<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             

          US OK'd troop terror hunts in Pakistan

          (AP)
          Updated: 2007-08-24 17:08

          Newly uncovered "rules of engagement" show the US military gave elite units broad authority more than three years ago to pursue suspected terrorists into Pakistan, with no mention of telling the Pakistanis in advance.

          The documents show what Army Rangers and other terrorist-hunting units were authorized to do earlier in the war on terror. Some of those same guidelines have remained in place, such as the right to "hot pursuit" across the border.

          Washington repeated assurances it would consult before any such incursions.

          But summaries of the rules of engagement on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in April 2004 say chasing al-Qaida leaders across the frontier was fair game.

          One summary states that "Entry into PAK authorized for" the following reasons:

          -"Hot pursuit" of al-Qaida, Taliban and terrorist command-and-control targets "from AFG into Pakistan (must be continuous and uninterrupted)."

          -If the head of US Central Command, which oversees American forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, approved direct action "against The Big 3," listed as Osama bin Laden; his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri; and Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar. The three are still believed to be hiding in the border region.

          -If the Defense secretary approved such an incursion.

          Other grounds for incursions into Pakistan, according to this summary, were "personnel recovery," including rescuing troops after the downing of aircraft; and troops "in contact with" the enemy, meaning under fire.

          As for "geographic limits," the memo states: "General rule: penetrate no deeper than 10 km," or 6.2 miles.

          Told of the guidelines, Pakistani military spokesman Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said, "This is all nonsense. Pakistan never allowed the coalition forces to enter into our territory while chasing militants. There was no such agreement, there was no such understanding."

          Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Todd Vician said this week he could not comment. "As a policy we don't talk about rules of engagement, certainly not about current rules in place for any operations in Afghanistan, Iraq or any other operation," he said.

          The 2004 documents were included among 1,100 pages of investigative documents generated by the Army's probe into the death of NFL player-turned-Ranger Pat Tillman, whose platoon was operating in the region at the time.

          E-mail exchanges between Ranger officers in the documents make no mention of a requirement to inform Pakistan in advance of strikes into that country.

          However, one summary mentions a chain of required notifications, which resulted in Pakistan being apprised - apparently after the fact. One rule says "joint task force commander must inform CENTCOM immediately" and ensure the "Mil Liaison team" in Islamabad was notified.

          Operations officers had a hot line to that liaison office, which would in turn inform Pakistani officials, according to a US officer who served in the region and is knowledgable about operations within Afghanistan during that mid-2004 period. On some occasions, the officer said, Pakistanis would detect ground or air incursions and request explanations from the Americans, who would open inquiries.

          Interviews with officers in the field, and the public statements of top US commanders, indicate similar guidelines remain in place today.

          At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in March, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., asked Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, "Do we have to have the approval of the Pakistani government in hot pursuit across the border?"

          No, Lute replied. If US forces spot so much as a "hostile intent" against them and chase the threat toward the border, "then we have all the authorities we need to pursue, either with fires or on the ground, across the border," he said.

          Even a surveillance report of enemy fighters setting up a rocket and pointing it west into Afghanistan is enough to trigger a unilateral military response, said Lute, then the chief operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and now President Bush's deputy national security adviser - the "war czar" on Iraq and Afghanistan.

          Lt. Col. David Accetta, spokesman for US troops in Afghanistan, said last week he could not talk about rules of engagement along the Pakistan border. He did say, after an AP reporter informed him of Horrigan's comments, that the rules haven't changed since January, when Horrigan spoke.

          A high-ranking Ranger officer who has served in Afghanistan and is familiar with the current rules of engagement said that if he found himself "in contact" with the enemy at the border, he would feel authorized to chase them into Pakistan. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the high sensitivity of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

          A tribal leader, Momin Khan, said the Americans took away five tribesmen. The Muslim cleric whose home was attacked was not there, but an explosion had killed eight people and wounded nine.

          The US military denied involvement, and Pakistan's chief Army spokesman said he couldn't confirm the raid.

          A week later, the CIA purportedly sent a Predator drone from Afghanistan into Pakistan, unsuccessfully firing missiles at al-Zawahri. The attack missed bin Laden's deputy but reportedly killed four other al-Qaida leaders - although that information was never verified - and 13 villagers. Pakistan officially condemned the attack and said it had no advance notice.

          In recent weeks, top Bush administration officials have staked out sometimes varying positions on the matter of penetrating Pakistani's borders.

          On August 5, Defense Secretary Robert Gates was cautious in describing how US officials would handle an incursion. "I think we would not act without telling (Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf) what we were planning to do," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

          That was far more tentative than what White House homeland security adviser Frances Townsend said last month when asked on Fox News why the US wasn't sending special operations forces and drones into Pakistan.

          "Well, just because we don't speak about things publicly doesn't mean we're not doing many of the things you're talking about," Townsend said. She didn't elaborate.

          On August 5 at Camp David with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Bush wouldn't say whether he would consult with Pakistan before ordering US forces to act inside that country. "With real actionable intelligence, we will get the job done," Bush said, without elaborating.



          Top World News  
          Today's Top News  
          Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 一个人看的www视频免费观看| 老太大性另类xxxⅹ| 国产乱妇乱子视频在播放| 午夜A理论片在线播放| 欧美成人一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲乱码一二三四区国产| 久久91精品国产一区二区| 久久中文字幕一区二区| 亚洲永久精品唐人导航网址| 日韩女同一区二区三区久久| 猫咪网网站免费观看| 日韩精品一区二区三区激| 久久一区二区中文字幕| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频 | 秋霞人妻无码中文字幕| 免费夜色污私人影院在线观看| 综合久久婷婷综合久久| 亚洲AV永久无码精品秋霞电影影院| 北条麻妃无码| 成人av午夜在线观看| 日韩国产成人精品视频| 成人国产一区二区三区精品| 日本一区二区精品色超碰| 美女又黄又免费的视频| 国产成人麻豆亚洲综合无码精品| 成人精品视频在线观看播放| 人妻系列无码专区免费| 亚洲毛片无码专区亚洲乱| 国产suv精品一区二区四| 欧美韩国精品另类综合| 国产成人精品亚洲资源| 久久精品一区二区三区综合| 熟女亚洲综合精品伊人久久| 成人精品区| 米奇亚洲国产精品思久久| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 免费观看全黄做爰大片| 99久久精品费精品国产一区二 | 激情综合网激情国产av| 久久高清超碰AV热热久久 | 亚洲成人av在线资源网|