<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          China
          Home / China / View

          Democracy or humility? Why not both?

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-01-28 08:25

          Recent shock polling results have opened the world's eyes to the fact that no form of government is totally flawless

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime prime minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, it is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development. But now, it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          A widespread sentiment within Western electorates, that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites, is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the US and Britain and may play a role in future outcomes of 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in Britain and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system - the people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and a recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures have taken a different road.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. To contact the writer at harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Editor's picks
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品店无码一区二区三区| 和艳妇在厨房好爽在线观看| 亚洲国产av无码精品无广告| 成人午夜视频在线| 欧美综合人人做人人爱| 麻豆国产精品VA在线观看| 野外做受三级视频| 亚洲AV无码国产精品夜色午夜 | 国产99视频精品免费专区| 久久精品国产久精国产思思| 91麻豆亚洲国产成人久久| 亚洲综合色婷婷中文字幕| 久久av高潮av喷水av无码| 最新永久免费AV无码网站| 国产免费无遮挡吃奶视频| 亚洲国产呦萝小初| 国产精品久久无中文字幕| 欧美特黄一免在线观看| 精品视频一区二区福利午夜| 国产精品免费中文字幕| 无码天堂亚洲国产av麻豆| 人妻少妇不满足中文字幕| 欧美videos粗暴| 国产成人精品午夜二三区| 少妇被粗大的猛烈进出69影院一| 亚洲福利精品一区二区三区| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇高清| 桃花岛亚洲成在人线AV| 伊人久久久av老熟妇色| 色综合天天综合| 午夜A理论片在线播放| 精品福利国产| 免费A级毛片中文字幕| 欧美综合在线观看| 久久人人97超碰精品| 午夜免费无码福利视频麻豆| 视频二区中文字幕在线| 少妇被搞高潮在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久| 欧美日韩北条麻妃一区二区| 色爱综合另类图片av|