<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          World / Opinion

          A for entertainment, F for accuracy

          By Chris Peterson (China Daily Europe) Updated: 2015-08-30 13:06

          BBC documentary series on China-UK education project is fun but flawed

          It ran for three weeks, and triggered an avalanche of comments both in China and the UK. Debate rages about the merits of British education versus the Chinese system. Most of my friends and colleagues have watched it, and I have been glued to the screen.

          The series, Are Our Kids Tough Enough? Chinese School, has been described by critics and viewers variously as car-crash television, reality TV gone mad, an insult to both Chinese and UK teachers, and a superficial attempt to tackle an interesting question.

          Me, I tend toward the car-crash television theory - you watch because you are waiting for the next bit of high drama.

          One thing that did surprise me was that the three-part series was made in conjunction with Britain's Open University, which provides distance learning and off-campus study for tens of thousands of people in Britain, either those in work, or those who missed out on a traditional bricks and mortar educational career path. In other words, a serious educational establishment.

          I should confess here and declare an interest - I am studying for a BA honours degree in History at the OU. But that's given me access to the members-only online debate that's been set off by this series.

          And what a debate - over 30 pages of comments, averaging at least 10 comments per page, from OU students past and present, of all ages and from all backgrounds. I don't think I've seen such a reaction to a subject since I started my studies two years ago.

          There are common themes running through the debate thread - outrage at the behavior of the students, harsh criticism for the apparent aloofness and remote attitudes of the Bohunt School staff members, disbelief at the disruptiveness of some students, disagreement over the accuracy of the Chinese and British systems as portrayed, and sympathy for the five Chinese teachers involved in the month-long project.

          Sample comments:

          "I watched with dismay this tosh (rubbish) on television."

          "A dreadful, smug head."

          "Uninspiring Chinese teachers."

          "Merely lame 'edutainment' - the cameraman zoomed in on the pretty girls in the class."

          "It does look as if the Chinese teachers were set up to fail, and reinforce the prejudices of the rather smug English teachers that our system is better."

          "Chinese school students need more creativity and vitality, and British students need more perseverance and responsibility."

          "I am appalled by this documentary. It is utterly unfair to put Chinese teachers into a British school to teach Year 9s."

          "In Britain we seem to have turned education into a form of entertainment, a game that everybody wins."

          "The Chinese teachers must have known to some extent what they were letting themselves in for."

          "Students I teach from China can also be lazy and disrespectful, but express it in different ways - evasiveness, plagiarism and being uncooperative in class."

          And the comments go on, and on, with a fair number of Chinese contributors as well as Britons.

          From my perspective, I feel it is wholly wrong to portray this as a serious experiment - it only lasted for a month, and there was no attempt to mention any caveats.

          We learn from the Chinese-language media that only two of the teachers were straight from the education system in China - the rest, it is said, have been living and teaching in the UK for several years. I can't vouch for the accuracy of that.

          If you looked closely, the various students who were misbehaving and disruptive were all wearing discreet microphones clipped onto their polo shirts - the others did not. That raises strong doubts in my mind about the spontaneity of the scenes in class.

          My wife, herself a product of a French education in her native Vietnam, came up with the word that summed up a lot of what the program was purporting to say. That word is "disconnect".

          Disconnect in as much as it was clear the students, Chinese teachers and English teachers, as well as parents, had little or no understanding of what was happening.

          If you take two totally separate societies and cultures and compare the two, of course there will be differences.

          Point a camera at most teenagers, and they will for the most part act up.

          I have been through a traditional English education, my daughters have done the same, and I am watching my two grandchildren navigate their way through the vagaries of the English primary system. Plus, my eldest daughter is a teacher, and she has never witnessed any scenes such as those depicted in these programs.

          I work with Chinese colleagues here in London, and all are adamant that China's system is changing, and has been for the past decade.

          Pause here for a smug, I-told-you-so moment. After the second episode aired, I firmly predicted to colleagues in the office that there would be a happy, Disney-like ending.

          There was. The badly-behaved members of the class miraculously got their acts together, the Chinese teachers relaxed slightly, and in the final test between the English system and the Chinese method, China edged it. Self-conscious high-fives all round, with pupils admitting they had enjoyed it after all.

          You couldn't have made it up. Well, if you were producing a three-part television series you could.

          And here's a final thought - if the British education system is so lacking, why do thousands of Chinese students come here to sample its sixth-form colleges and universities?

          I have the overwhelming feeling that what the producers were looking for was sensational tabloid-style television. Fine, but please don't present it as a serious study.

          A bit like comparing chalk and cheese, really.

          The author is managing editor of Europe for China Daily.

          Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
          May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
          Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
          Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
          Most Popular
          Hot Topics

          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 深夜释放自己在线观看| 国产乱色国产精品免费视频| 久久综合亚洲鲁鲁九月天| 亚洲国产成人无码av在线播放| 日韩高清在线亚洲专区国产| 色偷偷av一区二区三区| 成人深夜福利av在线| 亚洲成人av在线系列| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合| 国产免费一区二区不卡| 超级碰免费视频91| 国产黄色精品一区二区三区| 亚欧洲乱码视频在线专区| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频| 久久精品亚洲热综合一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日产国码二区在线| 蜜臀av黑人亚洲精品| 亚洲一区二区三区水蜜桃| 99精品人妻少妇一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av久| 大桥未久亚洲无av码在线| 国产欧美日韩精品第二区| 日本久久精品一区二区三区| 18禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 成 人色 网 站 欧美大片| 九草在线观看视频免费福利| 国产精品高清中文字幕| 特黄三级一区二区三区| 福利一区二区在线视频| 中文无码av一区二区三区| 91高清免费国产自产拍| 搡老女人老妇女老熟妇69| 亚洲乱色熟女一区二区蜜臀| 一区二区三区AV波多野结衣| 国产精品黄色大片在线看| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠av不卡| 无码国产精品一区二区av| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品| 国内精品久久久久影院薰衣草| 日韩精品永久免费播放平台| 亚洲精品有码在线观看|