<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Non-bank mortgage loans a time bomb in the making

          Updated: 2017-09-22 06:05

          (HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Homebuyers who secured financing on "generous" terms from lending companies associated with property developers would be shocked to find out how much more they have to pay in interest compared with regular bank mortgage loans.

          The latest revelation from the Consumer Council showed the total interest cost of a 20-year mortgage loan from a lending company to finance 90 percent of the HK$8 million purchase price of an average-sized apartment would amount to a whopping HK$5 million.

          Non-bank mortgage loans a time bomb in the making

          Of course, banks are restricted to lending no more than 70 percent of the purchase price in mortgage financing. A buyer of an apartment of similar price who can afford the 30-percent down payment to secure a bank loan at a lower credit cost would only have to pay less than HK$2 million in interest, the council's report showed.

          Apparently, the vast difference in mortgage interest charges between lending companies and banks is not well known to many homebuyers. Recent market studies have shown a rapid increase in non-bank mortgage lending as home prices continued to surge.

          The Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the city's de facto central bank, has issued some warnings about the high cost of non-bank loans but has yet to produce figures that could drive home the point as strongly and effectively as those compiled by the Consumer Council. On this matter, the central bank can find a convenient excuse. The supervision of non-bank lenders does not come under its jurisdiction.

          But as a de facto central bank, which has the added duty of supervising banks, it is wrong to shirk its moral responsibility by hiding behind a veil of bureaucracy. Central banks in other developed economies are often seen to take an active and upfront role in addressing financial issues that have a direct impact on public interests.

          The question is whether there is any justification for Hong Kong to continue wasting large sums of public funds every year in maintaining a central bank which, in essence, is not really a central bank. The duties of the HKMA - managing the linked exchange rate system, investing the exchange fund and, yes, supervising banks - can be carried out just as effectively and at much lower costs by the relevant government departments within the finance branch.

          It doesn't really take much professional skill to manage the linked exchange rate system as long as it is backed, as is the case in Hong Kong, by large fiscal reserves and a highly disciplined budgetary policy. Critics have argued that it would be more profitable to entrust the exchange fund to professional fund managers with credible investment records. In most other developed economies, supervision of banks is a separate function outside the central bank to avoid any potential conflict of interest.

          Instead of taking the initiative, the HKMA allowed the lowly (in terms of budget) Consumer Council, which doesn't even have legal teeth, to expose the real cost of those mortgage loan terms that have been described more than once by the gullible media as "generous" to the borrowers. To be sure, the disclosure, illustrated by figures and tables, is not going to kill off those loans. They are the only option to prospective homebuyers who cannot afford the high deposits to secure bank mortgages.

          It is hoped that awareness of the high interest costs for non-bank financing can discourage others from being misled to make long-term commitments that are clearly not in their interests.

          More important, the proliferation of high-interest non-bank mortgage loans could greatly magnify the impact of a sharp correction in property prices which many economists have warned is long overdue. Those borrowers of low-deposit loans would be the ones to find themselves caught in the negative-equity dilemma and the high interest costs of such loans could force them to opt for default.

          The resultant fallout would threaten the integrity of the banking system because banks are a major funding source of many non-bank lenders. The Consumer Council has done its job, though belatedly. Now is the time for the HKMA to act.

          The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

          (HK Edition 09/22/2017 page1)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲日韩图片专区第1页| 日韩精品无码一区二区视频 | 一本到综在合线伊人| 免费人欧美成又黄又爽的视频| 亚洲欧美偷国产日韩| 亚洲色欲色欲在线大片| 免费观看欧美猛交视频黑人| 少妇被粗大的猛烈进出动视频| 日本黄色三级一区二区三区| 最新精品国偷自产在线| 国产色a在线观看| 中国女人熟毛茸茸A毛片| 啦啦啦啦www日本在线观看 | 婷婷婷国产在线视频| 2019亚洲午夜无码天堂| 国产剧情福利AV一区二区| 91久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜| 久久精品人妻无码一区二区三区| 亚洲综合一区无码精品| 日韩精品区一区二区三vr| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片DVD| 亚洲国产在一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品成人| 欧美中文一区| 天天澡日日澡狠狠欧美老妇| 亚洲岛国av一区二区| 日韩中文字幕有码午夜美女| 中文字幕av一区二区三区 | 伊人精品成人久久综合97| 男女啪啪激烈无遮挡动态图| 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天| 亚洲国产欧美中文丝袜日韩| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲欧美色一区二区三区| 2019天天拍拍天天爽视频| 秋霞鲁丝片成人无码| 宝贝几天没c你了好爽菜老板| 四虎成人在线观看免费| 91娇喘视频| 天天澡日日澡狠狠欧美老妇| 西西大胆午夜人体视频|