing and other subsidies to the poorest segment of the society. Nearly half the population is now housed in government-built apartments at heavily subsidized rents. Like all Hong Kong citizens, these individuals enjoy nearly free medical service and 11 years' of free education for their children.

          In the past, many entrepreneurs, business leaders, professionals and senior civil servants came from modest families in government housing estates. In those days, the manufacturing-based economy was conducive to social mobility. Capitalism, even in its rudimentary form, worked in Hong Kong and market forces could be counted on to facilitate an acceptable trickle down of wealth.

          But the young people of today are frustrated to see that the door for social and economic advancement is closing on them through the functions of the unbalanced economy. I remember that as a younger man in the early 1980s, I once felt immensely proud to be a Hong Kong person walking down the cavernous Central subway station thinking that I had contributed, even in some remote way, of making this happen. I wonder if there is anything in Hong Kong that can make a young man feel as proud of himself and as confident about his future. If you can, please let me know.

          The author is a current affairs commentator.

          (HK Edition 11/24/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一区二区三区亚洲精品| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品四虎| 亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区| 日本一区二区三区黄色| 亚洲一区二区美女av| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪网不卡| 国产主播一区二区三区| 黄色不卡视频一区二区三区 | 国产在线一区二区在线视频| 日日躁夜夜躁狠狠躁超碰97| 天天综合网色中文字幕| 在线精品自拍亚洲第一区| 国产黄色三级三级看三级| 日韩一二三无码专区| 深夜在线观看免费av| 性色av一区二区三区夜夜嗨| 亚洲色在线v中文字幕| 亚洲天堂视频网| 国产精品久久香蕉免费播放| 亚洲午夜福利AV一区二区无码| 18禁超污无遮挡无码网址 | 国产av无码专区亚洲aⅴ| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 精品无人区卡一卡二卡三乱码 | 色综合热无码热国产| 国产午夜精品一区二区三| 秋霞AV鲁丝片一区二区| 国产高清看片日韩欧美久久| 在线视频中文字幕二区| 国产无遮挡又黄又爽不要vip软件| 亚洲区一区二区激情文学| 好爽好紧好大的免费视频| 亚洲一区二区三区av链接| 老熟妇乱子交视频一区| AV国内高清啪啪| 亚洲日韩国产精品第一页一区| 久久91精品国产一区二区| 久久香蕉国产线看观看怡红院妓院| 久久99精品久久久久久齐齐百度| 亚洲日本韩国欧美云霸高清| 日韩人妻无码精品系列|