<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          OPINION> Li Xing
          Let's dissect the media for a change
          By Li Xing (China Daily)
          Updated: 2009-10-22 07:48

          My friend Xu Haoyuan sent me two emails within a month about problems she encountered in news media coverage. Each illustrates how far some journalists nowadays have strayed from accuracy and truthfulness.

          Xu manages the Beijing-based Heart-to-Heart Center for Behavioral Science to promote public psychological health. In her first email, she talked about the loopholes the reporter left in an article published in a leading weekly news magazine in China. The article, based on an interview with her, narrated her experiences during the "cultural revolution" (1966-76).

          In addition to getting two people's names wrong, the reporter misinterpreted her impressions of the United States, Xu said. She made the accusations not only in her email to me and other friends, but also in her blog.

          The reporter wrote that Xu "went to further her studies in the United States, the country that touts the Glory and the Dream. There, she experienced democracy which was different from collectivism"

          The truth is, Xu said she became "very disappointed with the hypocritical 'democracy' in the US", and that she made her disappointment crystal clear upon her return to China.

          Xu has the right to be furious and to question why a young reporter not only misquoted her, but put words in her mouth, too. Through her blog, she has notified the public about the errors in the article.

          The second email, which she forwarded to me on Monday, was first sent out last Thursday by a renowned professor of political science at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. It contained a copy of a news analysis about this year's Nobel Prize for Economics, which was published in a leading Beijing-based business and economics newspaper.

          The author quoted two Chinese academics, one of who was the Chinese University professor, in his analysis of how Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom's research inspired Chinese economists to find solutions to a plethora of problems China faces in development. The author claimed that the quotes came from recent interviews, but this professor said in his email that he'd never given an interview.

          Sadly, these are not isolated cases. There is no single root cause for media inaccuracies. Instead, it's a confluence of factors.

          First, China's dramatic economic growth has transformed it so much that it is difficult for young reporters to understand events that took place before they were born. Although traditional journalism teaches aspiring young reporters to never take things for granted or make assumptions, some still do, thus making up their own interpretations without checking the facts.

          Second, as competition among the traditional and the new media becomes fiercer, some in the traditional media are giving up their long-held practice of checking the facts.

          As they cut budgets and rush to keep up with the Internet, many media organizations cannot afford the manpower or the time to check facts. Some media organizations just keep their reporters in the office by their phones and computers where they can use the Internet. They don't encourage them to go to obtain the information first-hand on a story.

          Above all, on the Internet, any private citizen can now report or blog about "news". When a young man went online and slandered his former girl friend, saying she was suffering from AIDS and sleeping with numerous men, quite a few Internet portals reported this as news in order to draw more hits or wider citation. Here accuracy and truthfulness are simply trampled.

          There is no simple solution for eliminating media inaccuracies and false reports. Even when we tighten ethical reviews among journalists in certified media outlets, there will still be millions of bloggers and self-appointed journalists on the Internet.

          The best society can do is to call on the people in the know to help correct the inaccuracies while raising public awareness of the journalistic code of conduct that makes it illegal to libel, slander or spread falsehood.

          lixing@chinadaily.com.cn

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产熟女av一区二区三区| 国产精品分类视频分类一区| 亚洲一区在线观看青青蜜臀| 久久精产国品一二三产品| 免费特黄夫妻生活片| 狠狠五月深爱婷婷网| 亚洲国产成人无码网站 | 久久精品国产亚洲精品| 脱了老师内裤猛烈进入的软件| 97国内精品久久久久不卡| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃 | 亚洲第一无码专区天堂| 波多野结衣久久一区二区| 久久伊人精品影院一本到综合| 国产精品人人妻人人爽| 亚洲最大成人av在线天堂网 | 亚洲精品国产av成拍色拍个 | 亚洲AV无码不卡在线播放| 99热成人精品热久久66| 女女互揉吃奶揉到高潮视频 | 国产三级精品在线免费| 成人精品老熟妇一区二区| 国产太嫩了在线观看| 免费人成年激情视频在线观看| 激,情四虎欧美视频图片| 日韩中文字幕免费在线观看| 最新亚洲人成网站在线影院| 亚洲国产中文综合专区在| 亚洲国产精品综合久久20| 免费看国产成人无码a片| 九九热视频在线精品18| 国产理论精品| 国内精品人妻一区二区三区| 中文国产日韩欧美二视频| 四虎永久免费很黄的视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩高清| 国产成人午夜精品影院| 九九热在线免费播放视频| 999精品全免费观看视频| 人妻中文字幕精品系列| 在线看国产精品自拍内射|