慶安官場被“鏈式舉報”

5月2日，哈爾濱鐵警在黑龍江慶安火車站開槍擊斃醉酒鬧事人員徐純合，該事件通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)迅速發(fā)酵，關(guān)于當?shù)毓賵龅呐e報帖集中爆發(fā)。

請看相關(guān)報道：

A man named Xu Chunhe was shot dead by a local policeman at the railway station in Qing'an, Heilongjiang because he caused disorder after drinking and had a fight with the policeman. The incident raised wide public concern, and during the investigation there was a chain of tip-offs about the illegal practices of local officials.
醉漢徐純合在黑龍江慶安火車站制造混亂，襲擊鐵警，被開槍擊斃一事引發(fā)公眾廣泛關(guān)注，而調(diào)查中，慶安當?shù)毓賳T的違法行徑被“鏈式舉報”。

打死徐純合的一槍成為了慶安官場地震的導火索（The fatal shooting of Xu Chunhe was the trigger for an "earthquake" in local official circles）。慶安縣副縣長董國生年齡、學歷造假（fabricate academic credentials ）和妻子吃空餉（freeloading）的違法行為東窗事發(fā)，已被停職（has been suspended）。還有人舉報當?shù)卮笈賳T涉嫌買賣教師編制（buy and sell officially budgeted teacher posts）。

不能否認，徐純合事件客觀上推動了對當?shù)毓賳T的反腐調(diào)查進程（accelerated the anti-corruption campaign）。它將公眾注意力引到了慶安這個縣城，輿論聚光燈照射之下，當?shù)毓賵龅囊慌e一動自然備受關(guān)注（under scrutinizing eyes）。

但針對慶安官員的舉報一起接一起，卻也表明當?shù)亻L年積累下來的問題之多，也說明了當?shù)貙θ罕娕e報（public tip-offs）、信訪（petitioning）的處理仍存在弊端。

（中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津 彭娜）