<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
          (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-12-21

           Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

          Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

          WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

          The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

          "HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

          The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

          While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

          "The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

          The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

          Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

          Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

          The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

          HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

          HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

          The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

          HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

          Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

          Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

          Bloomberg News

          (China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



          Preventing a patent authorization

          Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

          The protection of design on printed flat works

          How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

          Can an expired patent be applied again?

          What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品无码人妻一区二区三区品 | 国产精品久久久久影院色| 欧美伦费免费全部午夜最新| 亚洲精品白浆高清久久| 精品人妻少妇嫩草av系列| free性开放小少妇| 99精品人妻少妇一区| 无码视频伊人| 国产人妻无码一区二区三区免费 | 国产精品午夜福利导航导| 中国少妇嫖妓BBWBBW| 亚洲av永久中文在线| 日本高清一区免费中文视频| 伊人精品无码AV一区二区三区| 777奇米四色成人影视色区| 波多野结衣中文字幕久久| 婷婷丁香五月深爱憿情网| 和艳妇在厨房好爽在线观看 | 人妻激情偷一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区女优丝袜| 欧美亚洲一区二区三区在线| 国内精品国产三级国产a久久| 天天操天天噜| 免费A级毛片中文字幕| 国产午夜精品一二区理论影院| 高h喷水荡肉爽文1v1| 熟女在线视频一区二区三区| 国产精品店无码一区二区三区| 亚洲av综合aⅴ国产av中文| 欧洲精品色在线观看| 国产亚洲精品资源在线26u| 国产精品区一区第一页| 天天看片天天av免费观看| 小伙无套内射老熟女精品| 欧美综合中文字幕久久| 久久综合老鸭窝色综合久久| 在线a人片免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在小说| 久久国产精品夜色| 成人亚欧欧美激情在线观看| 久久天天躁夜夜躁一区|