<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Globalization and its disconnect

          By Stephen S. Roach (China Daily) Updated: 2016-07-28 07:50

          But the stakes may be greater if today's more powerful globalization were to meet a similar fate, because the scope of Globalization 2.0 is far broader, including growing trade in many so-called intangibles-once non-tradable services.

          The sharpest contrast between the two waves of globalization is in the speed of technology absorption and disruption. It took only five years for 50 million US households to begin surfing the internet, whereas it took 38 years for a similar number to gain access to radios.

          Sadly, the economics profession has failed to grasp the inherent problems with globalization. In fixating on an antiquated theory, they have all but ignored the here and now of a mounting worker backlash. Yet the breadth and speed of Globalization 2.0 demand new approaches to cushion the blows of this disruption.

          Unfortunately, safety-net programs to help trade-displaced or trade-pressured workers are just as obsolete as theories of comparative advantage. The US' Trade Adjustment Assistance program, for example, was enacted in 1962 for the manufacturing-based economy of yesteryear, and a Peterson Institute report says only 2 million workers have benefited from it since 1974.

          The design of more enlightened policies must account for the powerful pressures now bearing down on a much broader array of workers. The hyper-speed of Globalization 2.0 suggests the need for quicker triggers and wider coverage for worker retraining, relocation allowances, job-search assistance, wage insurance for older workers and longer-duration unemployment benefits.

          As history cautions, the alternative-whether it is Brexit or the US' new isolationism-is an accident waiting to happen. It is up to those of us who defend free trade and globalization to prevent that, by offering concrete solutions that address the very real problems that now afflict so many workers.

          The author, a faculty member at Yale University and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, is the author of Unbalanced: The Codependency of America and China

          Project Syndicate

          Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品成人A在线观看| 久久久国产成人一区二区| 久久久久中文字幕精品视频| 亚洲欧美国产另类视频| 又粗又硬又黄a级毛片| 国产一级片内射在线视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 体态丰腴的微胖熟女的特征| 日韩午夜一区二区福利视频| 2019亚洲午夜无码天堂| 99中文字幕精品国产| 久久国产乱子伦免费精品无码| 国产精品成人av电影不卡| 无码人妻丝袜在线视频| 久久91精品国产一区二区| av中文字幕一区二区| 亚洲永久一区二区三区在线 | 色悠久久网国产精品99| 国产高清自产拍av在线| 国产精品一区二区久久| 国产精品偷乱一区二区三区| 国产果冻豆传媒麻婆精东| 国产极品精品自在线不卡| 日夜啪啪一区二区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 欧美高清精品一区二区| 色综合久久久久综合体桃花网| A级毛片免费完整视频| 亚欧AV无码乱码在线观看性色| 久久精品国产清自在天天线| 蜜桃视频在线网站免费看| 日本深夜福利在线观看| 久久www视频| 中文字幕亚洲资源网久久| 亚洲色图欧美激情| 国产成人精品一区二区无| 毛片免费观看视频| 成人精品久久一区二区三区| 亚洲精品自拍在线视频| 国产精品成人自产拍在线| 亚洲免费视频一区二区三区 |