<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Hedging structures for the financing of ipr's
          By Tommy Soebbing (China IP)
          Updated: 2011-07-13

          【Trade Secret】

          Hedging Structures for the Financing of IPR's

          By Tommy Soebbing

          Dr. Soebbing, LLM. Is Corporate Counsel & Member of Management Team at Deutsche Leasing Information Technology.

          I. Introduction

          The investment to build intellectual property (IP) can amount easily to triple-digit million Euros. Accordingly companies (inventing company) usually do not finance such an investment on their own. In cases the volume of credit has been exhausted with one financial intuition it makes sense to look for a financial vehicle that can be supported by a consortium of institutions and investors (e.g. banks, leasing companies and venture capital enterprises). Another benefit of this approach will be that with such a consortium the involved risks can be shared which makes the risks for a single investor more predictable. Therefore, an involved financing institution (first investor) will try to refinance its investment by selling a part of the stake (so-called forfaiting-French a forfeit which means without recourse to the seller). It is custom for refinancing institutions to demand the transfer of ownership of the IP to be to avoid to rely on the liquidity of the first investor or the inventing company. The key challenge in this context is that if more than one financial institution but there is only one IP asset that can be transferred as a security. With regard to traditional assets which are being financed a division might have been possible (e.g. financing of a whole car fleet only the number of cars need to be transferred which are required to secure the amount that has been financed). It is in the nature of IP that it cannot be divided. Accordingly the transfer to a number of financial investors is extremely difficult. A solution to this problem is the foundation of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) which is the sole owner of the IP in question. The investors can get a stake of such a company according to the investment which needs to be hedged.

          II. Intellectual Property as Assets

          The financing of traditional real estate or movable goods, either by lending or leasing structures, is part of the day-today commodity business of financial institutes. Even the financing of intellectual property is no longer new territory for such investors. However, the continuous growth and the increasing complexity with regard to the financing and refinancing of intellectual property by financial institutions are facing increasing challenges. This area promises exiting business opportunities for a rapidly growing number of investors in the field of intellectual property.

          Software products (also known as custom software as standard), concepts and studies which can be protected by copyright can be an interesting opportunity for investors. Accordingly the implementation of a new Enterprise Resource Planning System "ERP system" (e.g. based on Microsoft Dynamics NAV) or a new Core banking systems (possibly based on SAP Banking software), which consists of standard software, custom software, templates and frameworks, are effectively protected by copyright (except from the so-called customizing measures, i.e. adjusting the software to the needs of the customer).

          Trademarks, which are protected by trademark laws, are mainly of interest with regard to financing models in connection with sale and leaseback transactions. Needless to say that such models require that such trademark must be tradable at all and must be a brand of a certain value. A high value of a brand can be assumed if it is established and sustainable in the market. An example for such established and sustainable brands are Coca Cola, Lenovo or Porsche 911.

          The right to a name is protected by the law of names, appear to be not very interesting for the financial investors, because such right is difficult to measure, e.g. by increased revenues at first glance. This view has been strongly influenced by the internet hype in the late nineties. The law of names does not only protect names in general but also the assignment of names in URLs (uniform resource locator), such as www.superbowl.com. The value of such URLs equals the accessibility to potential customers and can therefore easily amount to millions.

          The financing of patents in particular for machine design patents and established pharmaceutical products certainly has a long tradition with specialized financial institutions. But the very creation of new products such as solar photovoltaic systems in the environmental technology and research for new drugs, e.g. against cancer or against Malaria, are an interesting and socially important for investment for such a financial investor Institute.

          These IP is the results from all creators, that they are not always divisible or not divisible. Certainly there are for example Copyright in the possibilities of co-authorship or the issuance of a rights-fold. In the light of copyright the possibility of co-authorship or the issuance of "quota-rights" may exist. However, this does not lead to the desired goal to be able to make a collateral assignment of such IP to protect according investments.

