<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:41

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system-people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲狼人久久伊人久久伊| 国产伦一区二区三区视频| 国产av剧情无码精品色午夜| 又大又硬又爽免费视频| 日本一区二区三区视频版| 爽死你欧美大白屁股在线| 熟女国产精品一区二区三| 中文有无人妻VS无码人妻激烈| 国产精品久久久久影院色 | 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁| 国产肥臀视频一区二区三区 | 18禁午夜宅男成年网站| 欧美自慰一级看片免费| 亚洲精品一二三区在线看| 无码成人AV在线一区二区| 日韩精品人妻黄色一级片| 久久精品蜜芽亚洲国产AV| 久久精品国产久精国产| 特级精品毛片免费观看| 亚洲高清国产拍精品熟女| 日本成熟少妇激情视频免费看| 欧美国产中文| 国产精品麻豆中文字幕| 东京热人妻丝袜无码AV一二三区观| 青春草公开在线视频日韩| 一本一本久久久久a久久综合激情| 伊人激情一区二区三区av| 4480yy亚洲午夜私人影院剧情| 国产成人久久精品二三区| 99久久精品国产一区二区暴力| 亚洲人成网站观看在线观看| 久久精品伊人狠狠大香网| 成在线人视频免费视频| 欧美不卡无线在线一二三区观| 无码gogo大胆啪啪艺术| 三上悠亚日韩精品二区| 精品无码国产污污污免费| 人人人澡人人肉久久精品| 人妻美女免费在线视频| 亚洲欧美自偷自拍视频图片| 97一区二区国产好的精华液|