<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Public increases tax pressure on govt

          By Wu Yixue (China Daily) Updated: 2011-05-20 08:01

          The public has expressed a high degree of concern since a draft amendment to the Personal Income Tax Law was submitted to the National People's Congress.

          The amendment proposes the tax threshold be raised to 3,000 yuan a month ($460) from the current 2,000 yuan and the current nine brackets of the rating system be reduced to seven. On the first day of publication, the top legislature received more than 100,000 responses and had collected nearly 200,000 by May 8, which is the total number of responses it received for all the 20 law drafts made public since 2009.

          Related readings:
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Some suggestions for tax reform
          Public increases tax pressure on govt No consensus in debate over income-tax threshold
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Experts input on tax threshold changes
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Current tax rate is too high, Chinese say

          Many have complained that the tax threshold's 1,000-yuan rise is not enough and there are those who have been critical of the whole tax system. Some urban dwellers, especially those in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other large cities, published their living costs online on a variety of websites and forums, and these were much higher than the minimum living expenses calculated by relevant government departments.

          The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) recently offered some confusing statistics on the country's per capita housing expenses, an important part of people's living costs, and that has further undermined the NBS's long-controversial credibility and also increased people's doubts about how reasonable a tax threshold of 3,000 yuan is.

          Hua Sheng, a Beijing-based economist, is staunchly opposed to government moves to raise the minimum tax threshold by a large margin, citing this does no good to low-income earners, especially those with a monthly income below 2,000 yuan. He argues that the government should prioritize raising the incomes of this group rather than reducing taxes for higher-income people.

          Such a viewpoint has no solid foundation because it ignores the fact that any government moves to raise the incomes of low-income people do not contradict its efforts to reduce tax for middle-income residents. It is by no means an "either this or that" choice.

          However, to further raise the minimum tax threshold to 5,000 yuan or more, as some netizens have suggested, would cause a large loss of government fiscal revenue. Even increasing the tax threshold to 3,000 yuan will directly result in a decline of 90 billion yuan in government revenues, according to estimates by the taxation authorities.

          But the Chinese government is financially powerful enough to take steps toward reducing income tax. The central fiscal revenues have maintained a 20-30 percent growth year-on-year in recent years, much faster than the growth of people's per capita incomes. Reducing people's tax burdens appears particularly important and urgent when domestic demand has long remained too weak to drive national economic growth.

          In its 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015), the government is in a very good position to maintain a considerable growth in people's incomes and boost domestic demand. Together with the high CPI, these are enough to raise people's expectations of further tax relief.

          In an online chat on the Xinhuanet.com with netizens in February, Premier Wen Jiabao promised to raise the minimum threshold of personal income tax this year when responding to a taxi driver's complaint that the current 2,000-yuan tax threshold is too low.

          In fact, it is not a difficult decision if the government has hammered home the knowledge that its fiscal revenues are meant to serve the people and improve their livelihoods and welfare, rather than to pursue a growth in the State coffers. Public money should be used for the public. Reducing tax serves as the most direct way to achieve this.

          Public opinions on the disclosed draft to the Personal Income Tax Law continue to pour into the NPC. They are a crucial means for it to interact with the public and should be taken into consideration by the country's supreme power organ on the issue of tax reductions.

          The author is a writer with China Daily.

          (China Daily 05/20/2011 page8)

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          New type of urbanization is in the details
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品揄拍自拍首页一| 亚洲性色AV一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区影院| 色吊丝二区三区中文字幕| 亚洲Av午夜精品a区| 伊人色综合一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品熟女影院 | 国产日韩精品一区二区在线观看播放| 麻豆tv入口在线看| 亚洲国产初高中生女av| 欧美成人h精品网站| 好男人社区影视在线WWW| 男女啪啪无遮挡免费网站| 精品国产成人国产在线观看| 亚洲国产一区二区三区,| 亚洲一区二区精品偷拍| 99精品电影一区二区免费看| 九九热在线精品免费视频| 欧美色99| 亚洲国产成人不卡高清麻豆| 乱60一70归性欧老妇| 成在线人免费视频| 性色欲情网站iwww| 国产日韩精品一区在线不卡| 久久综合给合久久狠狠狠| av 日韩 人妻 黑人 综合 无码| 国产成人AV在线免播放观看新 | 九九热精品视频免费在线| 日韩精品一区二区av在线观看| 精品黄色av一区二区三区| 乱人伦人妻精品一区二区| 久久国产精品不只是精品| 亚洲精品成人7777在线观看 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩高清| 少妇夜夜春夜夜爽试看视频 | 元码人妻精品一区二区三区9 | 国产偷国产偷高清精品| 丰满少妇内射一区| 午夜在线不卡精品国产| 国产午夜精品福利91| ā片在线观看免费观看|