<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Increasing social mobility, education opportunities in HK

          Updated: 2012-12-29 07:54

          By Ho Shun-Man(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          It has been said that Hong Kong is "down streaming", i.e., that the quality of life of the middle class has been deteriorating. In recent years, there have been occasional media reports suggesting that many youngsters are dissatisfied with their employment, income and upward mobility, and are losing their self-confidence.

          A study by the Hong Kong Professional and Senior Executives Association (HKPSEA) in 2010, (for which this author was one of the investigators), found that 21 percent of the post-80s generation had experienced downward mobility and 74 percent had experienced no mobility over the past five years. Over half of them believed that social mobility was worse than 15 years ago.

          Many social leaders argue that social equality and mobility should be a major agenda item for the current administration. Higher social mobility is usually associated with more equal opportunities for all, greater recognition of personal effort and higher work motivation. In contrast, insufficient social mobility is associated with negative consequences, such as greater dissatisfaction over the gap between the rich and poor, lower social harmony and lower personal motivation to work hard.

          Many factors can affect social mobility and career achievement, such as personal attributes, family background, demographics, economic growth, the education system, labor market structure and other public policies. Slow economic growth after the global financial crisis clearly affected employment, incomes and social mobility in the short run. Stable economic growth is the most important external factor in improving social mobility. Recent studies have also found that a higher education level and a wealthier family background are associated with the likelihood of being in the middle class.

          In the HKPSEA study, over half of the respondents felt that the most significant obstacle to their social mobility was a lack of educational qualifications. Only about a third of the respondents blamed the economic situation or government policies, and only 17 percent attributed their lack of mobility to their less fortunate family background. About two thirds of these post-80s respondents agreed that pursing post-secondary education can increase social mobility, and 77 percent agreed with the statement that "personal hard work and other non-family factors are more important than family background". Over two thirds of the youngsters still regarded Hong Kong as a fair place with plenty of mobility opportunities. They indicated a willingness to pursue further education to raise their academic qualifications and enhance their career prospects. Such a positive attitude is somewhat different from what is sometimes reported in the media.

          Fair or equal educational opportunities can be seen as the minimum assurance for greater social mobility. Although educational equality may not necessarily lead to social equality, educational inequality can deepen social inequality. Therefore, we need to ensure maximum education equality, especially for lower-income families.

          In terms of educational equality, the minimum the government can do is to ensure educational resources are invested fairly. Unfortunately, the quotas of UGC-funded first-degree places has been frozen at 14,500 since 1994 (only 18 percent of the age-group versus the world average of 26 percent), and this is far from being able to satisfy the need of some 26,000 applicants who meet the minimum university entrance requirements (with another 24,000 students who did not meet this requirement).

          Most students who are not admitted to UGC-funded first-degree programs are forced to enter high-cost self-financed sub-degree (or some first-degree) programs) with little or no government subsidies (except loans). This creates a heavy financial burden for many lower-income families. Furthermore, only a small percentage of those associate degree graduates can ultimately be admitted to a funded top-up degree programme.

          In fact, only 26 percent of Hong Kong's workforce has tertiary qualifications, and this has put Hong Kong far behind the majority of developed economies. To ensure more equal opportunities for post-secondary education and to sustain Hong Kong's international competitiveness, many Hong Kong people have urged the government to increase funding substantially and urgently to allow more young people to pursue funded first-degree studies.

          The author is a senior university professor and administrator.

          (HK Edition 12/29/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕亚洲制服在线看| 欲色欲色天天天www| 亚洲色大成永久WW网站| 亚洲精品成人综合色在线| 久久夜夜免费视频| 377P欧洲日本亚洲大胆| 免费av网站| 色伦专区97中文字幕| 综合久久婷婷综合久久| 男人添女人下部高潮视频| 五月开心六月丁香综合色啪| 少妇宾馆粉嫩10p| 国产精品国产三级国av| 日本一区二区三区小视频| 日韩精品卡一卡二卡三卡四| 色综合色综合久久综合频道| 欧美高清狂热视频60一70| 另类专区一区二区三区| 国产三级精品三级在线看| 久久五月精品综合网中文字幕| 亚洲情综合五月天| 国产午夜精品一二区理论影院| 日本一区二区三区看片| 蜜桃av无码免费看永久| 精品一区二区三区四区激情| 国产亚洲精品AA片在线播放天| 久久一日本道色综合久久| 国产在线乱子伦一区二区| 国产成人AV大片大片在线播放 | 成人拍拍拍无遮挡免费视频| 欧美久久精品一级c片免费| 无码国模国产在线观看免费| 中文熟妇人妻av在线| 亚洲另类丝袜综合网| 老熟女乱了伦| 久久这里只有精品免费首页| 国产精品人成视频免费播放| 亚洲最大天堂在线看视频| 久久国产自偷自免费一区| 国产福利片一区二区三区| 啪啪av一区二区三区|