<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          Updated: 2017-06-13 07:05

          By Joseph Li in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Former chief secretary for administration Henry Tang Ying-yen believes Hong Kong people, including the legal profession, must accept that the country's top legislature has the lawful authority to exercise interpretations of the Basic Law, and that there was a need to interpret the Basic Law on each occasion.

          Since the handover in 1997, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has interpreted provisions of the Basic Law on five occasions.

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          "The Basic Law has clearly spelt out that the NPCSC has the power to interpret the Basic Law and the NPCSC will not exercise an interpretation without reasons," he said.

          "We have seen five interpretations of Basic Law provisions since 1997 and each interpretation was justified. They include interpretations related to the right of abode case in 1999, the term of office of the Chief Executive in 2005 and the Congo case in 2011 because it involved foreign affairs," he explained.

          In a recent newspaper interview Andrew Li Kwok-nang, former chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal, said the latest interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 related to oaths and disqualification of certain Legislative Council members last year yielded a negative public impression on judicial independence in Hong Kong. This is because it occurred before the court ruling.

          Tang disagreed but said he understood why the former chief justice made such comments.

          He said: "For the case of LegCo oath fiasco, the timing of interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 before the ruling was appropriate. If the interpretation took place after the ruling and the ruling happened to be inconsistent with the interpretation, people would grumble that the interpretation in effect overturned the court verdict."

          Tang, however, admitted the interpretation on the right-of-abode case in 1999 was highly controversial because it was the very first time the NPCSC interpreted Basic Law provisions. It happened after the Court of Final Appeal had handed down a ruling.

          joseph@chinadailyhk.com

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          (HK Edition 06/13/2017 page4)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品在线+在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区久久综合| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 国产精品色内内在线观看| 中年国产丰满熟女乱子正在播放 | 日韩精品高清自在线| 美国又粗又长久久性黄大片| 国内精品大秀视频日韩精品| 欧美偷窥清纯综合图区| 国产成人亚洲综合色婷婷秒播| 18禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 国产精品有码在线观看| 亚洲精品无播放器在线播放| 久久人与动人物a级毛片| 国产高清午夜人成在线观看,| 亚洲欧洲av人一区二区| 欧美xxxxhd高清| 久久欧洲精品成av人片| 性夜黄a爽影免费看| 嫩草研究院久久久精品| 国产愉拍精品手机| 日韩精品视频一二三四区| 欧洲一区二区中文字幕| 欧美FREESEX黑人又粗又大| 国产普通话对白刺激| 久久婷婷成人综合色综合| 99久久免费国产精品| 四房播色综合久久婷婷| 亚洲中文字幕有综合久久| 国产日产精品系列| 日韩丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久精品伊人无码二区| 国产午夜在线观看视频播放| 97欧美精品系列一区二区| 999在线视频精品免费播放观看| 国产对白老熟女正在播放| 久久亚洲精品国产精品| 九九热视频在线免费观看| 亚洲国产成人久久综合一区| 成人亚洲精品一区二区三区| 成人在线视频一区|