<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          China / View

          Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

          By Harvey Morris (China Daily) Updated: 2017-02-05 14:54

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system - people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Highlights
          Hot Topics

          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 天堂最新版在线| 韩国午夜理伦三级| 成本人片无码中文字幕免费| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽五月婷| 国产美女在线精品亚洲二区| 国产一区二区三区国产视频| 熟女一区| 亚洲欧美激情在线一区| 久久综合亚洲鲁鲁九月天| 久久无码中文字幕免费影院| 国产偷窥熟女高潮精品视频| 亚洲AV无码国产精品夜色午夜 | 久久国产精品二国产人妻| 漂亮人妻被修理工侵犯| 日韩在线视频线观看一区| 国产99在线 | 免费| 一区二区精品| 最近中文字幕国产精选| 无码国产精品久久一区免费| 新久久国产色av免费看| 欧美老少配性行为| 欧美日韩国产综合草草| 亚洲 制服 丝袜 无码| 国产成人无码AV片在线观看不卡 | 精品国偷自产在线视频99| 老司机精品福利在线资源| 国偷自产一区二区三区在线视频| 超碰伊人久久大香线蕉综合| 精品免费看国产一区二区| 亚洲va欧美va国产综合| 国产精品天天看天天狠| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片dvd| 日本视频一区二区三区1| 99久久精品久久久久久婷婷| 国产一级精品在线免费看| 久久久久国产精品麻豆ar影院| 成人激情视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日本一区二区| 日韩区中文字幕在线观看| 99国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 高级艳妇交换俱乐部小说|