<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / From the Readers

          HK 'protesters' moving in wrong direction of democracy

          By Li Dabing (China Daily) Updated: 2014-10-28 07:42

          They took to the streets of Athens and other cities in Greece, burned cars, vandalized other properties and clashed with riot police, all in the glare of the global media, in the name of democracy and to get their grievances redressed.

          Is this a classic example of democracy that ancient Greece claims to have gifted to the rest of the world? Why has "democracy" been failing? It has failed in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. It has failed in the Philippines and Thailand. But why has it had failed in the US, the most advanced country where education and democratic institutions are well developed? The answer lies in human nature. Perhaps we humans are not made to deserve democracy.

          The basic characteristic of "democracy" is "one man, one vote". Demographics of most countries show that the majority of votes are concentrated at the bottom of society. And to get those votes, politicians literally enter a race to the bottom, where the foremost concern of voters is personal gain. What's good for society and the future, even if understood, often becomes irrelevant. In opinion polls and at voting booths, only voters' self-perceived interests count.

          All politicians understand this, and thus bribe the people using funds from the national treasuries. All modern democracies, from the US to Greece, from Thailand to the Philippines, will degenerate into this race to the bottom.

          Moreover, the democracy premise that voters know what's good for all and will vote rationally seems utopian. Another utopian premise of democracy is "majority rule", because in reality, a tiny minority often controls the decision-making process in so-called democratic societies. In Hong Kong, an illiterate old woman, manipulated by some people in the name of "democracy", became the poster opposition figure against a proposed key infrastructure project. The delay thus caused will cost Hong Kong hundreds of billions of dollars.

          The Catholic Church operates more like a meritocracy, not democracy. And in Singapore, a benign one-party rule has transformed a small, poor country into a first world financial, logistics and service hub characterized by economic prosperity and racial harmony.

          In China, for the past more than three decades, a unique system of consultative decision-making by the government has succeeded in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and generated unprecedented economic growth. It seems that history is being re-written on the political system called "democracy". And the writing is on the wall. Western-style democracy may well be in its last legs.

          LI DABING, A HONG KONG RESIDENT, via e-mail

          Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 久在线视频播放免费视频| 国产在线乱子伦一区二区| 中文字幕无线码免费人妻| 久久精品无码专区东京热| 亚洲特黄色片一区二区三区| 国产毛片基地| 免费无码va一区二区三区| 国产农村老太xxxxhdxx| 国产 亚洲 制服 无码 中文| 亚洲精品日韩在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品不卡| 色九月亚洲综合网| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 国产激情精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久福利69堂| 午夜福利日本一区二区无码| chinese性内射高清国产| 国产视色精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲高清WWW色好看美女| 丁香婷婷激情综合俺也去| 亚洲成人动漫av在线| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 加勒比无码人妻东京热| 久久夜色精品国产爽爽| 大香蕉av一区二区三区| 麻豆高清免费国产一区| 国产精品99一区二区三区| 青青操国产| 国产成人午夜福利在线观看| 久久国产精品老女人| 激情综合网一区二区三区| 91久久偷偷做嫩草影院免费看| 午夜福利偷拍国语对白| 亚洲精品天堂在线观看| 成全影视大全在线观看| 青青草一区在线观看视频| 日本国产精品第一页久久| 久久久一本精品99久久精品36| 精品国产一区二区三区在线观看| 人妻中出无码中字在线| 日本乱人伦AⅤ精品|