<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Unbalanced economy reduces upward mobility for young people

          Updated: 2012-11-24 06:37

          By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Having lost the 2012 presidential election, the Republican Party of the United States might have also lost what some political analysts called "the culture war".

          In an commentary on CNN Opinion, contributor William Bennett, who was secretary of education during part of the Reagan administration, cited a breakdown of election exit polls and contended that the Republicans have lost touch with young people between the ages of 18 and 29.

          The Republican's perceived stance of siding with business is losing appeal among young voters. More and more of those voters favor socialism to capitalism, according to Bennett. He noted that results of a Pew Research poll taken in 2011 showed that 49 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 have a positive view of socialism while just 46 percent have a positive view of capitalism.

          Reading this made me wonder if the decidedly pro-business Hong Kong government has also lost a culture war when the young people of this free-market economy are becoming increasingly agitated by what they see as the failure of free market forces, favoring only the super-rich who make up one or two percent of the population. The government has conceded that its traditional hands-off social and economic policy is showing its age. But it has disappointed increasingly impatient young people by failing to articulate a credible vision for change.

          Nobody in Hong Kong is known to have polled our young people's views on capitalism. Past success seems to have convinced policy makers that capitalism, in its rather elementary form, is best for Hong Kong.

          It is with a sense of pride that the government talks of itself as the "facilitator" of economic development. In its narrower sense, the "facilitator" does not consider a matter for its concern the distribution of the fruits of economic growth. Instead it trusts market forces to ensure a trickle down of wealth. But the notion that creating an economic environment that allows the top one percent of the population to get richer will increase employment and raise workers' wages has proven to be wrong in Hong Kong and elsewhere.

          To be sure, unemployment has not been too big an issue in Hong Kong in the past several years. But what people consider as "good" jobs, which pay decent salaries and promise prospects of reasonable career advancement, are becoming scarce outside the confines of the financial and property sectors. This has greatly dampened the hopes and expectations of a growing number of families, especially those in the middle-class struggling with the escalating apartment rental and property prices.

          Although the economy is growing, it is widely seen to have benefited only the small minority at the top of the economic ladder. Indeed, the wealth gap has been widening through the destruction of the middle class by the unbalanced economic structure that is too dependent on finance and property.

          Capitalism in Hong Kong is not entirely without heart. Other than favoring businesses, the government traditionally has focused its social services spending on providing housing and other subsidies to the poorest segment of the society. Nearly half the population is now housed in government-built apartments at heavily subsidized rents. Like all Hong Kong citizens, these individuals enjoy nearly free medical service and 11 years' of free education for their children.

          In the past, many entrepreneurs, business leaders, professionals and senior civil servants came from modest families in government housing estates. In those days, the manufacturing-based economy was conducive to social mobility. Capitalism, even in its rudimentary form, worked in Hong Kong and market forces could be counted on to facilitate an acceptable trickle down of wealth.

          But the young people of today are frustrated to see that the door for social and economic advancement is closing on them through the functions of the unbalanced economy. I remember that as a younger man in the early 1980s, I once felt immensely proud to be a Hong Kong person walking down the cavernous Central subway station thinking that I had contributed, even in some remote way, of making this happen. I wonder if there is anything in Hong Kong that can make a young man feel as proud of himself and as confident about his future. If you can, please let me know.

          The author is a current affairs commentator.

          (HK Edition 11/24/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品福利自产拍久久| 亚洲国产精品久久电影欧美 | 日韩有码中文在线观看| 亚洲成A人一区二区三区| 边添小泬边狠狠躁视频| 国产AV午夜精品一区二区三区| 2020国产成人精品视频| 日本一区二区三区在线 |观看| 国产成人最新三级在线视频| 国产a√精品区二区三区四区| 九九热视频免费在线播放| 91孕妇精品一区二区三区| 激情文学一区二区国产区| 韩国一级毛片中文字幕| 国产精品igao视频| 国产精品一区 在线播放| 人妻聚色窝窝人体WWW一区| 漂亮的小少妇诱惑内射系列| 精品国产成人国产在线观看| 天天爽天天爽天天爽| 欧美乱码伦视频免费| 亚洲成人av在线资源网| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽五月婷| 麻豆精品丝袜人妻久久| 亚洲av免费成人精品区| 在线精品国精品国产尤物| 91偷自国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美中文日韩V日本| 国产成人免费一区二区三区| 国产成人精品亚洲日本在线观看| 欧美怡红院视频一区二区三区| 不卡乱辈伦在线看中文字幕| 国产成人亚洲精品狼色在线| 91中文字幕在线一区| 亚洲精品二区在线观看| 不卡免费一区二区日韩av| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 国产欧美VA天堂在线观看视频 | 天美传媒xxxxhd videos3| 国产农村激情免费专区|