Questions over driver's diagnosis need answers

A policeman puts a green hat on a girl's head. [Photo/CFP]

A driver who was responsible for a fatal accident in Nanjing, East China's Jiangsu province, in June has been diagnosed with mental health issues - a guarantee of limited criminal liability - the Nanjing traffic management bureau announced on Sunday. The driver killed two people when his BMW hurtled into a Mazda when he tried to run a red light at over 195 kilometers per hour. Comments:

The Nanjing driver's diagnosis is just suggestive of reduced criminal liability, it is not a binding judicial decision. In other words, it could be overturned or denied in the face of a valid objection. Indeed, it is understandable that some people will question the diagnosis. But lawbreakers too have legal rights. The driver's mental illness is only unconfirmed evidence that has to be reasonably looked at; on the other hand, the local judicial department should resort to a just verdict to alleviate public concerns.

Beijing News, Sept 8

For most ordinary citizens who have limited trust in the use of public power, the diagnosis of acute and transient psychotic disorders may be new to their ears, leading to some wild speculation that the illness was just made up to reduce the BMW driver's punishment. Of course, they have reason to challenge its legitimacy. That being said, all those concerned with the case should fulfill their responsibilities, before speculation sways the penalty.

Southern Metropolis Daily, Sept 8

Given the extensive attention the case has received, it is praiseworthy that the Nanjing traffic authorities are protecting the BMW driver's legal rights by following the proper judicial procedure. But it is also notable that the investigation has unveiled some evidence that most people are questioning. Therefore, the judicial organs are obliged to disclose all the relevant information in a transparent and fair manner in an open trial.

gmw.cn, Sept 8

The diagnosis that the luxury car driver suffered from acute and transient psychotic disorder might make a difference to both the basic facts and the final verdict in the Nanjing case, because the driver will receive a much lighter penalty if this is the case. Given the nationwide promotion of the rule of law, whether the diagnosis is real or not will significantly affect the credibility of the country's judicial system.

Xinhua Daily Telegraph, Sept 9