<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Make me your Homepage
          left corner left corner
          China Daily Website

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Updated: 2013-11-30 09:36
          By Cao Yin ( China Daily)

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, is interrupted by a Beijing Times reporter as the two argue about water standards during a news conference in Beijing on Monday. [Zou Hong / China Daily]


          A high-profile case in which a bottled-water producer accused a Beijing newspaper of defamation was heard at Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court on Friday.

          Nongfu Spring, one of China's bottled-water giants, argued with the Beijing Times for more than half a year, claiming the newspaper intentionally and systematically ran 76 "fake" stories from April 10 to May 7 in order to tarnish its image.

          On April 28, the company, based in Hangzhou, capital of Zhejiang province, filed suit against the paper in the capital's No 2 Intermediate People's Court, saying the media had imposed "propagandistic violence" against it and asking for 60 million yuan ($9.7 million) as compensation.

          Later, in Chaoyang District People's Court, the newspaper countercharged the company with damaging its reputation while claiming that the enterprise was following standards laxer than those for tap water when manufacturing its bottled-water products.

          The producer then increased its compensation demand to 200 million yuan.

          On May 6, Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, said the company had adopted both national standards and provincial requirements in Zhejiang, and that the national standards are mandatory for every bottled-water company, which is why they were not printed on its labels.

          Zhong added that in case there is a discrepancy between the two standards, his company follows the stricter one.

          The giant also announced it was closing its branch in the capital, and its dispute with the newspaper became white-hot in a news conference on the same day.

          Chaoyang court finally merged the two cases to try to resolve the conflict.

          At Friday's hearing, the newspaper's representatives provided more than 20 bottles of water, saying all of them followed the national standard except Nongfu, which followed the provincial standard.

          The newspaper's lawyers, Zhang Bin and Xie Guanbin, said during the hearing that before publishing the stories, the paper contacted more than 10 water specialists to ensure that the reports were accurate.

          Apart from Beijing Times, other media, including People's Daily, China Central Television and Xinhua News Agency, had published or broadcast similar stories about Nongfu, the lawyers said.

          "What we question is why the company followed the local water standard, not its product's quality. In other words, what we doubted is the disordered water standard in our country," Zhang said. "The company confused the public and defamed the paper with ugly words.

          "Our client did not fabricate the facts that Nongfu products were off the shelves in supermarkets, because that was provided by a Beijing-based bottled-water association," she said, adding that the media sent an interview outline to the giant.

          The newspaper asked the company to pay 1 yuan as a symbolic compensation, as it was simply aiming to improve the truth of its reports, the lawyers added.

          But Ye Zhijian and Zhang Zhaohua, attorneys for the enterprise, said the stories were not rigorous or scientific, and that the newspaper interpreted out of context the facts in a bid to deliberately smear Nongfu.

          "Take one report's headline, for example. It said Nongfu Spring was not as good as tap water, which obviously damages our client's reputation," Ye said.

          In addition, the company decided to sue the water association because it did not give comments based on the facts and provided information to the media without confirmation, Zhang added.

          The court asked the two parties to continue organizing evidence and did not hand down a verdict after the almost three-hour hearing.

          Earlier in November, the company filed complaints with the top media regulator, made amid a nationwide campaign by the government and news organizations to crack down on false reports and journalistic corruption.

          The move was launched after police in Hunan province detained Chen Yongzhou, a journalist with the Guangdong-based New Express who was suspected of taking bribes and denigrating a Hunan enterprise with fabricated information.

           
           
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 一本一本久久久久a久久综合激情| 99热门精品一区二区三区无码 | 国产精品亚洲аv无码播放| 欧美激情一区二区三区成人| 色8久久人人97超碰香蕉987| 久久91精品国产一区二区| 九九热在线免费视频精品| 午夜一区欧美二区高清三区| 国产传媒剧情久久久av| 久久国产免费观看精品3| 动漫AV纯肉无码AV电影网| 日本视频精品一区二区| 草草浮力影院| 亚洲人成网站观看在线观看| 97精品国产91久久久久久久| 成人午夜在线观看刺激| 久久久一本精品99久久| 绝顶丰满少妇av无码| 潮喷失禁大喷水无码| 国产精品亚洲片在线| 精品国产一区二区三区大| 真人在线射美女视频在线观看 | 四虎国产精品成人免费久久| 在线A级毛片无码免费真人| 亚洲国产综合专区在线播放| 国产成人人综合亚洲欧美丁香花 | 日韩精品国产另类专区| 亚洲夂夂婷婷色拍WW47| 69天堂人成无码麻豆免费视频| 国内在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产成人久久精品软件| 日本久久一区二区三区高清| 日韩永久永久永久黄色大片| 91精品国产福利尤物免费| 99香蕉国产精品偷在线观看| 福利视频一区二区在线| 亚国产欧美在线人成| 亚洲精品国产无套在线观| 亚洲精品区午夜亚洲精品区| 午夜精品一区二区三区的区别| 亚洲人成人网站色www|