<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Domestic Affairs

          Don't blacklist, demand good reporting

          By Kim Bowden (chinadaily.com.cn)
          Updated: 2011-06-29 10:17
          Large Medium Small

          Exploding watermelons, phony eggs, rice made from plastic bags...Navigating supermarket aisles is risky business if you believe everything you read.

          China's Health Ministry has appointed itself supermarket security guard, announcing earlier this month its plan to blacklist journalists who mislead the public with phony-food stories.

          Over the passed three weeks the China Daily has encouraged online debate on the issue and as a young Western journalist I have been reading the comments with interest.

          A whopping 74 percent of respondents said they thought it was unreasonable for the Ministry to limit the freedom of the press to report on food-safety scandals. And thank goodness for that.

          With journalists often ranking alongside lawyers, politicians and used-car salesmen in the pits of public esteem, it was humbling to know these respondents, at least, thought we had a vital public service role to play.

          Amidst a seemingly never-ending series of stomach-turning and downright bizarre food-safety claims, consumers are desperate for information.

          "Basically, people now feel nothing is safe to eat," Sang Liwei, who directs the Beijing office of the Global Food Safety Forum, a private agency, told a New York Times reporter. "They don't know what choices to make. They are really feeling very helpless."

          Perhaps I am idealistic, journalism-school teachings are still fresh in my mind having graduated just last year, but I believe good journalism empowers people to make informed choices and holds the powers that be to account.

          It worries me that China's Health Ministry would try to curb this watch-dog role of the press in any way.

          But with this role comes responsibilities.

          As another China Daily contributor put it last week: "Newspapers and reporters are supposed to have a different set of values when it comes to the truth, the idea being that we supply critical thinking and verify the facts so readers can believe what is being said."

          In an increasingly commercial news culture, where better to be first and wrong rather than last and right is a common newsroom mantra and too many journalists fail to stray far from the press release turnaround treadmill, good investigative reporting often falls by the wayside.

          Science and consumer affairs reporting are especially difficult in this climate, and years of research and complex findings are often condensed into just a few simple paragraphs and a catchy headline.

          Misinformation can cause public panic and ruin an industry's credibility, and it is right for the Ministry, along with food producers and consumers, to demand nothing less than the highest of journalistic standards from reporters.

          It wouldn't be the first time the media has got it horribly wrong.

          Skewed reporting of a suggested link between autism and the MMR vaccine, a shot against measles, mumps and rubella, led to wide-spread public panic regarding the safety of the vaccine in many Western countries.

          Immunization rates plummeted and an illness "that had pretty much been consigned to the dustbin of diseases", as a UK Guardian columnist put it, has returned once more.

          In 1998 Dr Andrew Wakefield published a study suggesting a link between the MMR jab and autism and "numerous newspapers and magazines championed him as a brave voice of reason and chastised the government for trying to silence his findings". The columnist goes on to say that "even as Dr Wakefield's claims were roundly discredited by experts, journalists continued to back him".

          Sensationalist news sells papers, it generates page views, but it is certainly not the job of the media to scare readers senseless, especially without the fact checking to warrant it.

          When it comes to reporting food safety scandals, reporters and their media outlets must strive for more than a "he said, she said" type of story. They must independently verify facts and not give unwarranted voice to crackpot science or conspiracy theories.

          When such journalistic standards are adhered to, any attempts by the Health Ministry to blacklist journalists would, in my opinion, be heavy handed and an alarming step on a slippery slope of thwarting press freedom.

          Kim Bowden hails from Auckland, New Zealand, where she recently completed AUT University’s Postgraduate Journalism Diploma, top of her class.

          分享按鈕
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品毛片在线看| 91毛片网| 国产精品一区 在线播放| 亚洲色大成网站www永久男同| 免费无码中文字幕A级毛片| 欧美在线人视频在线观看| 亚洲国产成人精品福利在线观看| 亚洲综合av一区二区三区| 又大又紧又粉嫩18p少妇| 亚洲国产欧美在线看片一国产| 与子乱对白在线播放单亲国产| 亚洲综合激情六月婷婷在线观看| 国产av国片精品一区二区| 亚洲成人av在线高清| 亚洲国产在一区二区三区| 久久青草热| 在线看片免费人成视久网| 免费看黄片一区二区三区| 狠狠v日韩v欧美v| 西西大胆午夜人体视频| 亚洲毛片无码专区亚洲乱| 国产精品v片在线观看不卡| 国产成人久久精品激情91| 国内熟女中文字幕第一页| 精品一区二区三区四区五区| 四虎库影成人在线播放| 尤物视频色版在线观看| 国产午夜亚洲精品不卡福利| 最新国产精品中文字幕| 国产成人AV在线播放不卡| 青青草无码免费一二三区| 日韩精品少妇无码受不了| 国产精品不卡一区二区三区 | 2020狠狠狠狠久久免费观看| 一区二区中文字幕av| 国产无套乱子伦精彩是白视频| 视频一区二区三区四区久久| 夜爽8888视频在线观看| 日本激情久久精品人妻热| 成在线人午夜剧场免费无码| 风韵丰满熟妇啪啪区老熟熟女|