<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:41

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system-people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 99热精国产这里只有精品 | 久久精品久久电影免费理论片| 国产蜜臀在线一区二区三区| 欧美妇人实战bbwbbw| 国产亚洲综合欧美视频| 久久青青草原亚洲AV无码麻豆| 色呦呦 国产精品| 色吊a中文字幕一二三区| 四虎国产精品永久在线| 国产久免费热视频在线观看| 五月天国产成人av免费观看| 日韩午夜福利片段在线观看| 亚洲一线二线三线品牌精华液久久久 | av中文字幕在线二区| 国产一区二区三区AV在线无码观看 | 高中女无套中出17p| 欧洲无码一区二区三区在线观看| 美女一区二区三区亚洲麻豆| 欧美高清freexxxx性| 亚洲夂夂婷婷色拍ww47| 精品国精品自拍自在线| 日夜啪啪一区二区三区| 姝姝窝人体色WWW在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区五区| 欧美精品国产综合久久| 北岛玲精品一区二区三区| 国产h视频免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲AV不卡 | 久久91综合国产91久久精品| 欧美性色欧美a在线播放| 中文字幕在线日韩| 亚洲av成人区国产精品| 国产一区二区精品久久凹凸| 国产精品国产精品一区精品| caoporn成人免费公开| 日韩放荡少妇无码视频| 成人看的污污超级黄网站免费| 国产一级小视频| 91国语精品3p在线观看| 国产69堂免费视频| 俺来也俺去啦最新在线|