          III. Finance Model

          In case a company has successfully created new IP which was financed by debt, it usually turns a financial investor to cash in this new invention (e.g. by loans), by a leasing or a venture capital vehicle). It is custom for such an investor to secure the provision of cash (as a kind of loan hedging) by demanding the collateral assignment of the rights in the corresponding IP. In case the inventing company becomes insolvent, the financial investor can hold itself harmless by exploiting the IP.

          In cases the financial investor does not finance the investment on its one, there is the possibility to sale of future of receivables of potential financial claims against the inventing company (so-called forfaiting). In case the financial claim against the inventing company allotted in installments, it is possible to pass the security transfer of the IPR to the refinancing institution.

          This approach will become challenging if there is not only one but a number of refinancing investors which all demand the transfer of IP rights. As stated above IP rights cannot be divided in general.

          IV. SPV as a Finance Model

          In case a customer needs not only one but several investors to finance a loan on the new IP the customer faces the dilemma that it can neither split up the undividable IP right nor can it hand over the complete IP.

          The challenge is to make the undividable right dividable. This can be achieved by setting up an entity (e.g. a Chinese limited company) to which the IP rights are being transferred. Such entities are also known as Special Purpose vehicles (SPV). As a next step the inventing company can transfer share of that new company to investors as the required security.

          The main purpose of such an entity is the simultaneously assignment of the stakes in the IP of the inventing company to secure the according investors. If required, is the ownership in the concerned IP right is forwarded to the inventing company, as the investor in the forfeiting remain liable for the inventory risk of the claim and the customer also the financing institution as a first contact understands.

          V. Outlook

          The creation and therefore the protection of IP rights is one of the challenges of the 21st Century. Setting up a framework that allows inventing companies' access to investors and giving investors the possibility to secure their investment is a crucial keystone to achieve this challenge.

          Financial institutions as well as refinancing to microfinance institutions require comprehensive safeguards (also known as hedging) to secure their investment into IP rights. Currently complex refinancing structures, such as SPV's are required to secure investments. Next to securing investments an SPV structure will provide a number of interesting side-effects.

          It is possible to reduce a potential liability risk of the inventing company to a wide extent. The exact extent of the remaining liability will depend on the chosen entity which is chosen for the SPV (e.g. plc, limited or other). Furthermore, an SPV model might be interesting from a tax point of view. An SPV can also be setup as asset-backed securities (in short as ABS). An ABS opens a refinancing institution the opportunity to link such an investment with other financial products (e.g. with high risk bond) in an corresponding portfolio.



          The J-Innovation

          Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

          Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

          Washable keyboard

          The future of China & WTO

          JETRO: A decade of development in China

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲中文字幕久久精品品| 精品国产91久久综合| 欧美videosdesexo肥婆| 久99久热免费视频播放| 亚洲一区二区三区啪啪| 野花在线观看免费观看高清| 色一情一乱一伦视频| 亚洲高清免费在线观看| 久久夜色精品久久噜噜亚| 精品无码一区在线观看| av无码电影在线看免费| 日韩亚洲中文图片小说| 国产区精品福利在线熟女| 亚洲精品国产免费av| 国产精品免费中文字幕| 性男女做视频观看网站| 国产精品熟女一区二区三区| 免费看欧美全黄成人片| 国产精品亚洲综合久久小说| 另类欧美日韩| 国产片av在线观看国语| 男人添女人下部高潮视频| 人妻少妇不满足中文字幕| 激情文学一区二区国产区| 亚洲精品一二三中文字幕| 四虎国产精品免费久久久| 日本a在线播放| 亚洲国产精品热久久| 国产精品视频午夜福利| 亚洲成av人片乱码色午夜| 网友自拍人妻一区二区三区三州| 色猫咪av在线网址| 精品日本乱一区二区三区| 樱桃熟了a级毛片| 亚洲精品天天影视综合网| 国产精品久久久久久福利| 99国精品午夜福利视频不卡99| 影视先锋av资源噜噜| 亚洲一区二区经典在线播放| 美女爽到高潮嗷嗷嗷叫免费网站| 亚洲国产精品一区二区视频|