<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees
          By Wang Xin (China Daily)
          Updated: 2014-03-26

          To end a monopoly investigation against it in China, US wireless technology giant InterDigital Communications has pledged to license use of its patents in "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms", local media reports.

          IDC also pledged to withdraw intellectual property complaints with the US International Trade Commission against Chinese telecommunication makers Huawei Technology and ZTE, both headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong province.

          The anti-monopoly investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission started last June, Xu Kunlin, an official of the commission, said at a press conference in Beijing in February.

          The key issue is whether the US technological powerhouse has abused its dominant position in the market to charge higher prices in China, Xu said.

          Han Liang, a partner at the law firm Freshfields Brckhaus Deringer LLP, told the business news portal caijing.com.cn that the complex case combines anti-monopoly and intellectual property issues as well as competition and innovation.

          When doing business in telecommunications, companies cannot get around IDC, industry observers said.

          The conglomerate has an enormous patent portfolio of more than 19,500 technologies related to wireless communications, many of them crucial for the industry's technological standards.

          Its annual report shows that it makes its profit mainly from patent licensing rather than direct production.

          It has licensed some 40 wireless device manufacturers to use its patents, which are necessary to meet industry standards. Its clients include well-known cellphone brands Apple, Samsung and HTC.

          After many rounds of negotiations since late 2008, IDC and Huawei failed to reach an agreement on licensing fees.

          Huawei refused to accept IDC's proposal because it is 19 times the rate for Apple and more than twice that for Samsung, according to local media.

          IDC filed complaints against the Chinese company with the ITC and in a Delaware court in 2011, claiming Huawei infringed on seven of its patents.

          The trade commission announced a preliminary ruling in June, 2013 that said one of the patents is invalid and Huawei did not violate rights to the other six.

          Huawei filed an anti-monopoly complaint against IDC with a Shenzhen court at the end of 2011 and won the case.

          Judges found it legitimate for the case to be heard in China as Huawei is based in the country and "IDC's monopoly in the US and patent authorization could directly affect Huawei's production in China as well as its exports", the Xinhua news agency reported.

          The court found patent licensing rates offered by IDC to Huawei are much higher than for other companies, said Xinhua.

          The Guangdong provincial high court upheld the verdict by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and ordered IDC to pay 20 million yuan ($3.26 million) in compensation for monopolistic practices.

          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees

          The ruling was met with wide acclaim among domestic critics.

          "The purpose of intellectual property protection is to advance innovation and promote competition," said Wang Xiaoye, a researcher on law at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          "Rights owners should be punished in accordance with the anti-monopoly law in the case of abusive use of their IP rights resulting in exclusion, restriction and distortion of the market competition," she said.

          Yang Lixin, a law professor at Renmin University of China, said that the key to Huawei's court victory was that the company has developed the will and expertise to use the rules for protecting itself in international IP competition.

          Zhang Ping, a law professor at Peking University, said the landmark ruling gave a clear definition of the FRAND principle - fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory - which will have far-reaching influence in China and abroad.

          Yet William Perry, a partner at US law firm Dorsey American who worked with ITC before, expressed his concerns to Caijing business magazine.

          He said the Chinese government goes all out to encourage local innovation and has a strong desire to help homegrown high-tech companies rid themselves of reliance on overseas patents.

          The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology projects that investment in the telecommunication industry will surpass 350 billion yuan this year, 100 billion yuan of it in construction on a 4G mobile communications network.

          wangxin@chinadaily.com.cn

          (China Daily 03/26/2014 page17)



          The J-Innovation

          Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

          Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

          Washable keyboard

          The future of China & WTO

          JETRO: A decade of development in China

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 18禁成年免费无码国产| 女人扒开屁股桶爽30分钟高潮| 一区二区中文字幕视频| 免费看欧美全黄成人片| 欧美精品1区2区| 亚洲AV无码专区在线播放中文| 日本乱一区二区三区在线| 91久久偷偷做嫩草影院免费看| 国产男生午夜福利免费网站| 无码人妻斩一区二区三区| 少妇爽到呻吟的视频| 亚洲色欲在线播放一区二区三区| 波多野结衣无内裤护士| 日日碰狠狠躁久久躁96avv| 久久婷婷综合色丁香五月| 久久精品第九区免费观看| 99久久精品美女高潮喷水| 久久精品国产高潮国产夫妻| 亚洲色婷婷婷婷五月基地| 国内精品一区二区不卡| 精品国产免费人成在线观看 | 日本高清在线播放一区二区三区| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮虎虎视频 | 国产一区二区内射最近更新| 日韩欧美卡一卡二卡新区| 亚洲偷自拍国综合| 国产高清午夜人成在线观看,| 激情综合色综合久久综合| 又大又粗欧美成人网站| 中文字幕丰满乱子无码视频| 亚洲精品成人区在线观看| 日韩激情无码av一区二区| 老司机精品影院一区二区三区| 成人无码视频在线观看免费播放| 日韩av一区免费播放| 日本夜爽爽一区二区三区| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 国产成人综合在线观看不卡| 亚洲国产精品自产在线播放| 国产精品二区中文字幕| 亚洲精品动漫一区二区三|