<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          No absolute freedom of speech

          By Ku Ma (China Daily) Updated: 2013-10-29 07:18

          It's a big pity that the Western media rushed to join in the debate sparked by Chen Yongzhou, a Chinese tabloid journalist who was detained on charges of defaming a construction equipment maker, while only a few of them paid much attention to Jimmy Kimmel's "kill every one in China" comment, which should surely have been even more eye catching.

          No absolute freedom of speech

          Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel. [Photo / Xinhua]

          Chen has been portrayed by many Western media outlets as the latest "victim" in China's "new curbs on journalists, lawyers and Internet users". ABC talk show host Kimmel praised a boy's idea to deal with US debt crisis by "killing every one in China" as "interesting", which outraged Chinese people, but did not provoke much criticism from his fellow journalists.

          These two unrelated incidents raise a common question: speech freedom is a shared value, but what are the boundaries of this freedom?

          Freedom of speech should certainly be protected, however, there is no, and can be no, "absolute speech freedom", no matter whether it is in China or in the West.

          The tabloid reporter Chen's case is still under investigation. Over the weekend, Chen confessed on State broadcaster Central China Television that he received bribes to invent negative stories about Changsha-based Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co. Ltd. New Express, the Guangzhou tabloid that employed Chen, had published two bold front-page pleas for police to release him last week. But on Sunday it issued an apology for the false reports.

          CCTV's reports sparked controversy because its images of Chen in handcuffs may lead the public to believe he is a criminal. But before his confession many netizens had supported Chen, insisting he was wronged by Hunan police.

          The media should not intervene in justice. Chen should not be considered a criminal before he has been convicted in court, neither should he be portrayed as a victim before then. CCTV's reports, despite being controversial, were a sort of media rebalancing after the majority of online opinion favored Chen against the police.

          It' s a basic journalism principle that journalists should base their reports on the facts they discover rather than invent stories, and they should of course not take bribes. If the charges against Chen prove true, the case will be judged and he will be sentenced according to the law.

          Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          New type of urbanization is in the details
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲日韩性欧美中文字幕| 精品无码视频| 亚洲欧美人成人让影院| 国产999久久高清免费观看| 国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件| 国产精品色一区二区三区| 国产精品鲁鲁鲁| 国产极品粉嫩馒头一线天| 亚洲一区二区三区啪啪| 国产精品第一区亚洲精品| 男女猛烈无遮挡免费视频| 国产av一区二区三区天堂综合网| 亚洲 欧洲 自拍 另类 校园| 国产明星精品无码AV换脸| 国产香蕉国产精品偷在线观看 | 欧美日韩在线亚洲二区综二| 国产麻豆剧果冻传媒一区| 亚洲偷自拍国综合| 无码AV中文字幕久久专区| 四虎成人在线观看免费| 国产中文字幕精品在线| 一本一本大道香蕉久在线播放| 色综合热无码热国产| 久久婷婷大香萑太香蕉AV人| 成人看的污污超级黄网站免费 | 国产av中文字幕精品| 97视频精品全国免费观看| 七妺福利精品导航大全| 真人在线射美女视频在线观看| 小伙无套内射老熟女精品| 视频一区视频二区在线视频| av天堂久久精品影音先锋| 国产乱码一区二区三区免费| 亚洲日本乱码熟妇色精品| 国产成人AV男人的天堂| 日韩精品一卡二卡在线观看| 57pao国产成视频免费播放| 日本午夜精品一区二区| 在线观看肉片av网站免费| 综合欧美视频一区二区三区| 精品无码人妻一区二区三区|