Op-Ed Contributors

May Koreans live in peace

By Wang Sheng (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-12-21 08:05

In early December, the Chinese government proposed emergency consultations among the heads of delegation to the Six-Party Talks. The constructive proposal played an important role in easing tensions.

But instead of accepting Beijing's proposal, the meeting of the foreign ministers of the ROK and Japan and the US secretary of state in Washington on Dec 6 condemned the DPRK and asked China to join them in dealing with issues relating to the Korean Peninsula.

On Dec 6, President Hu Jintao reportedly told US President Barack Obama over the telephone: "We need to ease (tension), not heighten it dialogue, not confrontation peace, not war."

Thanks to China's efforts, the official DPRK newspaper, Rodong Sinmun, said in a commentary on Dec 7 that Pyongyang and Seoul should settle all mutual issues to improve their relations and achieve reunification through dialogue and negotiations. This was Pyongyang's "sign of peace" to the whole world.

But lately the DPRK had warned of a "catastrophe" if the ROK went ahead with the live-fire drills from Yeonpyeong.

In a way, Pyongyang's "super tough" stance against Seoul's "toughness" is to draw Washington's attention and increase its bargaining chips, and not to fight a war with the ROK.

The recent developments on the peninsula have made it all the more important to resume the Six-Party Talks. Military deterrence can only deteriorate the situation, even lead to a war. Dialogue and negotiations are the only way to solve the issues and restore peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.

The main responsibility of settling the Korean Peninsula issue, therefore, lies with the US rather than China. China, no doubt, is an important part of the process, and has scrupulously followed the principle of peaceful coexistence and non-interference in other countries' internal affairs.

In fact, even if China were to follow the examples of the US, the ROK and Japan and take a tough stance against the DPRK, it cannot compel Pyongyang to give in to the three countries' demands. On the contrary, such a shift in China's stance could harm regional peace and stability.

If China had not played a pacifying role, tensions on the peninsula could have escalated further.

After the armistice agreement ended the Korean War (1950-1953), no channel of direct dialogue exists between the two sides.

So an important task now is to transform the armistice agreement into a peace pact as soon as possible, a process in which the US has a vital role to play, for it is one of the parties that concluded the agreement. A peace pact between the DPRK and the ROK will play an important role in restoring peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.

The author is a professor of international studies at Jilin University.

(China Daily 12/21/2010 page9)