<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees
          By Wang Xin (China Daily)
          Updated: 2014-03-26

          To end a monopoly investigation against it in China, US wireless technology giant InterDigital Communications has pledged to license use of its patents in "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms", local media reports.

          IDC also pledged to withdraw intellectual property complaints with the US International Trade Commission against Chinese telecommunication makers Huawei Technology and ZTE, both headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong province.

          The anti-monopoly investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission started last June, Xu Kunlin, an official of the commission, said at a press conference in Beijing in February.

          The key issue is whether the US technological powerhouse has abused its dominant position in the market to charge higher prices in China, Xu said.

          Han Liang, a partner at the law firm Freshfields Brckhaus Deringer LLP, told the business news portal caijing.com.cn that the complex case combines anti-monopoly and intellectual property issues as well as competition and innovation.

          When doing business in telecommunications, companies cannot get around IDC, industry observers said.

          The conglomerate has an enormous patent portfolio of more than 19,500 technologies related to wireless communications, many of them crucial for the industry's technological standards.

          Its annual report shows that it makes its profit mainly from patent licensing rather than direct production.

          It has licensed some 40 wireless device manufacturers to use its patents, which are necessary to meet industry standards. Its clients include well-known cellphone brands Apple, Samsung and HTC.

          After many rounds of negotiations since late 2008, IDC and Huawei failed to reach an agreement on licensing fees.

          Huawei refused to accept IDC's proposal because it is 19 times the rate for Apple and more than twice that for Samsung, according to local media.

          IDC filed complaints against the Chinese company with the ITC and in a Delaware court in 2011, claiming Huawei infringed on seven of its patents.

          The trade commission announced a preliminary ruling in June, 2013 that said one of the patents is invalid and Huawei did not violate rights to the other six.

          Huawei filed an anti-monopoly complaint against IDC with a Shenzhen court at the end of 2011 and won the case.

          Judges found it legitimate for the case to be heard in China as Huawei is based in the country and "IDC's monopoly in the US and patent authorization could directly affect Huawei's production in China as well as its exports", the Xinhua news agency reported.

          The court found patent licensing rates offered by IDC to Huawei are much higher than for other companies, said Xinhua.

          The Guangdong provincial high court upheld the verdict by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and ordered IDC to pay 20 million yuan ($3.26 million) in compensation for monopolistic practices.

          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees

          The ruling was met with wide acclaim among domestic critics.

          "The purpose of intellectual property protection is to advance innovation and promote competition," said Wang Xiaoye, a researcher on law at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          "Rights owners should be punished in accordance with the anti-monopoly law in the case of abusive use of their IP rights resulting in exclusion, restriction and distortion of the market competition," she said.

          Yang Lixin, a law professor at Renmin University of China, said that the key to Huawei's court victory was that the company has developed the will and expertise to use the rules for protecting itself in international IP competition.

          Zhang Ping, a law professor at Peking University, said the landmark ruling gave a clear definition of the FRAND principle - fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory - which will have far-reaching influence in China and abroad.

          Yet William Perry, a partner at US law firm Dorsey American who worked with ITC before, expressed his concerns to Caijing business magazine.

          He said the Chinese government goes all out to encourage local innovation and has a strong desire to help homegrown high-tech companies rid themselves of reliance on overseas patents.

          The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology projects that investment in the telecommunication industry will surpass 350 billion yuan this year, 100 billion yuan of it in construction on a 4G mobile communications network.

          wangxin@chinadaily.com.cn

          (China Daily 03/26/2014 page17)



          The J-Innovation

          Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

          Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

          Washable keyboard

          The future of China & WTO

          JETRO: A decade of development in China

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 强奷乱码中文字幕| 国产成人亚洲欧美日韩| 好男人日本社区www| 成人网站国产在线视频内射视频 | 九九热视频精品在线播放| 性做久久久久久久| 欧美做受视频播放| 爱啪啪av导航| 欧美做受视频播放| 无码毛片一区二区本码视频| 性xxxx视频播放| 男女性高爱潮免费网站| а天堂8中文最新版在线官网| 少妇尿尿一区二区在线免费| 国精品91人妻无码一区二区三区| 国产内射性高湖| 99在线精品免费视频九九视| 成人午夜电影福利免费| 欧美精品一区二区在线观看播放 | 玩弄放荡人妻少妇系列| 成 人免费va视频| 亚洲美女视频一区| 国产亚洲精品AA片在线播放天| 久久免费精品国产72精品| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇高清| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片dvd| 精品亚洲男人一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美在线人成app| 日韩精品一区二区三区色| 亚洲精品日本久久一区二区三区| 成人精品视频在线观看播放| 成人做受120秒试看试看视频| 亚洲产在线精品亚洲第一站一| 美女禁区a级全片免费观看| 久久久精品免费国产四虎| 亚洲精品日韩在线丰满| 国产中文欧美日韩在线| 亚洲欧洲一区二区福利片| 一本大道无码日韩精品影视| 一区二区三区四区五区黄色| 少妇人妻偷人精品免费|