<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          OPINION> Li Xing
          Let's dissect the media for a change
          By Li Xing (China Daily)
          Updated: 2009-10-22 07:48

          My friend Xu Haoyuan sent me two emails within a month about problems she encountered in news media coverage. Each illustrates how far some journalists nowadays have strayed from accuracy and truthfulness.

          Xu manages the Beijing-based Heart-to-Heart Center for Behavioral Science to promote public psychological health. In her first email, she talked about the loopholes the reporter left in an article published in a leading weekly news magazine in China. The article, based on an interview with her, narrated her experiences during the "cultural revolution" (1966-76).

          In addition to getting two people's names wrong, the reporter misinterpreted her impressions of the United States, Xu said. She made the accusations not only in her email to me and other friends, but also in her blog.

          The reporter wrote that Xu "went to further her studies in the United States, the country that touts the Glory and the Dream. There, she experienced democracy which was different from collectivism"

          The truth is, Xu said she became "very disappointed with the hypocritical 'democracy' in the US", and that she made her disappointment crystal clear upon her return to China.

          Xu has the right to be furious and to question why a young reporter not only misquoted her, but put words in her mouth, too. Through her blog, she has notified the public about the errors in the article.

          The second email, which she forwarded to me on Monday, was first sent out last Thursday by a renowned professor of political science at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. It contained a copy of a news analysis about this year's Nobel Prize for Economics, which was published in a leading Beijing-based business and economics newspaper.

          The author quoted two Chinese academics, one of who was the Chinese University professor, in his analysis of how Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom's research inspired Chinese economists to find solutions to a plethora of problems China faces in development. The author claimed that the quotes came from recent interviews, but this professor said in his email that he'd never given an interview.

          Sadly, these are not isolated cases. There is no single root cause for media inaccuracies. Instead, it's a confluence of factors.

          First, China's dramatic economic growth has transformed it so much that it is difficult for young reporters to understand events that took place before they were born. Although traditional journalism teaches aspiring young reporters to never take things for granted or make assumptions, some still do, thus making up their own interpretations without checking the facts.

          Second, as competition among the traditional and the new media becomes fiercer, some in the traditional media are giving up their long-held practice of checking the facts.

          As they cut budgets and rush to keep up with the Internet, many media organizations cannot afford the manpower or the time to check facts. Some media organizations just keep their reporters in the office by their phones and computers where they can use the Internet. They don't encourage them to go to obtain the information first-hand on a story.

          Above all, on the Internet, any private citizen can now report or blog about "news". When a young man went online and slandered his former girl friend, saying she was suffering from AIDS and sleeping with numerous men, quite a few Internet portals reported this as news in order to draw more hits or wider citation. Here accuracy and truthfulness are simply trampled.

          There is no simple solution for eliminating media inaccuracies and false reports. Even when we tighten ethical reviews among journalists in certified media outlets, there will still be millions of bloggers and self-appointed journalists on the Internet.

          The best society can do is to call on the people in the know to help correct the inaccuracies while raising public awareness of the journalistic code of conduct that makes it illegal to libel, slander or spread falsehood.

          lixing@chinadaily.com.cn

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人国产av精品免费网| 免费99视频| 国产精品普通话国语对白露脸| 麻豆国产成人av在线播放欲色| 极品一区二区三区水蜜桃| аⅴ天堂国产最新版在线中文| 精品国产成人网站一区在线| 亚洲精品欧美综合二区| 亚洲成av人无码免费观看| 西西大胆午夜人体视频| 久草国产手机视频在线观看| 东方av四虎在线观看| 亚洲色在线无码国产精品| 亚洲女人的天堂在线观看| 一二三四中文字幕日韩乱码| 亚洲色大成网站www永久男同| 亚洲无码a∨在线视频| 日本久久久www成人免费毛片丨 | 亚洲日本国产精品一区| 亚洲丰满熟女一区二区蜜桃| 日韩成人一区二区三区在线观看 | av天堂亚洲区无码先锋影音 | 另类国产精品一区二区| 成人午夜天| 精品免费看国产一区二区| 久久久国产精品无码一区二区| 制服丝袜美腿一区二区| 国产乱子伦一区二区三区四区五区| 四虎永久免费高清视频| 老湿机香蕉久久久久久| 熟妇人妻久久精品一区二区| 四虎永久在线精品免费视频观看 | 偷偷做久久久久免费网站| 日韩一区二区三区女优丝袜| 欧美成人aaa片一区国产精品 | 好男人社区影视在线WWW| 国产自在自线午夜精品视频| 亚洲WWW永久成人网站| 日本成熟老妇乱| 亚洲天堂av日韩精品| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕网址|