<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          OP Rana

          GM-tech running agriculture to seed

          By Op Rana (China Daily)
          Updated: 2010-03-19 06:45
          Large Medium Small

          To eat GM food, or not to eat: that is the question in China after the Ministry of Agriculture allowed field trials with genetically modified rice seeds. The experts' world is divided.

          GM seed supporters argue the world's hungry cannot be fed if agriculture doesn't change its traditional ways (read: if farmers do not use GM seeds). They say if the opponents can accept Bt cotton and genetically engineered medicine, why cannot they accept GM rice.

          Let's take China and India, where Bt cotton is grown widely, as examples. GM seeds were introduced in these countries as high-yielding varieties. Very few, if any, farmers were told at the outset that they would have no choice but to keep paying exponentially more to buy them season after season. The Western world, which claims to have gifted the magic seed to the poor, is obsessed with democracy. But after using GM seeds does a farmer have the democracy of choice to revert to conventional seeds? To be honest, he has - but the soil, contaminated by GM seeds, would at best yield a poor harvest.

          Thousands of farmers have committed suicide in India because their GM crops failed. They could not repay the loans they had taken from banks and/or moneylenders to buy GM seeds. The lure of GM seeds is still pushing hundreds of thousands of others under insurmountable debts. But they are not part of the West's democracy program.

          Earlier this month came a confession from Monsanto, the world's biggest GM seed-maker, that pink bollworms insects had developed resistance to its Bt cotton crop in India's western province of Gujarat.

          So what do the farmers do? Monsanto advocates they graduate to using its second-generation product called "Bollgard II which has greater ability (and costs more) to delay resistance". In other words, it is admitting the failure of Bt technology. So democracy means continuing to buy "higher quality" products from the same company and paying more year after year.

          Suppose the farmers do buy Bollgard II, is there any guarantee that it would not fail in another few years?

          But still the champions of GM seeds want to introduce Bt eggplants in India because it will increase the yield of the vegetable. They have had to back off for now because of public protests, but given India's democratic record they could always return successfully, and one cannot say whether secret trials have already been held with Bt eggplant seeds.

          That brings us back to the trial of GM rice seeds in China. It's true that China was the first to grow hybrid varieties of rice. It's also true that hybrid seeds raised output and helped feed millions of more people. India used it, too, with the same results. But hybrid seeds are not, as they are touted to be, the same as GM seeds that multinationals are trying to push down farmers' throats today.

          It is surprising that the main targets of GM seed companies are developing countries. Is it because people in the Western world, which engendered GM seeds, are also its greatest opponents? Why do GM seed companies find few takers in the developed world? Why is the European Union still skeptical about GM food? Why do GM companies respect democracy of choice in the developed world and not in developing countries?

          Why doesn't an independent study on the harmful effects of GM seeds in China or India carry the same weight as that done by America's Pesticide Action Network (PAN)? Recently, PAN joined hundreds of farmers in Ankeny, Iowa, to "testify to the devastating effects of corporate control over food and agriculture".

          PAN presented evidence "from the most comprehensive analysis of global agriculture to date, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science & Technology", which said GM seeds and industrial-scale farming are unlikely to feed the world; GM technologies have consistently benefited corporations, not the world's hungry; and sustainable agriculture that works for people and the planet requires breaking up corporate monopolies in agriculture.

          Let's accept it. GM seeds, in the control of multinational companies, are not science but pure commerce. They are not being promoted to feed the world's hungry, but to make money. These companies have spent billions of dollars to genetically modify the seeds. Now, they are forcing poor farmers to pay them back with a very high rate of interest. Whither democracy?

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一级人片内射视频播放| 国产精品爱久久久久久久| 91福利国产在线观一区二区| 色悠悠国产精品免费观看| 白丝美女办公室高潮喷水视频 | 中文字幕av国产精品| 精品久久久久久中文字幕女| 午夜福利免费区在线观看| 午夜色无码大片在线观看免费| 黑人巨大精品oideo| 97久久超碰亚洲视觉盛宴| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中文| 国产suv精品一区二区四| 黄色三级视频中文字幕| 亚洲一区精品伊人久久| 老司机亚洲精品一区二区| 亚洲精品一区二区三区大| 孕妇特级毛片ww无码内射| 亚洲国产成人综合熟女| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 中文字幕日韩精品国产| 色伦专区97中文字幕| 国产AV午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一码在线播放| 亚洲人成电影网站色mp4| 亚洲精品天堂无码中文字幕| 国产精品自拍实拍在线看| 国内少妇毛片视频| 国产蜜臀精品一区二区三区| 99精品国产精品一区二区| 麻豆国产成人AV在线播放| 日韩精品中文字幕有码| 亚洲第一无码专区天堂| 和艳妇在厨房好爽在线观看| 亚洲精品国产老熟女久久| 久久夜色撩人国产综合av| 成人精品区| 色综合中文字幕色综合激情| 欧美日本精品一本二本三区| 久久亚洲女同第一区综合| 亚洲国产午夜精品理论片|