<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
          (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-12-21

           Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

          Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

          WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

          The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

          "HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

          The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

          While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

          "The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

          The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

          Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

          Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

          The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

          HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

          HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

          The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

          HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

          Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

          Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

          Bloomberg News

          (China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



          Preventing a patent authorization

          Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

          The protection of design on printed flat works

          How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

          Can an expired patent be applied again?

          What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~的视频| 青青草无码免费一二三区| 国产成人亚洲精品在线看| 国产日产亚洲系列av| 国产乱码精品一区二区三| 精品无人乱码一区二区三区| 福利无遮挡喷水高潮| 一本av高清一区二区三区| 女人毛片女人毛片高清| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜不卡| 最近中文字幕完整版2019| 91人妻熟妇在线视频| 天天做天天爱夜夜爽导航| 偷青青国产精品青青在线观看| 国产中文三级全黄| 欧美日韩国产高清视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区我不卡| 熟妇人妻久久春色视频网| 精品熟女少妇av免费久久| 国产精品亚洲片夜色在线| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天bl| 国产一卡2卡三卡4卡免费网站| chinese熟女老女人hd视频 | 久久国产福利国产秒拍| 91中文字幕在线一区| japanese熟女熟妇| 日韩精品亚洲不卡一区二区 | 99在线视频免费观看| 欧美丰满妇大ass| 亚洲区1区3区4区中文字幕码| 99久久无色码中文字幕| 日产精品久久久久久久蜜臀 | 中文字幕亚洲无线码一区女同| 激情内射亚州一区二区三区爱妻| 亚洲av无码精品蜜桃| 国产精品成人国产乱| 国产午夜福利在线视频| 亚洲人成色99999在线观看| 377P欧洲日本亚洲大胆| 久久亚洲精品国产精品| 国产老熟女无套内射不卡|