<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          By Berlin Fang | China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-31 07:24

          Textbooks can't be the only guide for pupils

          Students from the Qiang ethnic group study the regional textbook in Sichuan province.[Photo/China Daily]

          The People's Education Press has announced that it will remove the "fake text" about Thomas Edison (1847-1931) from textbooks since the next semester from September.

          According to that text, Edison, as a child, used mirrors to direct light to the operation table during his mother's appendicitis surgery. Though the story highlights the earlier creativity of Edison, the first appendicitis surgery was performed in 1886, when Edison was 39 years old.

          Some people said some Chinese textbooks have similar factual errors. For instance, one text describes a father rushing to a school to save students after the 1994 earthquake rocked California. Yet a simple fact check shows the 1994 earthquake occurred at 4:30 am when most of the students were in bed. All such texts sound like the story of George Washington cutting the cherry tree, teaching good moral lessons with fake stories, which eventually lead to credibility problems. And after suspecting readers debunk such stories, editors should either correct the mistakes or remove the contents from textbooks.

          But a few authorities argue that these are not history textbooks, but books to teach Chinese language and literature to students. As such, they allow room for fictional "embellishments". Such arguments are indefensible, as Edison is a historical figure and biographical materials should be faithful to facts. Authors or editors cannot just make up content with factual loopholes.

          It causes a great uproar every time there is an issue with Chinese textbooks, for instance, when someone detects a problem, or when editors remove a historically revered author's article. One wonders why such debates don't stay in the smaller circles of Chinese teachers and textbook compilers. The main reason is that the teaching of language and literature revolves excessively around the use of a few textbooks students are assigned, even when there are more and better reading materials out there.

          In urban areas with ample number of bookstores and libraries, students have access to other books they can read, which could mitigate the problems caused by these "fake texts". But in rural and less-developed areas, students don't have facilities or resources to borrow or buy additional books. Their textbooks become the only books they read, hence their importance and the public attention on them.

          I have also noticed that none of the textbook controversies in the past decade was identified by a student suspecting an error. It is worrisome that the majority of students just accept whatever they get.

          Heavy dependence on textbooks in China might cause "intellectual malnutrition" among students. It's true that editors carefully select these textbooks, but students should also be taught to find additional reading materials to enrich themselves. Educators and families should not put all their developmental eggs in one textbook basket for students. While publishers should address the problems with textbooks, I have higher hope that teachers and parents would scaffold students' ability to choose additional sources to read. I also plead for more reading, as a thin textbook doesn't offer much for the developmental needs at any grade level.

          To widen students' scope of reading, the Chinese government ought to build libraries in less-developed areas. With ubiquitous technology and mobile phone access, Chinese educators should also think of innovative solutions to help students overcome the problems with accessing high-quality reading materials.

          Mobile reading is becoming increasingly available for the average Chinese reader, and plenty of reading materials have already been digitized. The scarcity of content or platforms should no longer be a problem. What follows then is the development of teachers' ability to help students screen and select a vast array of reading materials.

          Besides, increased need for reading should be an opportunity for textbook publishers, too, as they can offer more products to teachers and parents to choose from.

          Berlin Fang is an instructional designer, literary translator and columnist writing on cross-cultural issues.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 青青草无码免费一二三区| 日本乱人伦AⅤ精品| 2022亚洲男人天堂| 成人3D动漫一区二区三区 | 午夜福利免费区在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区日本久久| 成人亚洲网站www在线观看| 国产一区二区三区不卡在线看| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区中| 理论片午午伦夜理片影院99| 五月天天天综合精品无码| 日本一区二区三区精品视频| 国产香蕉在线视频| 日吹毛片日韩v国产v亚洲v精品v| 国产精品一在线观看| 99热成人精品热久久66| 亚洲一区二区av在线| 精品一区二区亚洲国产| 成人拍拍拍无遮挡免费视频| 国产网友愉拍精品视频| 国产日产欧产精品精品| 日本公与熄乱理在线播放| 国产成人精品亚洲午夜| 热久久国产| julia无码中文字幕一区| 军人粗大的内捧猛烈进出视频| 91久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜| 精品一日韩美女性夜视频| 亚洲一区二区偷拍精品| 国产色无码精品视频免费| 中文字幕在线永久免费视频 | 亚洲欧美人成人让影院| 色道久久综合亚洲精品蜜桃| 亚洲 日本 欧洲 欧美 视频| 国产精品免费视频不卡| 窝窝午夜色视频国产精品破 | 91年精品国产福利线观看久久| 中文字幕乱偷无码av先锋蜜桃| 久久精品国产99亚洲精品| 国产精品不卡一区二区视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av |