<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          News >Bizchina

          Interest rates stifle small firms

          2011-07-19 13:57

          Interest rates stifle small firms

          China's inflation escalated to the highest level in three years, with the consumer price index (CPI), the main gauge of inflation, jumping 6.4 percent year-on-year in June. Chinese leaders have vowed to give priority to combating inflation. To contain China's stubbornly high inflation, the central bank has raised the benchmark interest rates three times this year, including the latest rate hike of 25 basis points announced on July 6.

          However, the bold moves to tame inflation are driving small companies out of business. Companies that were successful and profitable are struggling as their costs of borrowing soar. To help them survive, as strange as it may seem, benchmark interest rates should be raised much higher.

          Companies wanting to borrow money in China currently operate in a two-tier system. Those that can borrow from commercial banks are typically large scale and well connected, and include most State-owned enterprises (SOEs). Their cost of borrowing has been low - consistently lower than in India or Brazil - for example, over most of the past decade, even when differences in inflation are taken into account.

          But the government rations the amount that banks can lend to keep a lid on monetary growth, so the companies that are left out have to turn elsewhere, to trust companies, informal networks or underground banks.

          This second tier of companies faces much higher costs for borrowing. Medium-sized companies can expect to pay annual rates of about 20 percent and small companies can face interest rates double that.

          When the government forces banks to limit lending, pushing some companies from the first tier to the second, interest rates for the latter group rise, and it is the smaller companies that come off worst.

          Small companies everywhere are more vulnerable to economic shocks. But the difficulty they face borrowing from banks means their position is particularly precarious in China. This has broad implications. Small companies are often the source of innovation, particularly in services. On the whole, smaller companies create more jobs relative to output than larger ones. Accordingly, if China's small companies struggle, so will the government in its efforts to boost the growth of both the service sector and consumption. If China's up-and-coming innovators are starved of funds, the economy's long-run rate of growth is likely to be lower too.

          There are other losers in addition to the companies that are beaten in the competition for scarce bank loans. The companies that come out on top are able to borrow cheaply. But this is only possible because banks offer miserly rates of interest to depositors. Chinese families are effectively subsidizing the country's SOEs.

          A better system would see loans going to the companies that can invest most profitably, regardless of their size or political connections. The best way to achieve that end would be to ration credit not by quantity but by price, by allowing interest rates to be set by the market. Benchmark interest rates would rise, but the cost of borrowing for many of China's most dynamic companies would fall.

          Unfortunately, this is unlikely to happen any time soon. Indeed, benchmark interest rates have probably risen as far as they will in the current cycle.

          The liberalization of interest rates is officially a long-term goal, but the government has good reasons for dragging its feet. For one thing, it is not certain that freeing interest rates would lead to significant changes in how loans are allocated today. No bank manager is likely to get into too much trouble for agreeing to a local SOE's request for funds, but China should be moving toward a system in which loan applications are assessed on their financial merits alone. Unfortunately, the banks have been moving the wrong way, with the recent loan-fuelled stimulus response making them appear more than ever like instruments of government policy.

          Bank managers have other reasons for preferring to lend to big, well-connected companies, because all things being equal, big companies are less likely to fail. It helps if lenders have the ability to sort the good from the bad. That is true today, but it would be even more important if interest rates were higher.

          After all, if one company is willing to pay a higher rate of interest than another for a loan, that might be because it has a profitable investment in mind, but, then again, it could be because the company is in such a bad way that it feels it has nothing to lose from one more roll of the dice. Similarly, charging higher interest rates could tempt otherwise prudent borrowers to take bigger risks in order to earn a return.

          Today, the skills needed to identify profitable investment opportunities are in short supply. This is why financial sector liberalization, much disparaged in the rest of the world since the financial crisis, is still essential in China. But progress remains slow, and that probably will not change until the repercussions of the wave of stimulus lending have been worked through. In the short term, a major increase in benchmark lending rates could threaten the viability of any number of ongoing projects.

          Simmering concerns that many stimulus borrowers will default, even at current interest rates, also holds back reform. A further reason both lending and deposit rates are still fixed today, with a wide spread between them, is to ensure that banks remain profitable, in anticipation that some of those profits will be needed to clean up a future increase in bad debt.

          In these circumstances the slow speed of financial sector reform is understandable.

          But the costs are real nonetheless, as the owners of any number of small and innovative but struggling businesses will confirm.

          The author is a senior China economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

           

          Related News:

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费看成人毛片无码视频| 熟妇人妻久久春色视频网| 8av国产精品爽爽ⅴa在线观看| 国产av综合一区二区三区| 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合久久来来去 | 国产高潮刺激叫喊视频| 日产精品久久久久久久蜜臀| 精品国产精品中文字幕| 免费观看又色又爽又黄的韩国 | 菠萝菠萝蜜午夜视频在线播放观看| 国语对白在线免费视频| 久久精品国产中文字幕| 中文字幕国产精品资源| 国产成人高清精品亚洲一区| 国产毛片基地| 内射视频福利在线观看| 欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区 | 成人精品网一区二区三区| 国产福利片无码区在线观看| 狠狠色婷婷久久综合频道日韩| 亚洲午夜伦费影视在线观看| 欧美黑人XXXX性高清版| 性欧美乱妇高清come| 美日韩精品一区三区二区| 在线精品亚洲一区二区绿巨人| 亚洲老妇女亚洲老熟女久| 999福利激情视频| 国产chinese男男gaygay网站| 少妇和邻居做不戴套视频| 性欧美video高清| 国产小受被做到哭咬床单GV| 成av免费大片黄在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品第二区| 国产亚洲无日韩乱码| 苍井空无码丰满尖叫高潮| 艳妇乳肉豪妇荡乳在线观看| 久久国产精品亚洲精品99| 一区二区三区岛国av毛片| 国产免费高清69式视频在线观看 | 成人午夜电影福利免费| 欧美日韩v中文在线|