<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          OP Rana

          GM-tech running agriculture to seed

          By Op Rana (China Daily)
          Updated: 2010-03-19 06:45
          Large Medium Small

          To eat GM food, or not to eat: that is the question in China after the Ministry of Agriculture allowed field trials with genetically modified rice seeds. The experts' world is divided.

          GM seed supporters argue the world's hungry cannot be fed if agriculture doesn't change its traditional ways (read: if farmers do not use GM seeds). They say if the opponents can accept Bt cotton and genetically engineered medicine, why cannot they accept GM rice.

          Let's take China and India, where Bt cotton is grown widely, as examples. GM seeds were introduced in these countries as high-yielding varieties. Very few, if any, farmers were told at the outset that they would have no choice but to keep paying exponentially more to buy them season after season. The Western world, which claims to have gifted the magic seed to the poor, is obsessed with democracy. But after using GM seeds does a farmer have the democracy of choice to revert to conventional seeds? To be honest, he has - but the soil, contaminated by GM seeds, would at best yield a poor harvest.

          Thousands of farmers have committed suicide in India because their GM crops failed. They could not repay the loans they had taken from banks and/or moneylenders to buy GM seeds. The lure of GM seeds is still pushing hundreds of thousands of others under insurmountable debts. But they are not part of the West's democracy program.

          Earlier this month came a confession from Monsanto, the world's biggest GM seed-maker, that pink bollworms insects had developed resistance to its Bt cotton crop in India's western province of Gujarat.

          So what do the farmers do? Monsanto advocates they graduate to using its second-generation product called "Bollgard II which has greater ability (and costs more) to delay resistance". In other words, it is admitting the failure of Bt technology. So democracy means continuing to buy "higher quality" products from the same company and paying more year after year.

          Suppose the farmers do buy Bollgard II, is there any guarantee that it would not fail in another few years?

          But still the champions of GM seeds want to introduce Bt eggplants in India because it will increase the yield of the vegetable. They have had to back off for now because of public protests, but given India's democratic record they could always return successfully, and one cannot say whether secret trials have already been held with Bt eggplant seeds.

          That brings us back to the trial of GM rice seeds in China. It's true that China was the first to grow hybrid varieties of rice. It's also true that hybrid seeds raised output and helped feed millions of more people. India used it, too, with the same results. But hybrid seeds are not, as they are touted to be, the same as GM seeds that multinationals are trying to push down farmers' throats today.

          It is surprising that the main targets of GM seed companies are developing countries. Is it because people in the Western world, which engendered GM seeds, are also its greatest opponents? Why do GM seed companies find few takers in the developed world? Why is the European Union still skeptical about GM food? Why do GM companies respect democracy of choice in the developed world and not in developing countries?

          Why doesn't an independent study on the harmful effects of GM seeds in China or India carry the same weight as that done by America's Pesticide Action Network (PAN)? Recently, PAN joined hundreds of farmers in Ankeny, Iowa, to "testify to the devastating effects of corporate control over food and agriculture".

          PAN presented evidence "from the most comprehensive analysis of global agriculture to date, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science & Technology", which said GM seeds and industrial-scale farming are unlikely to feed the world; GM technologies have consistently benefited corporations, not the world's hungry; and sustainable agriculture that works for people and the planet requires breaking up corporate monopolies in agriculture.

          Let's accept it. GM seeds, in the control of multinational companies, are not science but pure commerce. They are not being promoted to feed the world's hungry, but to make money. These companies have spent billions of dollars to genetically modify the seeds. Now, they are forcing poor farmers to pay them back with a very high rate of interest. Whither democracy?

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲亚洲中文字幕无线码| 老司机导航亚洲精品导航| 国产精品亚洲аv无码播放| 久热综合在线亚洲精品| 高清性欧美暴力猛交| 四虎精品国产AV二区| 亚洲日韩国产二区无码| 麻豆亚州无矿码专区视频| AV极品无码专区亚洲AV| 亚州AV无码乱码精品国产| 中文无码乱人伦中文视频在线| 内射极品少妇xxxxxhd| 漂亮的保姆hd完整版免费韩国| 亚洲精品动漫免费二区| 亚洲日产韩国一二三四区| 毛片大全真人在线| 熟妇人妻久久春色视频网| 日本一区二区不卡精品| 永久免费无码国产| 2021国产成人精品久久 | 国产精品无码久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区国产综合| 免费 黄 色 人成 视频 在 线| 污污污污污污WWW网站免费| 日本视频高清一道一区| 黄色三级亚洲男人的天堂| 亚洲午夜爱爱香蕉片| 精品人妻一区二区三区蜜臀| 亚洲色偷偷偷综合网| 亚洲自在精品网久久一区| 久热这里只有精品在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区第一页| 香蕉乱码成人久久天堂爱| 人妻熟女一区二区aⅴ水野朝阳 | 国产一区二区不卡在线| 国内a级毛片| 中文字幕乱码一区二区免费| 欧美另类精品一区二区三区| 日韩在线观看精品亚洲| 国精产品一品二品国精破解| 99午夜精品亚洲一区二区|